1994 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The list below consists of the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 1994. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.

Reasons[]

  Delivered the Court's reason
  Joined the Court's reason
  Filed a concurrence
  Joined a concurrence
  Filed a dissent
  Joined a dissent
  Filed a concurrence/dissent
  Joined a concurrence/dissent
  Did not participate in the judgment
  Not a member of the Court at the time of hearing or delivering
  • Decisions that do not note a Justice delivering the Court's reason are per coram.
  • Multiple concurrences and dissents within a case are numbered, with joining votes numbered accordingly. Justices occasionally join multiple reasons in a single case; each vote is subdivided accordingly.
  • Multiple unnumbered reasons are jointly written or delivered.
  • Decisions that are given orally from the bench are denoted by a "V"; per coram decisions delivered orally from the bench only note a "V" on the most senior justice on the panel.
  • An asterisk ( * ) in the Court's opinion denotes that it was only a majority in part or a plurality.
Case name Argued Decided Lamer La Forest L'Heureux-Dubé Sopinka Gonthier Cory McLachlin Iacobucci Major
R v Pétel, [1994] 1 SCR 3 [1] November 3, 1993 January 20, 1994
R v Colarusso, [1994] 1 SCR 20 [2]
Kenora (Town of) Hydro Electric Commission v Vacationland Dairy Co-operative Ltd, [1994] 1 SCR 80 [3]
Toneguzzo-Norvell (Guardian ad litem of) v Burnaby Hospital, [1994] 1 SCR 114 [4]
R v Arcangioli, [1994] 1 SCR 129 [5]
R v Pittman, [1994] 1 SCR 148 [6]
International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union—Canada Area Local 500 v Canada, [1994] 1 SCR 150 [7]
R v Dickson, [1994] 1 SCR 153 [8]
R v Richardson, [1994] 1 SCR 155 [9]
Gibney v Gilliland, [1994] 1 SCR 157 [10]
Quebec (AG) v Canada (National Energy Board), [1994] 1 SCR 159 [11]
Mobil Oil Canada Ltd v Canada-Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Board, [1994] 1 SCR 202 [12]
Shell Canada Products Ltd v Vancouver (City of), [1994] 1 SCR 231 [13]
United States of America v Lépine, [1994] 1 SCR 286 [14]
RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG), [1994] 1 SCR 311 [15]
Case name Argued Decided Lamer La Forest L'Heureux-Dubé Sopinka Gonthier Cory McLachlin Iacobucci Major
R v Nagra, [1994] 1 SCR 355 [16]
R v Bois, [1994] 1 SCR 357 [17]
Cunningham v Wheeler; Cooper v Miller; Shanks v McNee, [1994] 1 SCR 359 [18]
Brown v British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways), [1994] 1 SCR 420 [19]
Swinamer v Nova Scotia (AG), [1994] 1 SCR 445 [20]
R v Durette, [1994] 1 SCR 469 [21]
Bank of Nova Scotia v Dunphy Leasing Enterprises Ltd, [1994] 1 SCR 552 [22]
G (L) v B (G), [1995] 3 SCR 367
R v Finta, [1994] 1 SCR 701
R v P (MB), [1994] 1 SCR 555
R v Power, [1994] 1 SCR 601
R v Burns, [1994] 1 SCR 656
Galaske v O'Donnell, [1994] 1 SCR 670
Téléphone Guèvremont Inc v Quebec (Régie des télécommunications), [1994] 1 SCR 878
R v R (D), [1994] 1 SCR 881
Case name Argued Decided Lamer La Forest L'Heureux-Dubé Sopinka Gonthier Cory McLachlin Iacobucci Major
Masters v Masters, [1994] 1 SCR 883
R v M (ML), [1994] 2 SCR 3
R v Zazulak, [1994] 2 SCR 5
Boutin v Distributions CLB Inc, [1994] 2 SCR 7
R v Mohan, [1994] 2 SCR 9
British Columbia (AG) v Canada (AG); An Act respecting the Vancouver Island Railway (Re), [1994] 2 SCR 41
Zeitel v Ellscheid, [1994] 2 SCR 142
Catholic Children's Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto v M (C), [1994] 2 SCR 165
Willmor Discount Corp v Vaudreuil (City of), [1994] 2 SCR 210
