Aronson v. Lewis
Aronson v. Lewis | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Court | Delaware Supreme Court |
Decided | March 1, 1984 |
Citation(s) | 473 A.2d 805 |
Court membership | |
Judge(s) sitting | , Andrew G. T. Moore II, Andrew D. Christie |
Case opinions | |
Decision by | Moore |
Keywords | |
|
Aronson v Lewis, 473 A.2d 805 (Del. 1984),[1] is a US corporate law case, from Delaware concerning the possibility of a shareholder to bring a derivative suit.
Facts[]
A shareholder claimed that the directors of Meyers Parking System Inc. had improperly wasted corporate assets. The CEO, Mr Fink, then 75 years old, was also a 47% shareholder and its founder. It was alleged he personally selected the other directors. They had given to Mr Fink a generous five year employment contract, a subsequent term as a consultant with a large salary, and an annual bonus equal to 5% of the company's pre tax profits. The contract also said that this continued regardless of Mr Fink's continued ability to perform the job.
Judgment[]
Justice Moore rejected the claim on the ground that the plaintiff had not shown that making a demand on the board would have been futile. He held that the 'business judgment rule' was applicable. This meant,
a presumption that in making a business decision, the directors of a corporation acted on an informed basis in good faith and in the honest belief that the action was taken in the best interests of the company.[2]
See also[]
- United States corporate law
- UK company law
References[]
- ^ Aronson v. Lewis, 473 A.2d 805 (Del. 1984).
This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
- ^ Aronson, 473 A.2d at 812.
External links[]
- Text of Aronson v Lewis, 473 A.2d 805 (Del. 1984) is available from: CourtListener Google Scholar Justia
- United States corporate case law
- Delaware state case law
- 1984 in Delaware
- 1984 in United States case law