Global warming potential

Global warming potential (GWP) is the heat absorbed by any greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, as a multiple of the heat that would be absorbed by the same mass of carbon dioxide (CO₂). GWP is 1 for CO₂. For other gases it depends on the gas and the time frame.

Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e or CO₂eq or CO₂-e) is calculated from GWP. For any gas, it is the mass of CO₂ which would warm the earth as much as the mass of that gas. Thus it provides a common scale for measuring the climate effects of different gases. It is calculated as GWP times mass of the other gas. For example, if a gas has GWP of 100, two tonnes of the gas have CO₂e of 200 tonnes.

Values[]

Carbon dioxide is the reference. It has a GWP of 1 regardless of the time period used. CO₂ emissions cause increases in atmospheric concentrations of CO₂ that will last thousands of years.^[1] Estimates of GWP values over 20, 100 and 500 years are periodically compiled and revised in reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change:

• SAR (1995)^[2]
• TAR (2001)^[3]
• AR4 (2007)^[4]
• AR5 (2013)^[5]
• AR6 (2021)

Though recent reports reflect more scientific accuracy, countries and companies continue to use SAR and AR4 values for reasons of comparison in their emission reports. AR5 has skipped 500 year values but introduced GWP estimations including the climate-carbon feedback (f) with a large amount of uncertainty.^[5]

GWP values and lifetimes	Lifetime (years)	Global warming potential, GWP
		20 years	100 years	500 years
Methane (CH4)	12.4[5]	56[2] 72[4] 84 / 86f[5] 96 [6]	21[2] 25[4] 28 / 34f[5] 32[7] 39f (biogenic)[8] 40f (fossil) [8]	6.5[2] 7.6[4]
Nitrous oxide (N2O)	121.0[5]	280[2] 289[4] 264 / 268f[5]	310[2] 298[4] 265 / 298f[5]	170[2] 153[4]
HFC-134a (hydrofluorocarbon)	13.4[5]	3710 / 3790f[5]	1300 / 1550f[5]	435[4]
CFC-11 (chlorofluorocarbon)	45.0[5]	6900 / 7020f[5]	4660 / 5350f[5]	1620[4]
Carbon tetrafluoride (CF4 / PFC-14)	50,000[5]	4880 / 4950f[5]	6630 / 7350f[5]	11,200[4]
HFC-23 (hydrofluorocarbon)	222[5]	12,000[4] 10,800[5]	14,800[4] 12,400[5]	12,200[4]
Sulfur hexafluoride SF6	3,200[5]	16,300[4] 17,500[5]	22,800[4] 23,500[5]	32,600[4]
Hydrogen (H2)	4–7[9]	N/A	4.3[9]	N/A

The IPCC lists many other substances not shown here.^[5] Some have high GWP but only a low concentration in the atmosphere. The total impact of all fluorinated gases is estimated at 3% of all greenhouse gas emissions.^[10]

The values given in the table assume the same mass of compound is analyzed; different ratios will result from the conversion of one substance to another. For instance, burning methane to carbon dioxide would reduce the global warming impact, but by a smaller factor than 25:1 because the mass of methane burned is less than the mass of carbon dioxide released (ratio 1:2.74).^[11] If you started with 1 tonne of methane which has a GWP of 25, after combustion you would have 2.74 tonnes of CO₂, each tonne of which has a GWP of 1. This is a net reduction of 22.26 tonnes of GWP, reducing the global warming effect by a ratio of 25:2.74 (approximately 9 times).

Use in Kyoto Protocol and UNFCCC[]

Under the Kyoto Protocol, in 1997 the Conference of the Parties standardized international reporting, by deciding (decision 2/CP.3) that the values of GWP calculated for the IPCC Second Assessment Report were to be used for converting the various greenhouse gas emissions into comparable CO₂ equivalents.^[12][13]

After some intermediate updates, in 2013 this standard was updated by the Warsaw meeting of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC, decision 24/CP.19) to require using a new set of 100-year GWP values. They published these values in Annex III, and they took them from the 4th Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which had been published in 2007.^[14]

Those 2007 estimates are still used for international comparisons through 2020,^[15] although the latest research on warming effects has found other values, as shown in the table above.

