Illicit Drug Anti-Proliferation Act

Illicit Drug Anti-Proliferation Act of 2003
Long title	A bill to prohibit an individual from knowingly opening, maintaining, managing, controlling, renting, leasing, making available for use, or profiting from any place for the purpose of manufacturing, distributing, or using any controlled substance, and for other purposes.
Enacted by	the 108th United States Congress
Effective	April 30, 2003
Codification
Acts amended	Controlled Substances Act
Legislative history
	Introduced in the Senate as S. 226 by Joe Biden (D-DE) on January 28, 2003; Committee consideration by Judiciary; Signed into law by President George W. Bush on April 30, 2003;

The Illicit Drug Anti-Proliferation Act of 2003 is a United States federal law enacted as a rider within the PROTECT Act on April 30, 2003. A substantially similar Act was proposed during the previous Congress as the Reducing Americans' Vulnerability to Ecstasy Act (RAVE Act).^[1]

Provisions[]

The Act modified section 416(a) of the Controlled Substances Act (also known as the "crackhouse law" and codified at United States Code, 21 U.S.C. § 856(a)) to expand the section regarding "Establishment of manufacturing operations", which previously outlawed maintaining, managing or owning any place used to manufacture, distribute or use drugs to include temporary or permanent uses of the premises.

The Act also created a civil penalty of $250,000 or "2 times the gross receipts, either known or estimated, that were derived from each violation that is attributable to the person", whichever was greater. Additionally, the Act recommended that the United States Sentencing Commission reconsider the then-current Federal sentencing guidelines with respect to offenses involving Gamma-Hydroxybutyric acid, commonly known as a date rape drug.

Legislative history[]

The bill, originally titled the Reducing Americans' Vulnerability to Ecstasy Act (RAVE ACT,) was sponsored by Senator Joe Biden, along with cosponsors Chuck Grassley, Orrin Hatch, Joe Lieberman, Strom Thurmond, Patrick Leahy and Dick Durbin.^[2] The bill was referred to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary on June 18, 2002. On June 27, 2002, it was reported out of the committee without written comment or amendment and placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar. On October 10, 2002, Senator Biden provided introductory remarks on the bill before the Senate.

The RAVE Act was also included as an amendment to the Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003, introduced on January 7, 2003, by Thomas Daschle (D-SD.) This bill also failed to pass.

It was reintroduced in the 118th Congress by Biden, under the name "Illicit Drug Anti-Proliferation Act." It was later attached to the PROTECT Act, which was aimed at prosecuting child sexual abuse, while it was in conference committee; the PROTECT Act was signed into law by President Bush on April 30, 2003

Criticism[]

The act has been criticized for disincentivizing venues from implementing harm reduction measures for fear of prosecution.^[3]

The American Civil Liberties Union has criticized the legislation, arguing that the threat of Drug Enforcement Administration enforcement action leads to a chilling effect on speech and "unfairly punishes businesses for the crimes of their customers."^[4]

References[]

^ "H.R. 718 - Reducing Americans' Vulnerability to Ecstasy Act of 2003". Congress.gov. February 12, 2003.
^ Patrick Leahy and Richard Durbin withdrew their sponsorship of the bill in September 2002.
^ Sullum, Jacob (30 December 2014). "Ignoring Drug Use At Musical Events Only Makes It More Dangerous". Forbes. Retrieved 22 February 2015.
^ "DEA Must Not Be Allowed to Chill Speech or Shut Down Electronic Music Events". American Civil Liberties Union. n.d. Archived from the original on 6 January 2021. Retrieved 12 March 2020.

External links[]

This United States federal legislation article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by .

[1] "H.R. 718 - Reducing Americans' Vulnerability to Ecstasy Act of 2003". Congress.gov. February 12, 2003.

[2] Patrick Leahy and Richard Durbin withdrew their sponsorship of the bill in September 2002.

[3] Sullum, Jacob (30 December 2014). "Ignoring Drug Use At Musical Events Only Makes It More Dangerous". Forbes. Retrieved 22 February 2015.

[4] "DEA Must Not Be Allowed to Chill Speech or Shut Down Electronic Music Events". American Civil Liberties Union. n.d. Archived from the original on 6 January 2021. Retrieved 12 March 2020.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]