This article has multiple issues. Please help or discuss these issues on the . (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. If notability cannot be shown, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted. Find sources: – ···scholar·JSTOR(September 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: – ···scholar·JSTOR(September 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
(Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Elaborative interrogation is a strategy for enhancing memory during the process of learning. In this method, the learner reads the fact-to-be-remembered and generates an explanation for it. The learner uses questions like Why? and How? to understand the meaning of the information. For example, "Why do leaves of a tree fall during winter?" or "How do the falling of leaves occur during winter?" The elaboration technique that is used here aids in clarifying the relationship that exists between the subject (leaves) and the predicate (fall during winter) in the given information. As a result, the clarifying relationship that was seen is basically drawn from the memory. However, the exact prior knowledge that is required for this is not clear. Some researchers emphasize the importance of knowledge on the subject while others give importance towards knowing the abstract details of the information.[1]
Effectiveness[]
There is an integration of new facts with the prior knowledge of the learner.
This method benefits learners across a relatively wide range of age.
It can be used by students of varying ability levels.
Learners were able to generate an adequate answer which is better than no answer.[2]
Educational implications[]
Students are taught how to generate questions as well as find answers for the given fact/information.
Students learn to share their thoughts, and justify and defend their derivation of the answer.
Students can also form, analyse and clarify their content.[3]