Greenhouse gas	Chemical formula	100-year Global warming potentials (2007 estimates, for 2013-2020 comparisons)
Carbon dioxide	CO2	1 0
Methane	CH4	25 0
Nitrous oxide	N2O	298 0
Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)
HFC-23	CHF3	14800 0
Difluoromethane (HFC-32)	CH2F2	675 0
Fluoromethane (HFC-41)	CH3F	92 0
HFC-43-10mee	CF3CHFCHFCF2CF3	1640 0
Pentafluoroethane (HFC-125)	C2HF5	3500 0
HFC-134	C2H2F4 (CHF2CHF2)	1100 0
1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a)	C2H2F4 (CH2FCF3)	1430 0
HFC-143	C2H3F3 (CHF2CH2F)	353 0
1,1,1-Trifluoroethane (HFC-143a)	C2H3F3 (CF3CH3)	4470 0
HFC-152	CH2FCH2F	53 0
HFC-152a	C2H4F2 (CH3CHF2)	124 0
HFC-161	CH3CH2F	12 0
1,1,1,2,3,3,3-Heptafluoropropane (HFC-227ea)	C3HF7	3220 0
HFC-236cb	CH2FCF2CF3	1340 0
HFC-236ea	CHF2CHFCF3	1370 0
HFC-236fa	C3H2F6	9810 0
HFC-245ca	C3H3F5	693 0
HFC-245fa	CHF2CH2CF3	1030 0
HFC-365mfc	CH3CF2CH2CF3	794 0
Perfluorocarbons
Carbon tetrafluoride – PFC-14	CF4	7390 0
Hexafluoroethane – PFC-116	C2F6	12200 0
Octafluoropropane – PFC-218	C3F8	8830 0
Perfluorobutane – PFC-3-1-10	C4F10	8860 0
Octafluorocyclobutane – PFC-318	c-C4F8	10300 0
Perfluouropentane – PFC-4-1-12	C5F12	9160 0
Perfluorohexane – PFC-5-1-14	C6F14	9300 0
Perfluorodecalin – PFC-9-1-18b	C10F18	7500 0
Perfluorocyclopropane	c-C3F6	17340 0
Sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)
Sulphur hexafluoride	SF6	22800 0
Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3)
Nitrogen trifluoride	NF3	17200 0
Fluorinated ethers
HFE-125	CHF2OCF3	14900 0
(HFE-134)	CHF2OCHF2	6320 0
HFE-143a	CH3OCF3	756 0
HCFE-235da2	CHF2OCHClCF3	350 0
HFE-245cb2	CH3OCF2CF3	708 0
HFE-245fa2	CHF2OCH2CF3	659 0
HFE-254cb2	CH3OCF2CHF2	359 0
HFE-347mcc3	CH3OCF2CF2CF3	575 0
HFE-347pcf2	CHF2CF2OCH2CF3	580 0
HFE-356pcc3	CH3OCF2CF2CHF2	110 0
HFE-449sl (HFE-7100)	C4F9OCH3	297 0
HFE-569sf2 (HFE-7200)	C4F9OC2H5	59 0
HFE-43-10pccc124 (H-Galden 1040x)	CHF2OCF2OC2F4OCHF2	1870 0
HFE-236ca12 (HG-10)	CHF2OCF2OCHF2	2800 0
HFE-338pcc13 (HG-01)	CHF2OCF2CF2OCHF2	1500 0
	(CF3)2CFOCH3	343 0
	CF3CF2CH2OH	42 0
	(CF3)2CHOH	195 0
HFE-227ea	CF3CHFOCF3	1540 0
HFE-236ea2	CHF2OCHFCF3	989 0
HFE-236fa	CF3CH2OCF3	487 0
HFE-245fa1	CHF2CH2OCF3	286 0
HFE-263fb2	CF3CH2OCH3	11 0
HFE-329mcc2	CHF2CF2OCF2CF3	919 0
HFE-338mcf2	CF3CH2OCF2CF3	552 0
HFE-347mcf2	CHF2CH2OCF2CF3	374 0
HFE-356mec3	CH3OCF2CHFCF3	101 0
HFE-356pcf2	CHF2CH2OCF2CHF2	265 0
HFE-356pcf3	CHF2OCH2CF2CHF2	502 0
HFE-365mcfI’ll t3	CF3CF2CH2OCH3	11 0
HFE-374pc2	CHF2CF2OCH2CH3	557 0
	– (CF2)4CH (OH) –	73 0
	(CF3)2CHOCHF2	380 0
	(CF3)2CHOCH3	27 0
Perfluoropolyethers
PFPMIE	CF3OCF(CF3)CF2OCF2OCF3	10300 0
Trifluoromethyl sulphur pentafluoride (SF5CF3)
Trifluoromethyl sulphur pentafluoride	SF5CF3	17 0

