Judy Fudge

Judy Fudge is a scholar of labour law and the LIUNA Enrico Henry Mancinelli Professor in Global Labour Issues at McMaster University.^[1] Before coming to McMaster, Fudge was a professor of law at the University of Kent and the Landsdowne Chair in Law at the University of Victoria Faculty of Law.^[2] In 2019, she received the Bora Laskin Award from the University of Toronto in recognition of her work on labour law.^[3]

Publications[]

Fudge, Judy; Tucker, Eric (2004). Labour before the Law: The Regulation of Workers' Collective Action in Canada, 1900–1948. University of Toronto Press. ISBN 978-1-4426-5727-4. OCLC 903968592.^[4]
Fudge, Judy; Owens, Rosemary J. (2006). Precarious Work, Women, and the New Economy: The Challenge to Legal Norms. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4725-6365-1. OCLC 648018074.^[5]

^ "Fudge Judy, Professor". McMaster Faculty of Social Sciences. Retrieved October 13, 2020.
^ "Judy Fudge". . Retrieved October 13, 2020.
^ Savage, Larry (November 23, 2019). "Dr. Judy Fudge, 2019 recipient of the Bora Laskin Award". Canadian Association for Work & Labour Studies. Retrieved October 13, 2020.
^
Reviews of Labour before the Law:
- Craven, Paul (2002). "Review of Labour before the Law". The Canadian Historical Review. 83 (1): 135–136. ISSN 1710-1093.
- High, Steven (2001). Urban History Review. 30 (1): 68. doi:10.7202/1015944ar. ISSN 0703-0428.CS1 maint: untitled periodical (link)
- McCallum, Todd (2004). Labour/Le Travail. 53: 257–259. doi:10.2307/25149453. JSTOR 25149453.CS1 maint: untitled periodical (link)
- Laperrière, René (August 2001). Canadian Journal of Law and Society (in French). 16 (2): 215–221. doi:10.1017/S0829320100006876. ISSN 0829-3201.CS1 maint: untitled periodical (link)
^
Reviews of Precarious Work, Women, and the New Economy:
- Bernier, Jean (2007). Relations Industrielles (in French). 62 (4): 779. doi:10.7202/016963ar. ISSN 0034-379X.CS1 maint: untitled periodical (link)
- McCann, Deirdre (2006). "Review of Precarious Work, Women, and the New Economy". International Labour Review. 145 (3): 241–245. ProQuest 223994590.