Battle of Tốt Động – Chúc Động

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Battle of Tốt Động – Chúc Động
Part of Lam Sơn uprising
Trận Tốt Động Chúc Động 1426.jpg
DateDecember 4, 1426
Location
Tốt Động, , Hanoi
Result Vietnamese victory
Belligerents
Lam Sơn Ming Dynasty
Commanders and leaders



Nguyễn Xí




Li An

Ma Ying
Strength
6,000[1] Vietnamese source:
100,000
Chinese source:
54,000
Casualties and losses
A few hundred killed Vietnamese source:
50,000 killed
10,000 captured.[2]
Chinese source:
20,000–30,000 killed[3]

The Battle of Tốt Động – Chúc Động (Chinese: 崒洞祝洞之戰) in 1426 was the decisive battle in the 14-year Lam Sơn uprising which established Vietnam's independence from Ming China in 1428. The battle took place on 4 December 1426 in the Red River Delta between Tốt Động and Chúc Động, two villages of Chương Mỹ District, near Hanoi. Armed with hand cannons, the Vietnamese force of 3,000-men under Lê Lợi, the Prince of Pacification, was able to stage a successful ambush on the attacking Ming army under General .[4][5] The Ming army was decisively routed.[6] As a result, most of the Chinese weapons, supplies, and horses were captured by the Vietnamese. Wang Tong was forced to retreat back to Hanoi, where four days later he and the city were besieged by Le Loi's army.[4]

Background[]

After the Ming Dynasty conquered Dai Viet in 1407, a series of successive uprisings occurred, culminating in the Lam Sơn uprising led by Lê Lợi. Originating in Thanh Hoa in 1418, the revolt gradually achieved success, and by 1426 the province of Nghệ An and most lands south of it had fallen under rebel control.[7] With this, the Lam Sơn rebels shifted their attention to the north, where the Ming still controlled territory.

Prelude[]

Le Loi’s forces began advancing north. By November, general Lý Triện’s forward detachments had arrived near Đông Quan. The Ming garrison assumed that this was the main Lam Sơn army, and went out to confront them near Ninh Kiều. The Ming were defeated, suffering 2000 casualties.[8] 3 days after the initial engagement, another engagement occurred at the Nhân Mục bridge, in which another thousand Ming soldiers reportedly became casualties. The deteriorating situation forced generals Li An and Fang Zheng to withdraw their forces from Nghe An by sea and general Ma Ying to redeploy forces in order to rescue Đông Quan, as reinforcements from Yunnan had been ambushed by Trịnh Khả and fled to the citadel of Tam Giang.[9] Together, these forces bolstered the garrison of Đông Quan.

Battle[]

In early December, Wang Tong led his armies out of the citadel of Dong Quan in order to attack the Lam Son rebels. They split into three wings to attack from multiple directions. Ly Trien’s forces skirmished with one, and feigned a retreat past the Tam La bridge, an area filled with mud and rice paddies. The Ming were bogged down and ambushed, with Vietnamese sources claiming that a thousand were killed and five hundred captured.[10]

On the 6th, Ly Trien’s forces moved forward, but the Ming had set an ambush, setting up spiked bamboo barricades. The war elephants of the rebels treaded on these spikes and stampeded, causing a temporary retreat. Lý Triện and Đố Bí pulled back, requesting reinforcements. The request was received by formations under the command of Nguyen Xi, Truong Chien and Dinh Le, who dispatched 3000 men as reinforcements and 2 war elephants. Several Ming spies were caught, and the generals discovered that Wang Tong was stationed in Ninh Kiều, planning to secretly position troops behind the small Lam Son force while crossing the river with the main body. [11]

The plan was that upon hearing enemy weapons fire, the entire Ming force would concentrate its arrows upon the enemy formation and attack. However, Đinh Lễ and Lý Triện discovered this, and ordered their troops to remain silent and not move. Due to this, the Ming assumed there were no nearby enemies, and took a shortcut. The Ming walked into an ambush near the Yên Duyệt River, in which the Lam Son forces suddenly emerged and advanced into the villages of Tột Động and Chúc Động, surprising and routing the Ming forces who attempted to flee across the river. Thousands were killed in the melee, and many more reportedly drowned, with Vietnamese sources claiming that 50000 Ming soldiers died along with 10000 being captured as prisoners of war .[12]Wang Tong himself was wounded, and fled with Ma Qi back to Dong Quan.

Aftermath[]

The battle was a decisive victory for the Lam Son army, with a superior Ming force having been defeated. The Ming lost heavy amounts of weaponry and suffered heavy casualties. Casualty estimates range, with Vietnamese sources claiming 50000 Ming troops dead and 10000 captured, while the Ming Shilu estimates that around 20000 to 30000 soldiers died in that battle.[13] This victory allowed the Vietnamese to encircle the citadel of Dong Quan[14] and ruined Wang Tong’s plans for an offensive. The battle contributed significantly to the eventual victory of the Lam Son Uprising, and was commemorated in the Binh Ngo Dai Cao[15]

References[]

  1. ^ Geoff Wade, translator, Southeast Asia in the Ming Shi-lu: an open access resource, Singapore: Asia Research Institute and the Singapore E-Press, National University of Singapore, http://www.epress.nus.edu.sg/msl/reign/xuan-de/year-1-month-3-day-13
  2. ^ 《大越史记全书》、《蓝山实录
  3. ^ 《明史·王通传》
  4. ^ a b Sun 2006, p. 85.
  5. ^ Sun Laichen (2003), "Chinese Military Technology and Dai Viet: c.1390-1597," Asia Research Institute Working Paper Series, No.11, September.
  6. ^ Larry H. Addington America's war in Vietnam: a short narrative history 2000 Page 5 - "When Le Loi's forces were finally strong enough to risk a decisive battle at Tot Dong in the Red River valley in 1426, they so routed the Chinese army that two years later China effectively recognized the Viet kingdom's independence by granting it the status of a tributary client"
  7. ^ Taylor, K.W (2013). A History of the Vietnamese. Cambridge University Press. p. 184.
  8. ^ Đại việt sử ký toàn thư. Hanoi: . 1993. pp. 337–338.
  9. ^ Đại việt sử ký toàn thư. Hanoi: . 1993. p. 338.
  10. ^ Đại việt sử ký toàn thư. Hanoi: . 1993. pp. 338–39.
  11. ^ Đại việt sử ký toàn thư. . 1993. p. 339.
  12. ^ Đại Việt thông sử. . 1976. p. 276.
  13. ^ Sun Laichen (2003)
  14. ^ Lam Sơn thực lục. . 1956.
  15. ^ Lam Sơn thực lục, Tân Việt Publishing House, (1956) book 3, translated by Mạc Bảo Thần

Bibliography[]

  • Sun, Laichen (2006), "Chinese Gunpowder Technology and Đại Việt, ca. 1390–1497", in Reid, Anthony; Tran, Nhung Tuyet (eds.), Viet Nam: Borderless Histories, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 72–120
  • Tsai, Shih-shan Henry (2011). Perpetual Happiness: The Ming Emperor Yongle. University of Washington Press.


Retrieved from ""