Coleman–Liau index

This article has multiple issues. Please help or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (July 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help by introducing citations to additional sources. Find sources:  –  ·  ·  · scholar · JSTOR (July 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Part of a series on
Reading
Learning to read
Learning to read
Scientific theories and models
Dual route theory Simple view of reading Science of reading Scarborough's Reading Rope The active view of reading model
Cognitive processes
Comprehension Phonemic awareness Phonological awareness Subvocalization Word recognition
Reading instruction
Analytic phonics Basal reader Guided reading Independent reading Literature circle Phonics Reciprocal teaching Structured word inquiry Synthetic phonics Teaching reading Whole language
Reading rate
Fluency Slow reading Speed reading
Readability
Readability Readability test
Reading differences and disabilities
Dyslexia Hyperlexia Reading disability Reading for special needs
Language
Alphabetic principle Braille Dolch word list Grapheme History of printing Language Languages by writing system Morpheme Orthography Phoneme Sight word Vocabulary Writing Writing system
Literacy
Children's literature Critical literacy Close reading Distant reading Great books Literacy Literature Literary criticism Functional illiteracy Family literacy
v t

The Coleman–Liau index is a readability test designed by and to gauge the understandability of a text. Like the Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning fog index, SMOG index, and Automated Readability Index, its output approximates the U.S. grade level thought necessary to comprehend the text.

Like the ARI but unlike most of the other indices, Coleman–Liau relies on characters instead of syllables per word. Although opinion varies on its accuracy as compared to the syllable/word and complex word indices, characters are more readily and accurately counted by computer programs than are syllables.

The Coleman–Liau index was designed to be easily calculated mechanically from samples of hard-copy text. Unlike syllable-based readability indices, it does not require that the character content of words be analyzed, only their length in characters. Therefore, it could be used in conjunction with theoretically simple mechanical scanners that would only need to recognize character, word, and sentence boundaries, removing the need for full optical character recognition or manual keypunching.

Formula[]

The Coleman–Liau index is calculated with the following formula:

${\displaystyle CLI=0.0588{L}-0.296{S}-15.8\,\!}$

L is the average number of letters per 100 words and S is the average number of sentences per 100 words.

As an example, we shall use the abstract from Coleman and Liau's original 1975 paper introducing the index:

Existing computer programs that measure readability are based largely upon subroutines which estimate number of syllables, usually by counting vowels. The shortcoming in estimating syllables is that it necessitates keypunching the prose into the computer. There is no need to estimate syllables since word length in letters is a better predictor of readability than word length in syllables. Therefore, a new readability formula was computed that has for its predictors letters per 100 words and sentences per 100 words. Both predictors can be counted by an optical scanning device, and thus the formula makes it economically feasible for an organization such as the U.S. Office of Education to calibrate the readability of all textbooks for the public school system.

The abstract contains 5 sentences, 119 words, and 639 letters or digits; L is 537 and S is 4.20 obtained by the formulas:

L = Letters ÷ Words × 100 = 639 ÷ 119 × 100 ≈ 537

S = Sentences ÷ Words × 100 = 5 ÷ 119 × 100 ≈ 4.20

${\displaystyle CLI=0.0588\times 537-0.296\times 4.20-15.8=14.5\,\!}$

Therefore, the abstract is at a grade level of 14.5, or roughly appropriate for a second-year undergraduate.

See also[]

• Readability
• Zipf's law

References[]

• Coleman, Meri; and Liau, T. L. (1975); A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 60, pp. 283–284