Importance of time horizon[]

A substance's GWP depends on the number of years (denoted by a subscript) over which the potential is calculated. A gas which is quickly removed from the atmosphere may initially have a large effect, but for longer time periods, as it has been removed, it becomes less important. Thus methane has a potential of 25 over 100 years (GWP₁₀₀ = 25) but 86 over 20 years (GWP₂₀ = 86); conversely sulfur hexafluoride has a GWP of 22,800 over 100 years but 16,300 over 20 years (IPCC Third Assessment Report). The GWP value depends on how the gas concentration decays over time in the atmosphere. This is often not precisely known and hence the values should not be considered exact. For this reason when quoting a GWP it is important to give a reference to the calculation.

The GWP for a mixture of gases can be obtained from the mass-fraction-weighted average of the GWPs of the individual gases.^[16]

Commonly, a time horizon of 100 years is used by regulators.

Water vapour[]

Water vapour does contribute to anthropogenic global warming, but as the GWP is defined, it is negligible for H₂O.

H₂O is the strongest greenhouse gas, because it has a profound infrared absorption spectrum with more and broader absorption bands than CO₂. Its concentration in the atmosphere is limited by air temperature, so that radiative forcing by water vapour increases with global warming (positive feedback). But the GWP definition excludes indirect effects. GWP definition is also based on emissions, and anthropogenic emissions of water vapour (cooling towers, irrigation) are removed via precipitation within weeks, so its GWP is negligible.

Criticism and other metrics[]

The Global Temperature change Potential (GTP) is another way to compare gases. While GWP estimates heat absorbed, GTP estimates the resulting rise in average surface temperature of the world, over the next 20, 50 or 100 years, caused by a greenhouse gas, relative to the temperature rise which the same mass of CO₂ would cause.^[5] Calculation of GTP requires modeling how the world, especially the oceans, will absorb heat.^[17] GTP is published in the same IPCC tables with GWP.^[5]

GWP* has been proposed to take better account of short-lived climate pollutants (SLCP) such as methane, relating a change in the rate of emissions of SLCPs to a fixed quantity of CO₂.^[18]

Calculating the global warming potential[]

The GWP depends on the following factors:

• the absorption of infrared radiation by a given gas
• the time horizon of interest (integration period)
• the atmospheric lifetime of the gas

A high GWP correlates with a large infrared absorption and a long atmospheric lifetime. The dependence of GWP on the wavelength of absorption is more complicated. Even if a gas absorbs radiation efficiently at a certain wavelength, this may not affect its GWP much if the atmosphere already absorbs most radiation at that wavelength. A gas has the most effect if it absorbs in a "window" of wavelengths where the atmosphere is fairly transparent. The dependence of GWP as a function of wavelength has been found empirically and published as a graph.^[19]

Because the GWP of a greenhouse gas depends directly on its infrared spectrum, the use of infrared spectroscopy to study greenhouse gases is centrally important in the effort to understand the impact of human activities on global climate change.

