Black–white binary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For other uses, see Black and White.

In critical race theory, the black–white binary is a paradigm through which racial history is presented as a linear story between White and Black Americans.[1] This binary has largely defined how civil rights legislation is approached in the United States, as African Americans led most of the major racial justice movements that informed civil rights era reformation.[2] The paradigm conceptualizes Black and White people as the two predominant racial groups, viewing all racism accordant to anti-blackness, and the Black–White relation as central to racial analysis.[3] According to critical race scholars, the binary acts to govern racial classifications and describe how race is understood and approached politically and socially throughout American history.[4]

While the black–white binary defines how racism has been widely approached in the United States, many scholars of color have scrutinized the concept for contributing to the marginalization of non-Black people of color, and omitting them from American civil rights history.[1] Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic propose a criticism of the black–white binary in an introductory book on critical race theory, arguing that because anti-discrimination law is designed with African American civil rights in mind, it fails to address the forms of discrimination that non-Black people of color experience.[5] This legal blind spot, they argued, leaves non-Black racial minorities less protected by civil rights laws.

Non-Black and non-White racial groups, such as Asian Americans and Native Americans, are understood as being positioned in relation to blackness and whiteness.[4] The measurement of non-Black, non-White racial groups through this binary led to the concept of white adjacency, which refers to racial groups considered adjacent to whiteness.[6] The application of white adjacency to Asian Americans through the model minority myth further marginalizes Asian Americans under the black–white binary, measuring them by their perceived proximity to whiteness, and their subsequent positional opposition to blackness.[7]

References[]

  1. ^ a b Perea, Juan (1997). "The Black/White Binary Paradigm of Race: The "Normal Science" of American Racial Thought". California Law Review, La Raza Journal. 85: 1213. doi:10.2307/3481059.
  2. ^ Brooks, Roy L. (1994). "In Defense of the Black/White Binary: Reclaiming a Tradition of Civil Rights Scholarship". Berkely Law: 107–112.
  3. ^ Westmoreland, Peter (2013). "Racism in a Black White Binary: On the Reaction to Trayvon Martin's Death". University of Florida Law Scholarship: 1, 2.
  4. ^ a b Martín Alcoff, Linda (2003). "Latino/As, Asian Americans, and the Black-White Binary". The Journal of Ethics. 7: 5–7.
  5. ^ Delgado, Richard &, Stefancic, Jean (2017). Critical Race Theory: An Introduction (Third ed.). NYU Press. p. 76. ISBN 978-1479802760.
  6. ^ Rahman, Rhea (2021). "Racializing the Good Muslim: Muslim White Adjacency and Black Muslim Activism in South Africa". Religions. doi:10.3390/rel12010058.
  7. ^ Lee, Phillip (2021). "Lee, P. (2021). Rejecting Honorary Whiteness: Asian Americans and the Attack on Race-Conscious Admissions. Emory Law Journal, 70(7), 1475-1506". Emory Law Journal. 70 (7): 1494–1498.
Retrieved from ""