Intertemporal CAPM

This article has multiple issues. Please help or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Please help by providing more context for the reader. (October 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources:  –  ·  ·  · scholar · JSTOR (August 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

The Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model, or ICAPM, is an alternative to the CAPM provided by Robert Merton. It is a linear factor model with wealth as state variable that forecast changes in the distribution of future returns or income.

In the ICAPM investors are solving lifetime consumption decisions when faced with more than one uncertainty. The main difference between ICAPM and standard CAPM is the additional state variables that acknowledge the fact that investors hedge against shortfalls in consumption or against changes in the future investment opportunity set.

Continuous time version[]

Merton^[1] considers a continuous time market in equilibrium. The state variable (X) follows a brownian motion:

${\displaystyle dX=\mu dt+sdZ}$

The investor maximizes his Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility:

${\displaystyle E_{o}\left\{\int _{o}^{T}U[C(t),t]dt+B[W(T),T]\right\}}$

where T is the time horizon and B[W(T),T] the utility from wealth (W).

The investor has the following constraint on wealth (W). Let ${\displaystyle w_{i}}$ be the weight invested in the asset i. Then:

${\displaystyle W(t+dt)=[W(t)-C(t)dt]\sum _{i=0}^{n}w_{i}[1+r_{i}(t+dt)]}$

where ${\displaystyle r_{i}}$ is the return on asset i. The change in wealth is:

${\displaystyle dW=-C(t)dt+[W(t)-C(t)dt]\sum w_{i}(t)r_{i}(t+dt)}$

We can use dynamic programming to solve the problem. For instance, if we consider a series of discrete time problems:

${\displaystyle \max E_{0}\left\{\sum _{t=0}^{T-dt}\int _{t}^{t+dt}U[C(s),s]ds+B[W(T),T]\right\}}$

Then, a Taylor expansion gives:

${\displaystyle \int _{t}^{t+dt}U[C(s),s]ds=U[C(t),t]dt+{\frac {1}{2}}U_{t}[C(t^{*}),t^{*}]dt^{2}\approx U[C(t),t]dt}$

where ${\displaystyle t^{*}}$ is a value between t and t+dt.

Assuming that returns follow a brownian motion:

${\displaystyle r_{i}(t+dt)=\alpha _{i}dt+\sigma _{i}dz_{i}}$

with:

${\displaystyle E(r_{i})=\alpha _{i}dt\quad ;\quad E(r_{i}^{2})=var(r_{i})=\sigma _{i}^{2}dt\quad ;\quad cov(r_{i},r_{j})=\sigma _{ij}dt}$

Then canceling out terms of second and higher order:

${\displaystyle dW\approx [W(t)\sum w_{i}\alpha _{i}-C(t)]dt+W(t)\sum w_{i}\sigma _{i}dz_{i}}$

Using Bellman equation, we can restate the problem:

${\displaystyle J(W,X,t)=max\;E_{t}\left\{\int _{t}^{t+dt}U[C(s),s]ds+J[W(t+dt),X(t+dt),t+dt]\right\}}$

subject to the wealth constraint previously stated.

Using Ito's lemma we can rewrite:

${\displaystyle dJ=J[W(t+dt),X(t+dt),t+dt]-J[W(t),X(t),t+dt]=J_{t}dt+J_{W}dW+J_{X}dX+{\frac {1}{2}}J_{XX}dX^{2}+{\frac {1}{2}}J_{WW}dW^{2}+J_{WX}dXdW}$

and the expected value:

${\displaystyle E_{t}J[W(t+dt),X(t+dt),t+dt]=J[W(t),X(t),t]+J_{t}dt+J_{W}E[dW]+J_{X}E(dX)+{\frac {1}{2}}J_{XX}var(dX)+{\frac {1}{2}}J_{WW}var[dW]+J_{WX}cov(dX,dW)}$

After some algebra^[2] , we have the following objective function:

${\displaystyle max\left\{U(C,t)+J_{t}+J_{W}W[\sum _{i=1}^{n}w_{i}(\alpha _{i}-r_{f})+r_{f}]-J_{W}C+{\frac {W^{2}}{2}}J_{WW}\sum _{i=1}^{n}\sum _{j=1}^{n}w_{i}w_{j}\sigma _{ij}+J_{X}\mu +{\frac {1}{2}}J_{XX}s^{2}+J_{WX}W\sum _{i=1}^{n}w_{i}\sigma _{iX}\right\}}$

where ${\displaystyle r_{f}}$ is the risk-free return. First order conditions are:

${\displaystyle J_{W}(\alpha _{i}-r_{f})+J_{WW}W\sum _{j=1}^{n}w_{j}^{*}\sigma _{ij}+J_{WX}\sigma _{iX}=0\quad i=1,2,\ldots ,n}$

In matrix form, we have:

${\displaystyle (\alpha -r_{f}{\mathbf {1} })={\frac {-J_{WW}}{J_{W}}}\Omega w^{*}W+{\frac {-J_{WX}}{J_{W}}}cov_{rX}}$

where ${\displaystyle \alpha }$ is the vector of expected returns, ${\displaystyle \Omega }$ the covariance matrix of returns, ${\displaystyle {\mathbf {1} }}$ a unity vector ${\displaystyle cov_{rX}}$ the covariance between returns and the state variable. The optimal weights are:

${\displaystyle {\mathbf {w} ^{*}}={\frac {-J_{W}}{J_{WW}W}}\Omega ^{-1}(\alpha -r_{f}{\mathbf {1} })-{\frac {J_{WX}}{J_{WW}W}}\Omega ^{-1}cov_{rX}}$

Notice that the intertemporal model provides the same weights of the CAPM. Expected returns can be expressed as follows:

${\displaystyle \alpha _{i}=r_{f}+\beta _{im}(\alpha _{m}-r_{f})+\beta _{ih}(\alpha _{h}-r_{f})}$

where m is the market portfolio and h a portfolio to hedge the state variable.

See also[]

• Intertemporal portfolio choice

References[]

• Merton, R.C., (1973), An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model. Econometrica 41, Vol. 41, No. 5. (Sep., 1973), pp. 867–887
• "Multifactor Portfolio Efficiency and Multifactor Asset Pricing" by Eugene F. Fama, (The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis), Vol. 31, No. 4, Dec., 1996