Just as radiative forcing provides a simplified means of comparing the various factors that are believed to influence the climate system to one another, global warming potentials (GWPs) are one type of simplified index based upon radiative properties that can be used to estimate the potential future impacts of emissions of different gases upon the climate system in a relative sense. GWP is based on a number of factors, including the radiative efficiency (infrared-absorbing ability) of each gas relative to that of carbon dioxide, as well as the decay rate of each gas (the amount removed from the atmosphere over a given number of years) relative to that of carbon dioxide.^[20]

The radiative forcing capacity (RF) is the amount of energy per unit area, per unit time, absorbed by the greenhouse gas, that would otherwise be lost to space. It can be expressed by the formula:

${\displaystyle {\mathit {RF}}=\sum _{i=1}^{100}{\text{abs}}_{i}\cdot F_{i}/\left({\text{l}}\cdot {\text{d}}\right)}$

where the subscript i represents an interval of 10 inverse centimeters. Abs_i represents the integrated infrared absorbance of the sample in that interval, and F_i represents the RF for that interval.^{[verification needed]}

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) provides the generally accepted values for GWP, which changed slightly between 1996 and 2001. An exact definition of how GWP is calculated is to be found in the IPCC's 2001 Third Assessment Report.^[21] The GWP is defined as the ratio of the time-integrated radiative forcing from the instantaneous release of 1 kg of a trace substance relative to that of 1 kg of a reference gas:

${\displaystyle {\mathit {GWP}}\left(x\right)={\frac {a_{x}}{a_{r}}}{\frac {\int _{0}^{\mathit {TH}}[x](t)\,dt}{\int _{0}^{\mathit {TH}}[r](t)\,dt}}}$

where TH is the time horizon over which the calculation is considered; a_x is the radiative efficiency due to a unit increase in atmospheric abundance of the substance (i.e., Wm⁻² kg⁻¹) and [x](t) is the time-dependent decay in abundance of the substance following an instantaneous release of it at time t=0. The denominator contains the corresponding quantities for the reference gas (i.e. CO₂). The radiative efficiencies a_x and a_r are not necessarily constant over time. While the absorption of infrared radiation by many greenhouse gases varies linearly with their abundance, a few important ones display non-linear behaviour for current and likely future abundances (e.g., CO₂, CH₄, and N₂O). For those gases, the relative radiative forcing will depend upon abundance and hence upon the future scenario adopted.

Since all GWP calculations are a comparison to CO₂ which is non-linear, all GWP values are affected. Assuming otherwise as is done above will lead to lower GWPs for other gases than a more detailed approach would. Clarifying this, while increasing CO₂ has less and less effect on radiative absorption as ppm concentrations rise, more powerful greenhouse gases like methane and nitrous oxide have different thermal absorption frequencies to CO₂ that are not filled up (saturated) as much as CO₂, so rising ppms of these gases are far more significant.

Carbon dioxide equivalent[]

Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e or CO₂eq or CO₂-e) of a quantity of gas is calculated from its GWP. For any gas, it is the mass of CO₂ which would warm the earth as much as the mass of that gas^[22]. Thus it provides a common scale for measuring the climate effects of different gases. It is calculated as GWP multiplied by mass of the other gas. For example, if a gas has GWP of 100, two tonnes of the gas have CO₂e of 200 tonnes, and 9 tonnes of the gas has CO₂e of 900 tonnes.

