Dense-in-itself

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In general topology, a subset of a topological space is said to be dense-in-itself[1][2] or crowded[3][4] if has no isolated point. Equivalently, is dense-in-itself if every point of is a limit point of . Thus is dense-in-itself if and only if , where is the derived set of .

A dense-in-itself closed set is called a perfect set. (In other words, a perfect set is a closed set without isolated point.)

The notion of dense set is unrelated to dense-in-itself. This can sometimes be confusing, as "X is dense in X" (always true) is not the same as "X is dense-in-itself" (no isolated point).

Examples[]

A simple example of a set which is dense-in-itself but not closed (and hence not a perfect set) is the subset of irrational numbers (considered as a subset of the real numbers). This set is dense-in-itself because every neighborhood of an irrational number contains at least one other irrational number . On the other hand, the set of irrationals is not closed because every rational number lies in its closure. For similar reasons, the set of rational numbers (also considered as a subset of the real numbers) is also dense-in-itself but not closed.

The above examples, the irrationals and the rationals, are also dense sets in their topological space, namely . As an example that is dense-in-itself but not dense in its topological space, consider . This set is not dense in but is dense-in-itself.

Properties[]

  • The union of any family of dense-in-itself subsets of a space X is dense-in-itself.[5]
  • Every open subset of a dense-in-itself space is dense-in-itself.[6]
  • Every dense subset of a dense-in-itself T1 space is dense-in-itself.[7] Note that this requires the space to be T1; for example in the space with the indiscrete topology, the set is dense, but is not dense-in-itself.
  • A singleton subset of a space is never dense-in-itself (because its unique point is isolated in it).
  • In a topological space, the closure of a dense-it-itself set is a perfect set.[8]

See also[]

Notes[]

  1. ^ Steen & Seebach, p. 6
  2. ^ Engelking, p. 25
  3. ^ Levy, Ronnie; Porter, Jack (1996). "On Two questions of Arhangel'skii and Collins regarding submaximal spaces" (PDF). Topology Proceedings. 21: 143–154.
  4. ^ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228597275_a-Scattered_spaces_II
  5. ^ Engelking, 1.7.10, p. 59
  6. ^ Kuratowski, p. 78
  7. ^ Kuratowski, p. 78
  8. ^ Kuratowski, p. 77

References[]

  • Engelking, Ryszard (1989). General Topology. Heldermann Verlag, Berlin. ISBN 3-88538-006-4.
  • Kuratowski, K. (1966). Topology Vol. I. Academic Press. ISBN 012429202X.
  • Steen, Lynn Arthur; Seebach, J. Arthur Jr. (1978). Counterexamples in Topology (Dover reprint of 1978 ed.). Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-486-68735-3. MR 0507446.

This article incorporates material from Dense in-itself on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.

Retrieved from ""