Dacian art

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dacian art is the art associated with the peoples known as Dacians or North Thracians; The Dacians created an art style in which the influences of Scythians and the Greeks can be seen. They were highly skilled in gold and silver working and in pottery making. Pottery was white with red decorations in floral, geometric, and stylized animal motifs. Similar decorations were worked in metal, especially the figure of a horse, which was common on Dacian coins.[1]

Background[]

Dacians regions cf. Strabo (ca. 20 AD) by Muller (1877) [2]
Dacian gold bowl found in Transylvania (Vienna Museum)

The Geto-Dacians lived in a very large territory, stretching from the Balkans to the northern Carpathians and from the Black Sea and the river Tyras to the Tisa plain, sometimes even to the Middle Danube.[3] Between 15th-12th century, the Dacian-Getae culture was influenced by the Bronze Age Tumulus-Urnfield warriors.[4]


Dacian civilization went through several stages of development, from the Thracian stage in the Bronze Age to the classical period of the Geto-Dacians (the first century BC to the first century AD).[5] In the Bronze Age, proto-Thracian populations emerged from the fusion of the local Eneolithic (Chalcolithic) stock with the intruders of the transitional Indo-Europeanization Period. From these proto-Thracians, in the Iron Age, there were developed the Dacians of the Danubian-Carpathian Area on the one hand and the Thracians of the eastern Balkan Peninsula on the other.[6]

Pre-Dacian periods[]

North Thracian population was chiefly an Early Bronze Age mix of the descendants of intrusive stockbreeding people and of survivors of the autochthonous Chalcolithic culture that the newcomers had destroyed. In this ethnic synthesis which gave birth to the Thracian people, the former predominated but, especially in the more mountainous areas, vestiges of Chalcolithic traditions survived through the Early and into the Middle Bronze Age.[7]

The local, Daco-Thracian art should not be mistaken for the art of the Thracians south of the Balkans although mutual influences had undoubtedly appeared.[8]


Thracian art was typically geometric in its decoration, a taste which was a remnant of Late Bronze Age traditions.[9] While the Thracian tribes adopted-no doubt from the Scythians-some aspects of mounted nomadism in the first millennium B.C., they also preserved many traditions of the European Bronze Age and belonged more to the world of European cultures than to that of the East.[10]

Classical Dacian periods[]

The 1st century BC silver work from the lower Danube region consists mostly of bracelets and fibulae alongside of a small number of decorative disks, plaques, and bowls. To distinguish it from earlier Thracian silver work, one might label this later silver work as Geto-Dacian or Geto-Thracian depending on whether is found above or below the lower Danube.[11]


The design of Geto-Dacian helmets (i.e. Ciumesti, Iron Gate) is sufficiently unusual in ancient art to offer the opportunity to trace it to its origin, and, thereby, provide some insight into the Scythian elements that went into the formation of early Dacian art and the means by which ancient Oriental motifs survived and were transmitted into Europe[12] Almost identical in decoration and details of craftsmanship are the two silver beakers, now in Bucharest and New York and unquestionably were made in the same metalsmith shop as the helmet.[12]

Gallery[]

  • 00Tezaur MNIR IMG 6195.JPG
  • 00Tezaur MNIR IMG 6194.JPG
  • 00Tezaur MNIR IMG 6196.JPG
  • 00TezaurMNIRIMG 6042.JPG
  • 00MINIRDACIAN SILVERIMG 6120.JPG
  • Coif getic tezaurul de la Peretu detaliu MNIR.jpg
  • Peretu Helmet side view Muzeul National de Istorie al Romaniei.jpg
  • Helmet of Cotofenesti at the National Museum of Romanian History 2011 - Mythological Scene on the Back.jpg
  • Helmet of Cotofenesti at the National Museum of Romanian History 2011 - Front View.jpg
  • Dacian Gold Bracelet at the National Museum of Romanian History 2011 - 2.jpg
  • TezaurulRomanieiMNIRGeticHelmet.JPG
  • ThumbMNIR Tezaur 1112.JPG
  • ThumbMNIRGoldArtefacts.JPG
  • ThumbMNIRTEZAUR.JPG
  • Dacian fibulae Cluj Musem 1st century BC.jpg
  • Dacian Silver Fibulae.jpg
  • Dacian silver.jpg
  • Dacian shiels.jpg
  • 2007 07260190.jpg
  • Classical type of Dacian-Hallstattian gold bracelet.jpg
  • Dacian Silver clasp Posaga.JPG
  • Sword hilt Dacia (Covoru, Brasov).jpg
  • Helmet and standard.JPG
  • Dacian shield and helmets.JPG

See also[]

Notes[]

  1. ^ Waldman & Mason 2006, p. 208.
  2. ^ Müller 1877, tabulae XV.
  3. ^ MacKenzie 1986, p. 25.
  4. ^ Mountain 1998, p. 59.
  5. ^ Giurescu & Nestorescu 1981, p. 47.
  6. ^ Dumitrescu & Boardman 1982, p. 53.
  7. ^ Hoddinott 1989, p. 52.
  8. ^ Popescu 1971, p. 62.
  9. ^ Farkas 1981, p. 37.
  10. ^ Farkas 1981, p. 33.
  11. ^ Olmsted 2001, p. 22.
  12. ^ Jump up to: a b Goldman 1970, p. 904.

References[]

  • Dumitrescu, V; Boardman (1982). The Prehistory of Romania: from the earliest times to IOOO B.C. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521224963.
  • Farkas, Anne (1981). Style and Subject Matter in Native Thracian Art pp 33-48. 16. METROPOLITAN MUSEUM JOURNAL.
  • Goldman, Bernard (1970). "DACIAN ART AND THE EAGLE-HARE MOTIF". Bericht, International Union of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences. Oxford University Press.
  • Hoddinott, R.F. (1989). "Thracians, Mycenaeans and "The Trojan Question"". Thracians and Mycenaeans: Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Thracology Rotterdam, 24-26 September 1984 edited by Jan G. P. Best and Nanny M. W. de Vries. Brill Academic Pub. ISBN 978-9004088641.
  • MacKenzie, Andrew (1986). Archaeology in Romania: the mystery of the Roman occupation. Hale. ISBN 9780709027249.
  • Mountain, Harry (1998). The Celtic Encyclopedia. Universal Publishers. ISBN 978-1581128901.
  • Müller, Karl Otfried (1877). Strabonis Geographicorum by Strabo. Ambrosio Firmin-Didot.
  • Olmsted, Garrett (2001). Celtic art in transition during the first century BC. Innsbruck : Archaeolingua Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität, Abteilung Sprachwissenschaft. ISBN 9783851242034.

Further reading[]

Retrieved from ""