Disability Day of Mourning

Autism rights movement
Philosophy Bodily autonomy Disability rights movement Independent living movement Neurodiversity paradigm Self-advocacy
Organizations Aspies For Freedom Autism National Committee Autism Network International Autistic Self Advocacy Network Autistic Women & Nonbinary Network National Autistic Society
Events Autistic Pride Day Disability Day of Mourning
Issues Ableism Anti-autism All in a Row Applied behavior analysis Augmentative and alternative communication Autism-friendly Autism Speaks Communication Shutdown Community integration Controversies in autism Deinstitutionalisation Disability-selective abortion Ethical challenges to autism treatment Eugenics Facilitated communication Filicide Inclusion in education Inclusion as a right Judge Rotenberg Educational Center Ole Ivar Lovaas Social model of disability Societal and cultural aspects of autism Universal Design for Learning
People Mel Baggs Simon Baron-Cohen Julia Bascom Lydia Brown William Davenport Michelle Dawson govy Temple Grandin Roy Richard Grinker Morénike Giwa-Onaiwu Daniel Lightwing Thomas A. McKean Ari Ne'eman Shain Neumeier Alex Plank John Elder Robison Stephen Shore Steve Silberman Jim Sinclair Donna Williams
Films Citizen Autistic Loving Lampposts Neurotypical
Criticism Pro-cure perspective National Council on Severe Autism Matthew Belmonte Manuel Casanova Jill Escher Michael Fitzpatrick Bruce Hall David Miedzianik Jonathan Mitchell Jonathan Shestack Alison Singer
v t

The Disability Day of Mourning is observed annually on 1 March^[1] as a commemoration of disabled people who have been murdered by caregivers, especially parents. First observed in 2012 and propagated by disability rights organizations such as Not Dead Yet and the Autistic Self Advocacy Network, the Disability Day of Mourning aims to bring attention to the issue of filicide of disabled children and adults, and the degree to which such murders are treated as different to or more "acceptable" than similar murders of abled people.

The Disability Day of Mourning has become a significant part of the disability rights movement, attracting attention from politicians and the media. In addition to its pioneering by disability rights groups, it has also gained attention and support amongst mainstream disability support-focused organizations.

History[]

The Disability Day of Mourning was created in 2012 by , director of advocacy at the Autistic Self Advocacy Network.^[1] However, the broader concept of vigils held to memorialise murdered disabled people originated in the early 2000s, itself as an extension of lists of murder victims passed around advocacy communities for years prior.^[2] The primary inciting incident for the Disability Day of Mourning was the coverage of the murder of George Hodgins, a 22-year-old autistic man killed by his mother Elizabeth in a murder-suicide; mainstream news coverage focused on Elizabeth as a "devoted and loving" mother while treating George as a "high-maintenance" burden whose disability apparently justified his death.^[1]

The Disability Day of Mourning also exists in part as a reaction to disability-related days that focus on the abled perspective, such as Disability Awareness Day, a pedagogical phenomenon where abled students use disability simulators to try and mimic the experience of being disabled, such as blindfolds to learn about the experience of blind people. Such simulators are controversial amongst disability rights activists, due to their poor relationship with the lived experience of disabled people.^[3]

Observance[]

The Disability Day of Mourning is observed by the holding of vigils in cities worldwide and by the cataloguing of disabled murder victims on disability rights websites.^[4] Many are held on college campuses, such as Syracuse University^[5] and the University of Maryland.^[6] In addition to the United States, vigils have been held in places such as Canada,^[7] Scotland,^[8] Australia, and China.^[1] In 2021, due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, global vigils were held online.^[7]

A particular focus of the Disability Day of Mourning is the sentencing gap between murders of disabled and abled victims. Activism has focused on how murder charges have been reduced to manslaughter^[9] and perpetrators freed after prison sentences as short as three years.^[10] According to statistics from the Ruderman Family Foundation, one disabled person is murdered by a family member or caregiver each week; many of the murderers are acquitted or serve little to no prison time.^[11] Another major focus is the media coverage of such murders, which frequently quotes friends and relatives of the murderers, and even other caregivers of disabled people, as being sympathetic to the crime.^[1] The perceived media bias also extends to depicting disabled children and adults as more physically violent or threatening than the reality, such as when Max Benson, a 5 ft 3 in (1.60 m) 13-year-old autistic boy who was killed by the negligent behaviour of his teachers, was portrayed as an aggressive 6 ft 1 in (1.85 m) man in early media coverage.^[12][13]

The vigils feature the reading of names of murdered disabled people; due to the number of names, readings are usually restricted only to those murdered since the previous vigil.^[1] The Disability Memorial website collects a more complete list of names, stretching back to 1980.^[4] Many vigils also feature disabled survivors of abuse, such as institution survivors, talking about their experiences.^[14] Other common aspects include a moment of silence and the lighting of candles.^[8]

The primary organization involved in the Disability Day of Mourning is the Autistic Self Advocacy Network, and the day was originally organized by its members.^[1] However, people with many disabilities, not just autism, organize and attend Disability Day of Mourning events.^[14] Other organizations involved in popularising and hosting events include Not Dead Yet, the , the National Council on Independent Living, and the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund.^[15]

Impact[]

When Gross first originated the Disability Day of Mourning concept, she was surprised to receive pushback, with opponents describing the concept as "anti-parent" and as stigmatizing towards the parents of disabled children. However, over time, perception of the Disability Day of Mourning has grown more positive. In 2016, the White House liaison to the disability community under then-President Barack Obama read a statement from the President at the Washington D.C. event.^[1]

The Autistic Self Advocacy Network provides an "Anti-Filicide Toolkit", which aims to prevent murders of disabled children and adults and to provide ways to discuss such murders if they happen in a reader's community.^[16] The Disability Day of Mourning has popularised the term filicide, the Latin word for the murder of one's own child, to refer to disability-related murders.^[17][18]

The existence of the Disability Day of Mourning, and the murders that cause it to exist, has been discussed as a sign of how pervasive ableism is. For instance, the necessity of the day was discussed in the reception to Sia's controversial film Music, about an autistic girl, and the scenes of the character being physically restrained against her will – something that has resulted in the deaths of many disabled and autistic people.^[19]

Since the origin of the Disability Day of Mourning, media coverage of disabled people has become more positive, and self-advocacy in such coverage – with disabled writers discussing disabled experience from an inside view – has become more common. The Disability Day of Mourning has been accepted by mainstream disability groups, such as Arc and Easter Seals.^[1] Coverage of autism and disability by major news organizations has grown more aligned to disability rights perspectives; between 2007 and 2016, the Washington Post's coverage of autism became more likely to highlight the strengths of autistic people, more likely to use terms popular amongst self-advocates such as "neurodiversity", and more likely to discuss accommodations for autistic people to live in allistic society.^[20]

See also[]

• Ableism
• Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, the first United States hate crime legislation to include disability as a protected class

References[]