Erdős–Turán conjecture on additive bases

This article's lead section may be too long for the length of the article. Please help by moving some material from it into the body of the article. Please read the layout guide and lead section guidelines to ensure the section will still be inclusive of all essential details. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page. (May 2020)

The Erdős–Turán conjecture is an old unsolved problem in additive number theory (not to be confused with Erdős conjecture on arithmetic progressions) posed by Paul Erdős and Pál Turán in 1941.

The question concerns subsets of the natural numbers, typically denoted by ${\displaystyle \mathbb {N} }$, called additive bases. A subset ${\displaystyle B}$ is called an (asymptotic) additive basis of finite order if there is some positive integer ${\displaystyle h}$ such that every sufficiently large natural number ${\displaystyle n}$ can be written as the sum of at most ${\displaystyle h}$ elements of ${\displaystyle B}$. For example, the natural numbers are themselves an additive basis of order 1, since every natural number is trivially a sum of at most one natural number. Lagrange's four-square theorem says that the set of positive square numbers is an additive basis of order 4. Another highly non-trivial and celebrated result along these lines is Vinogradov's theorem.

One is naturally inclined to ask whether these results are optimal. It turns out that Lagrange's four-square theorem cannot be improved, as there are infinitely many positive integers which are not the sum of three squares. This is because no positive integer which is the sum of three squares can leave a remainder of 7 when divided by 8. However, one should perhaps expect that a set ${\displaystyle B}$ which is about as sparse as the squares (meaning that in a given interval ${\displaystyle [1,N]}$, roughly ${\displaystyle N^{1/2}}$ of the integers in ${\displaystyle [1,N]}$ lie in ${\displaystyle B}$) which does not have this obvious deficit should have the property that every sufficiently large positive integer is the sum of three elements from ${\displaystyle B}$. This follows from the following probabilistic model: suppose that ${\displaystyle N/2<n\leq N}$ is a positive integer, and ${\displaystyle x_{1},x_{2},x_{3}}$ are 'randomly' selected from ${\displaystyle B\cap [1,N]}$. Then the probability of a given element from ${\displaystyle B}$ being chosen is roughly ${\displaystyle 1/N^{1/2}}$. One can then estimate the expected value, which in this case will be quite large. Thus, we 'expect' that there are many representations of ${\displaystyle n}$ as a sum of three elements from ${\displaystyle B}$, unless there is some arithmetic obstruction (which means that ${\displaystyle B}$ is somehow quite different than a 'typical' set of the same density), like with the squares. Therefore, one should expect that the squares are quite inefficient at representing positive integers as the sum of four elements, since there should already be lots of representations as sums of three elements for those positive integers ${\displaystyle n}$ that passed the arithmetic obstruction. Examining Vinogradov's theorem quickly reveals that the primes are also very inefficient at representing positive integers as the sum of four primes, for instance.

This begets the question: suppose that ${\displaystyle B}$, unlike the squares or the prime numbers, is very efficient at representing positive integers as a sum of ${\displaystyle h}$ elements of ${\displaystyle B}$. How efficient can it be? The best possibility is that we can find a positive integer ${\displaystyle h}$ and a set ${\displaystyle B}$ such that every positive integer ${\displaystyle n}$ is the sum of at most ${\displaystyle h}$ elements of ${\displaystyle B}$ in exactly one way. Failing that, perhaps we can find a ${\displaystyle B}$ such that every positive integer ${\displaystyle n}$ is the sum of at most ${\displaystyle h}$ elements of ${\displaystyle B}$ in at least one way and at most ${\displaystyle S(h)}$ ways, where ${\displaystyle S}$ is a function of ${\displaystyle h}$.

This is basically the question that Paul Erdős and Pál Turán asked in 1941. Indeed, they conjectured a negative answer to this question, namely that if ${\displaystyle B}$ is an additive basis of order ${\displaystyle h}$ of the natural numbers, then it cannot represent positive integers as a sum of at most ${\displaystyle h}$ too efficiently; the number of representations of ${\displaystyle n}$, as a function of ${\displaystyle n}$, must tend to infinity.