On a global scale, the warming effects of one or more greenhouse gases in the atmosphere can also be expressed as an equivalent atmospheric concentration of CO₂. CO₂e can then be the atmospheric concentration of CO₂ which would warm the earth as much as a particular concentration of some other gas or of all gases and aerosols in the atmosphere. For example, CO₂e of 500 parts per million would reflect a mix of atmospheric gases which warm the earth as much as 500 parts per million of CO₂ would warm it.^[23][24] Calculation of the equivalent atmospheric concentration of CO₂ of an atmospheric greenhouse gas or aerosol is more complex and involves the atmospheric concentrations of those gases, their GWPs, and the ratios of their molar masses to the molar mass of CO₂.

CO₂e calculations depend on the time-scale chosen, typically 100 years or 20 years,^[25][26] since gases decay in the atmosphere or are absorbed naturally, at different rates.

The following units are commonly used:

• By the UN climate change panel (IPCC): billion metric tonnes = n×10⁹ tonnes of CO₂ equivalent (GtCO₂eq)^[27]
• In industry: million metric tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents (MMTCDE)^[28] and MMT CO₂eq.^[15]
• For vehicles: grams of carbon dioxide equivalent per mile (gCO₂e/mile) or per kilometer (gCO₂e/km)^[29][30]

For example, the table above shows GWP for methane over 20 years at 86 and nitrous oxide at 289, so emissions of 1 million tonnes of methane or nitrous oxide are equivalent to emissions of 86 or 289 million tonnes of carbon dioxide, respectively.

See also[]

• Carbon accounting
• Carbon footprint
• Vehicle emission standard
• List of refrigerants
• Emission intensity
• Radiative forcing
• Total equivalent warming impact

References[]

Notes[]

Sources[]

IPCC reports[]

• Schimel, D.; Alves, D.; Enting, I.; Heimann, M.; et al. (1995). "Chapter 2: Radiative Forcing of Climate Change". Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. pp. 65–132.
• Ramaswamy, V.; Boucher, O.; Haigh, J.; Hauglustaine, D.; et al. (2001). "Chapter 6: Radiative Forcing of Climate Change". Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. pp. 349–416.
• Forster, P.; Ramaswamy, V.; Artaxo, P.; Berntsen, T.; et al. (2007). "Chapter 2: Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and Radiative Forcing" (PDF). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. pp. 129–234.
• Myhre, G.; Shindell, D.; Bréon, F.-M.; Collins, W.; et al. (2013). "Chapter 8: Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing" (PDF). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. pp. 659–740.

Other sources[]

• Alvarez (2018). "Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain". Science. 361 (6398): 186–188. Bibcode:2018Sci...361..186A. doi:10.1126/science.aar7204. PMC 6223263. PMID 29930092.
• Etminan, M.; Myhre, G.; Highwood, E. J.; Shine, K. P. (2016-12-28). "Radiative forcing of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide: A significant revision of the methane radiative forcing: Greenhouse Gas Radiative Forcing". Geophysical Research Letters. 43 (24): 12, 614–12, 623. doi:10.1002/2016GL071930.
• Derwent, R.G. (2018-10-07). "Hydrogen for Heating: Atmospheric Impacts. A literature review" (PDF). BEIS Research Paper (2018:21).
• Morton, Adam (2020-08-26). "Methane released in gas production means Australia's emissions may be 10% higher than reported". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2020-08-26.
• Olivier, J.G.J.; Peters, J.A.H.W. (2020). Trends in global CO₂ and total greenhouse gas emissions (2020) (PDF) (Report). The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.

External links[]

• List of Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes from the U.S. EPA
• GWP and the different meanings of CO₂e explained

Bibliography[]

• Gohar, L. K.; Shine, K. P. (November 2007). "Equivalent CO₂ and its use in understanding the climate effects of increased greenhouse gas concentrations". Weather. Royal Meteorological Society. 62 (11): 307–311. Bibcode:2007Wthr...62..307G. doi:10.1002/wea.103. ISSN 1477-8696.