R v Jones, [1994] 2 SCR 229
R v Howard, [1994] 2 SCR 299
R v Jack, [1994] 2 SCR 310
Canada v Antosko, [1994] 2 SCR 312
143471 Canada Inc v Quebec (AG); Tabah v Quebec (AG), [1994] 2 SCR 339
R v H (DS) and N (JD), [1994] 2 SCR 392
Case name Argued Decided Lamer La Forest L'Heureux-Dubé Sopinka Gonthier Cory McLachlin Iacobucci Major
Reza v Canada, [1994] 2 SCR 394
Schmidt v Air Products Canada Ltd, [1994] 2 SCR 611
R v Stellato, [1994] 2 SCR 478
R v McIntyre, [1994] 2 SCR 480
R v Giesbrecht, [1994] 2 SCR 482
R v Godin, [1994] 2 SCR 484
R v Richer, [1994] 2 SCR 486
R v Boersma, [1994] 2 SCR 488
Comité paritaire de l'industrie de la chemise v Potash; Comité paritaire de l'industrie de la chemise v Sélection Milton, [1994] 2 SCR 406
R v Rowbotham; R v Roblin, [1994] 2 SCR 463
Saskatchewan River Bungalows Ltd v Maritime Life Assurance Co, [1994] 2 SCR 490
R v Oommen, [1994] 2 SCR 507
Commission scolaire régionale de Chambly v Bergevin, [1994] 2 SCR 525
Pezim v British Columbia (Superintendent of Brokers), [1994] 2 SCR 557
Reference Re Quebec Sales Tax, [1994] 2 SCR 715
Case name Argued Decided Lamer La Forest L'Heureux-Dubé Sopinka Gonthier Cory McLachlin Iacobucci Major
R v Clemente, [1994] 2 SCR 758
Marzetti v Marzetti, [1994] 2 SCR 765
Tataryn v Tataryn Estate, [1994] 2 SCR 807
R v François, [1994] 2 SCR 827
R v Chartrand, [1994] 2 SCR 864
R v Moyer, [1994] 2 SCR 899
R v Whittle, [1994] 2 SCR 914
R v Tran, [1994] 2 SCR 951
R v C (TL), [1994] 2 SCR 1012
R v Bartle, [1994] 3 SCR 173
R v Prosper, [1994] 3 SCR 236
R v Pozniak, [1994] 3 SCR 310
R v Matheson, [1994] 3 SCR 328
R v Harper, [1994] 3 SCR 343
R v Cobham, [1994] 3 SCR 360
Case name Argued Decided Lamer La Forest L'Heureux-Dubé Sopinka Gonthier Cory McLachlin Iacobucci Major
Québec (Communauté urbaine) v Corp Notre-Dame de Bon-Secours, [1994] 3 SCR 3
Buanderie centrale de Montréal Inc v Montreal (City of); Conseil de la santé et des services sociaux de la région de Montréal métropolitain v Montreal (City of), [1994] 3 SCR 29
Partagec Inc v Québec (Communauté urbaine), [1994] 3 SCR 57
R v Daviault, [1994] 3 SCR 63
R v Kent, [1994] 3 SCR 133
R v Borden, [1994] 3 SCR 145
Hodgkinson v Simms, [1994] 3 SCR 377
R v Swietlinski, [1994] 3 SCR 481
Gaudet v Marchand, [1994] 3 SCR 514
R v Haughton, [1994] 3 SCR 516
R v Levasseur, [1994] 3 SCR 518
R v K (A), [1994] 3 SCR 520
R v S (WD), [1994] 3 SCR 521
Webster v British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority, [1994] 3 SCR 549
Thomson v Thomson, [1994] 3 SCR 551
Case name Argued Decided Lamer La Forest L'Heureux-Dubé Sopinka Gonthier Cory McLachlin Iacobucci Major
Native Women's Assn of Canada v Canada, [1994] 3 SCR 627
Willick v Willick, [1994] 3 SCR 670
R v Brown, [1994] 3 SCR 749
TransGas Ltd v Mid-Plains Contractors Ltd, [1994] 3 SCR 753
R v Ferris, [1994] 3 SCR 756
R v H (LM), [1994] 3 SCR 758
R v Dubasz, [1994] 3 SCR 759
R v Heywood, [1994] 3 SCR 761
R v Huot, [1994] 3 SCR 827
R v Whitley, [1994] 3 SCR 830
R v Feldman, [1994] 3 SCR 832
Caisse populaire de Charlesbourg v Beauport (City of), [1994] 3 SCR 833
Dagenais v Canadian Broadcasting Corp, [1994] 3 SCR 835
R v S (T), [1994] 3 SCR 952
R v Laba, [1994] 3 SCR 965
Case name Argued Decided Lamer La Forest L'Heureux-Dubé Sopinka Gonthier Cory McLachlin Iacobucci Major
R v Pizzardi; R v Levis, [1994] 3 SCR 1018
R v Dikah, [1994] 3 SCR 1020
Tolofson v Jensen; Lucas (Litigation Guardian of) v Gagnon, [1994] 3 SCR 1022
Patterson v Gallant, [1994] 3 SCR 1080
R v Bisson, [1994] 3 SCR 1097
Apotex Inc v Canada (AG), [1994] 3 SCR 1100

References[]

Retrieved from ""