2014 Judgments of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

This is a list of the judgments given by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in the year 2014. They are ordered by neutral citation.

In 2014 Lord Neuberger was the President of the Supreme Court, Lady Hale was the Deputy President.

The table lists judgments made by the court and the opinions of the judges in each case. Judges are treated as having concurred in another's judgment when they either formally attach themselves to the judgment of another or speak only to acknowledge their concurrence with one or more judges. Any judgment which reaches a conclusion that differs from the majority on one or more major points of the appeal has been treated as dissent.

All dates are for 2014 unless expressly stated otherwise.

Table key[]

Delivered a judgment (majority)

Concurred in the judgment of another justice (majority)

Delivered a judgment (dissenting)

Concurred in the judgment of another justice (dissent)

Did not participate in the decision

2014 judgments[]

Case name	Citation	Argued	Decided	Neuberger	Hale	Mance	Kerr	Clarke	Wilson	Sumption	Reed	Carnwath	Hughes	Toulson	Hodge
	[2014] UKSC 1	11 November 2013	15 January
	[2014] UKSC 2	3 December 2013	22 January
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport^[1]	[2014] UKSC 3	15-16 October 2013	22 January
	[2014] UKSC 4	5 December 2013	29 January
	[2014] UKSC 5	11 December 2013	29 January
	[2014] UKSC 6	26 November 2013	29 January
	[2014] UKSC 7	15 January	5 February
	[2014] UKSC 8	12 November 2013	5 February
	[2014] UKSC 9	18-19 November 2013	12 February
	[2014] UKSC 10	4-5 November 2013	19 February
	[2014] UKSC 11	25-26 November 2013	19 February
	[2014] UKSC 12	6-7 November 2013	19 February
	[2014] UKSC 13	12-14 November 2013	26 February
	[2014] UKSC 14	16 January	26 February
	[2014] UKSC 15	20 November 2013	5 March
	[2014] UKSC 16	29-30 January	5 March
R (British Sky Broadcasting Ltd) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis	[2014] UKSC 17	3 December 2013	12 March
^[2]	[2014] UKSC 18	3-5 February	12 March
^[1]^[3]	[2014] UKSC 19	21-23 October 2013	19 March
^[1]	[2014] UKSC 20	29 & 31 October 2013	26 March
	[2014] UKSC 21	28 January	26 March
	[2014] UKSC 22	20-21 January	2 April
	[2014] UKSC 23	5 December 2013	2 April
British Telecommunications plc v Telefónica O2 Ltd	[2014] UKSC 24	3-4 February	9 April
	[2014] UKSC 25	22-23 January	8 May
	[2014] UKSC 26	24-25 February	8 May
	[2014] UKSC 27	17 March	8 May
	[2014] UKSC 28	4 March	14 May
	[2014] UKSC 29	8 April	15 May
	[2014] UKSC 30	5-6 March	21 May
	[2014] UKSC 31	2 April	21 May
	[2014] UKSC 32	24-25 March	21 May
	[2014] UKSC 33	19-20 February	11 June
	[2014] UKSC 34	27-28 November 2013	11 June
	[2014] UKSC 35	9-10 December 2013	18 June
	[2014] UKSC 36	10-11 February	18 June
	[2014] UKSC 37	13 March	18 June
R (Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice^[4]^[5]	[2014] UKSC 38	16-19 December 2013	25 June
	[2014] UKSC 39	26 March	2 July
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilities Water plc	[2014] UKSC 40	6-7 May	2 July
	[2014] UKSC 41	14 May	2 July
British Telecommunications plc v Telefónica O2 Ltd	[2014] UKSC 42	3-4 February	9 July
^[6]	[2014] UKSC 43	17-18 February	9 July
	[2014] UKSC 44	4 June	16 July
FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC^[1]^[7]	[2014] UKSC 45	17-19 June	16 July
	[2014] UKSC 46	12 May	23 July
Hounga v Allen	[2014] UKSC 47	31 March-1 April	30 July
	[2014] UKSC 48	7 April	30 July
	[2014] UKSC 49	23 June	30 July
	[2014] UKSC 50	19 March	9 September
	[2014] UKSC 51	3 December 2013	18 September
^[8]	[2014] UKSC 52	3-4 March	22 October
^[9]	[2014] UKSC 53	12-13 February	22 October
	[2014] UKSC 54	30 June	22 October
	[2014] UKSC 55	10 June	29 October
	[2014] UKSC 56	19 June	29 October
	[2014] UKSC 57	1 May	5 November
AIB Group (UK) v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors	[2014] UKSC 58	5 June	5 November
	[2014] UKSC 59	11-12 June	5 November
	[2014] UKSC 60	13 May	12 November
	[2014] UKSC 61	11-12 June	12 November
^[1]	[2014] UKSC 62	23-24 & 26 June	12 November
^[1]	[2014] UKSC 63	23-24 & 26 June	12 November
	[2014] UKSC 64	13 October	26 November
	[2014] UKSC 65	21 October	3 December
^[10]	[2014] UKSC 66	19-21 May	10 December
^[1]	[2014] UKSC 67	24 July	17 December
	[2014] UKSC 68	11 November	17 December

Notes[]

^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g An augmented panel of 7 judges sat in this case.
^ The Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson, also sat on this case. He agreed with the majority.
^ The chart shows the judgment of the court in the case of P. Two other appeals (from MIG and MEG) were held concurrently and allowed by a majority of 4 to 3 (Lords Clarke, Carnwath and Hodge dissenting).
^ An augmented panel of 9 judges sat in this case
^ The chart shows the judgment by the court in the appeals by Nicklinson and Lamb. It also unanimously allowed an appeal by the DPP and dismissed a cross-appeal by Martin.
^ Lord Thomas also sat on this case. He gave the lead judgment alongside Lord Reed.
^ Lord Collins also sat on this case. He agreed with the majority.
^ Lord Collins also sat on this case. He gave a judgment for the majority that Lord Sumption agreed with.
^ The chart shows the decision for the appeal. The decision on the cross-appeal was by a majority of four to one (Lady Hale dissenting).
^ The chart shows the judgment of the court in the appeal of Haney, Kaiyam and Massey. The article 5 appeal by Robinson was dismissed by a majority of four to one (Lord Mance dissenting).

External links[]

Supreme Court decided cases, 2014

[7_judges-1] ^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g An augmented panel of 7 judges sat in this case.

[2] The Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson, also sat on this case. He agreed with the majority.

[3] The chart shows the judgment of the court in the case of P. Two other appeals (from MIG and MEG) were held concurrently and allowed by a majority of 4 to 3 (Lords Clarke, Carnwath and Hodge dissenting).

[4] An augmented panel of 9 judges sat in this case

[5] The chart shows the judgment by the court in the appeals by Nicklinson and Lamb. It also unanimously allowed an appeal by the DPP and dismissed a cross-appeal by Martin.

[6] Lord Thomas also sat on this case. He gave the lead judgment alongside Lord Reed.

[7] Lord Collins also sat on this case. He agreed with the majority.

[8] Lord Collins also sat on this case. He gave a judgment for the majority that Lord Sumption agreed with.

[9] The chart shows the decision for the appeal. The decision on the cross-appeal was by a majority of four to one (Lady Hale dissenting).

[10] The chart shows the judgment of the court in the appeal of Haney, Kaiyam and Massey. The article 5 appeal by Robinson was dismissed by a majority of four to one (Lord Mance dissenting).

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]