History[]

The conjecture was made jointly by Paul Erdős and Pál Turán in 1941.^[1] In the original paper, they write

"(2) If ${\displaystyle f(n)>0}$ for ${\displaystyle n>n_{0}}$, then ${\displaystyle \varlimsup _{n\rightarrow \infty }f(n)=\infty }$",

where ${\displaystyle \varlimsup _{n\rightarrow \infty }}$ denotes the limit superior. Here ${\displaystyle f(n)}$ is the number of ways one can write the natural number ${\displaystyle n}$ as the sum of two (not necessarily distinct) elements of ${\displaystyle B}$. If ${\displaystyle f(n)}$ is always positive for sufficiently large ${\displaystyle n}$, then ${\displaystyle B}$ is called an additive basis (of order 2).^[2] This problem has attracted significant attention^[2] but remains unsolved.

In 1964, Erdős published a multiplicative version of this conjecture.^[3]

Progress[]

While the conjecture remains unsolved, there have been some advances on the problem. First, we express the problem in modern language. For a given subset ${\displaystyle B\subset \mathbb {N} }$, we define its representation function ${\displaystyle r_{B}(n)=\#\{(a_{1},a_{2})\in B^{2}\mid a_{1}+a_{2}=n\}}$. Then the conjecture states that if ${\displaystyle r_{B}(n)>0}$ for all ${\displaystyle n}$ sufficiently large, then ${\displaystyle \limsup _{n\rightarrow \infty }r_{B}(n)=\infty }$.

More generally, for any ${\displaystyle h\in \mathbb {N} }$ and subset ${\displaystyle B\subset \mathbb {N} }$, we can define the ${\displaystyle h}$ representation function as ${\displaystyle r_{B,h}(n)=\#\{(a_{1},\cdots ,a_{h})\in B^{h}\mid a_{1}+\cdots +a_{h}=n\}}$. We say that ${\displaystyle B}$ is an additive basis of order ${\displaystyle h}$ if ${\displaystyle r_{B,h}(n)>0}$ for all ${\displaystyle n}$ sufficiently large. One can see from an elementary argument that if ${\displaystyle B}$ is an additive basis of order ${\displaystyle h}$, then

${\displaystyle \displaystyle n\leq \sum _{m=1}^{n}r_{B,h}(m)\leq |B\cap [1,n]|^{h}}$

So we obtain the lower bound ${\displaystyle n^{1/h}\leq |B\cap [1,n]|}$.

The original conjecture spawned as Erdős and Turán sought a partial answer to Sidon's problem (see: Sidon sequence). Later, Erdős set out to answer the following question posed by Sidon: how close to the lower bound ${\displaystyle |B\cap [1,n]|\geq n^{1/h}}$ can an additive basis ${\displaystyle B}$ of order ${\displaystyle h}$ get? This question was answered in the case ${\displaystyle h=2}$ by Erdős in 1956.^[4] Erdős proved that there exists an additive basis ${\displaystyle B}$ of order 2 and constants ${\displaystyle c_{1},c_{2}>0}$ such that ${\displaystyle c_{1}\log n\leq r_{B}(n)\leq c_{2}\log n}$ for all ${\displaystyle n}$ sufficiently large. In particular, this implies that there exists an additive basis ${\displaystyle B}$ such that ${\displaystyle r_{B}(n)=n^{1/2+o(1)}}$, which is essentially best possible. This motivated Erdős to make the following conjecture:

If ${\displaystyle B}$ is an additive basis of order ${\displaystyle h}$, then ${\displaystyle \limsup _{n\rightarrow \infty }r_{B}(n)/\log n>0.}$

In 1986, Eduard Wirsing proved that a large class of additive bases, including the prime numbers, contains a subset that is an additive basis but significantly thinner than the original.^[5] In 1990, Erdős and Prasad V. Tetali extended Erdős's 1956 result to bases of arbitrary order.^[6] In 2000, V. Vu proved that thin subbases exist in the Waring bases using the Hardy–Littlewood circle method and his polynomial concentration results.^[7] In 2006, Borwein, Choi, and Chu proved that for all additive bases ${\displaystyle B}$, ${\displaystyle f(n)}$ eventually exceeds 7.^[8][9]

References[]