Family Π

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Family Π is a group of New Testament manuscripts. Belonging to the Byzantine text-type, it is one of the textual families of this group. The name of the family, "Π" (pronounced in English as "pie"), is drawn from the symbol used for the Codex Petropolitanus. One of the most distinct of the Byzantine sub-groups, it is very old and the third largest. The oldest Byzantine manuscripts belong to this family.

Hermann von Soden designated this group by the symbol "Ka". According to him, its text is not purely Byzantine.

Codices and manuscripts[]

Soden included the following in this group of codices: Cyprius (K), Petropolitanus (Π), 72, 114, 116, 178, 265, 389, 1008, 1009, 1079, 1154, 1200, 1219, 1346, and 1398. Lake added to this group of manuscripts: 489, 537, 652, 775, 796, 904, 1478, 1500, 1546, 1561, 1781, 1816. Soden also associated Codex Alexandrinus with this group. lists about 150 witnesses of the family, but the majority of them belong to this family only in some parts of their text.[1] The Peshitta, in the Gospels, represents this family.

Some manuscripts are related to the family: Minuscule 706. In the Pericope Adultera, Tommy Wasserman found Family Π to include 581, 1272, 1306, 1571, 1627, 1690, 1699, and 2463.[2]

Some manuscripts represent this family in some parts: 2278.

Group profile[]

Codex Petropolitanus, beginning of Luke

According to the Claremont Profile Method group Π has following profile in Luke 1, 10, and 20:[n 1]

  • Luke 1:2 (1 reading) — παρεδοσαν ] παρεδοκαν
  • Luke 1:8 (4) — εναντι ] εναντιον
  • Luke 1:17 (12) — ετοιμασαι ] + τω
  • Luke 1:22 (14) — εδυνατο ] ηδυνατο
  • Luke 1:39 (30) — αναστασα δε ] και αναστασα
  • Luke 1:44 (34) — εν αγαλλιασει το βρεφος ] το βρεφος εν αγαλλιασει
  • Luke 1:61 (41) — εκ της συγγενειας ] εν τη συγγενεια
  • Luke 10:1 (1 reading) — δυο δυο ] δυο
  • Luke 10:2 (8) — οπως ] + αν
  • Luke 10:6 (15) — εαν ] + μεν
  • Luke 10:11 (22) — εις τους ποδας ] omit
  • Luke 10:12 (23) — λεγω ] + δε
  • Luke 10:16 (30) — ακουων υμων ] υμων ακουων
  • Luke 10:17 (32) — οι εβδομηκοντα μετα χαρας ] μετα χαρας οι εβδομηκοντα
  • Luke 10:22 (33) — παντα ] και στραφεις προς τους μαθητας ειπε παντα
  • Luke 10:22 (38) — παρεδοθε ] παρα δεδοται
  • Luke 10:32 (47) — ελθων ] omit
  • Luke 10:32 (48) — ιδων ] + αυτον
  • Luke 10:35 (53) — τι ] + δ'
  • Luke 10:36 (57) — πλησιον δοκει σοι ] δοκει σοι πλησιον
  • Luke 10:41 (63) — ειπεν αυτη ο κυριος (or Ιησους) ] ο κυριος ειπεν αυτη
  • Luke 20:1 (2 reading) — εν τω ιερω ] omit
  • Luke 20:1 (4) — αρχιερεις ] ιερεις
  • Luke 20:3 (8) — υμας καγω ] καγω υμας
  • Luke 20:3 (9) — ενα λογον (=TR) ] λογον ενα
  • Luke 20:9 (19) — τις ] omit
  • Luke 20:10 (23) — εξαπεστειλαν ] απεστειλαν
  • Luke 20:12 (24) — και τουτον ] κακεινον
  • Luke 20:14 (26) — διελογιζοντο ] διελογισαντο
  • Luke 20:14 (28) — κληρονομος ] + δευτε
  • Luke 20:19 (33) — υστερον ] + παντων
  • Luke 20:19 (34) — τας χειρας ] την χειρα
  • Luke 20:28 (50) — Μωυσης ] Μωσης
  • Luke 20:34 (61) — γαμισκονται ] εκγαμιζονται (ΤR reads: εκγαμισκονται)
  • Luke 20:35 (62) — γαμιζονται ] εκγαμιζονται (ΤR reads: εκγαμισκονται)
  • Luke 20:36 (64) — εισι(ν) ] omit
  • Luke 20:37 (65) — Μωυσης ] Μωσης
  • Luke 20:41 (70) — λεγουσι(ν) ] + τινες
  • Luke 20:44 (74) — κυριον αυτον ] αυτον κυριον
  • Luke 20:44 (75) — αυτου υιος ] υιος αυτου.[3]

See also[]

Νοtes[]

  1. ^ The word before the bracket is the reading of the UBS edition; the readings which are not bold are those of the Textus Receptus. See F. Wisse, The profile method for the classification and evaluation of manuscript evidence, p. 95

References[]

  1. ^ Frederik Wisse, The Profile Method for the Classification and Evaluation of Manuscript Evidence, William B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1982, pp. 103-105. ISBN 0-8028-1918-4, ISBN 978-0-8028-1918-5
  2. ^ Tommy Wasserman, The Patmos Family of New Testament MSS and Its Allies in the Pericope of the Adulteress and Beyond Archived 2011-07-07 at the Wayback Machine
  3. ^ Frederik Wisse, The Profile Method for the Classification and Evaluation of Manuscript Evidence, William B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1982, p. 103, 122-125.

Further reading[]

Retrieved from ""