Liberal hawk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The term liberal hawk refers to a politically liberal person (generally, in the American sense of the term) who supports a hawkish, interventionist foreign policy.

Overview[]

Past U.S. presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson have been described as liberal hawks for their roles in bringing about the US's status as the world's premier military power. The Clinton Doctrine can also be considered as consistent with this vision. Today the term is most frequently used to describe liberals and leftists who supported or still support the decision to invade Iraq in 2003, which was authorized by the United States Congress and ordered by president George W. Bush. The war has stirred heated controversy among all political sides of the debate. The American left was divided over the issue of whether going to war in Iraq was the right decision, as some liberals felt that they should support the war, in accordance with the philosophy of liberal internationalism, which had caused them to support military intervention in the past.[1]

One document often cited as promoting a liberal hawkish point of view is Progressive Internationalism: A Democratic National Security Strategy, published by the Progressive Policy Institute in October 2003.[2] Another document related to this philosophy is a letter to President Bush sent by Social Democrats USA in February 2003, urging the military overthrow of Saddam Hussein's regime.[3]

In January 2004, Paul Berman, Thomas Friedman, Christopher Hitchens, George Packer, Kenneth Pollack, Jacob Weisberg, Fareed Zakaria and Fred Kaplan participated in a five-day online forum entitled Liberal Hawks Reconsider the Iraq War, in which they discussed whether they had been correct in advocating military action against Saddam Hussein's regime. Kaplan by that point had renounced his prior support, but the general consensus among the participants was that, despite the absence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, the war had still been justified on humanitarian grounds.

In his book The Good Fight, published in 2006, Peter Beinart renounced his prior support for the Iraq War, saying, "I was too quick to give up on containment, too quick to think time was on Saddam's side."

Notable people associated[]

Harry S. Truman signing a proclamation declaring a national emergency that initiates U.S. involvement in the Korean War

The list includes people who have been described as liberal hawks.

Politicians[]

Government officials[]

  • Madeleine Albright – former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, former U.S. Secretary of State[28]
  • Zbigniew Brzezinski (deceased) – former National Security Advisor, political scientist[29][30][31][32]
  • Kenneth Pollack – former Clinton administration advisor and senior fellow at The Brookings Institution[2]

Other[]

See also[]

References[]

  1. ^ "The Liberal Quandary Over Iraq". The New York Times Magazine. December 8, 2002.
  2. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f "Liberal Hawk Down". The Nation. October 7, 2004.
  3. ^ Letter to President Bush sent by Social Democrats USA Archived May 9, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
  4. ^ "Berman – A Hawk 20 Years in the Making". Los Angeles Times. March 7, 2003.
  5. ^ "Liberal Hawks, an Endangered Species". The Weekly Standard. May 28, 2007.
  6. ^ "Is Tony Blair a war criminal?". The Telegraph. December 4, 2009.
  7. ^ "The Nation; Blair, the Hawk, Finds Himself With Some Unlikely Friends". The New York Times. February 23, 2003.
  8. ^ "Ben Cardin Is a Hawk. Will Maryland Voters Punish Him for It?". The Nation. May 10, 2018.
  9. ^ "How Hillary Clinton Became a Hawk". The New York Times. 24 April 2016.
  10. ^ "Hillary the Hawk: A History". ForeignPolicy.com. July 27, 2016.
  11. ^ "Why is Hillary Clinton still a hawk?". Chicago Tribune. July 1, 2016.
  12. ^ "Yes, Hillary Clinton Is a Hawk". The National Interest. February 6, 2014.
  13. ^ "Hillary the Hawk". The Nation. February 21, 2007.
  14. ^ "Joe Donnelly talks like a Republican in his newest ad". Washington Examiner. October 16, 2018.
  15. ^ "The Loneliest Democrat in Trump Country". Politico Magazine. December 5, 2017.
  16. ^ "Hire Harman for Chair of Intelligence? No, Nancy, No". HuffPost. November 22, 2006.
  17. ^ "Harman's Harm?". The New Republic. April 20, 2009.
  18. ^ "Let the mighty liberal hawks soar". Los Angeles Times. August 14, 2007.
  19. ^ "The Nation: The Democrats' Liberal Hawk on Capitol Hill". Time. March 22, 1971.
  20. ^ "Return of the liberal hawks". Los Angeles Times. May 28, 2006.
  21. ^ "Joe Lieberman, Religion, and Iraq". Smart Politics. February 20, 2007.
  22. ^ "A Hawk for All Seasons". The American Prospect. August 14, 2006.
  23. ^ "Who Would Joe Lieberman Vote for in 2020? Not Who You'd Think". Tablet Magazine. May 3, 2018.
  24. ^ "Palestine papers: Tzipi Livni". The Guardian. Jan 23, 2011.
  25. ^ "The Democrats' Unlikely Hawk". The American Conservative. December 2, 2013.
  26. ^ "Democrat hawk says he's sticking by Iran deal after reclaiming top panel spot". Al-Monitor. February 9, 2018.
  27. ^ "Kyrsten Sinema's anti-war activist past under scrutiny as she runs for Senate". CNN Politics. October 12, 2018.
  28. ^ "The Lady Is a Hawk". Newsweek. December 15, 1996.
  29. ^ "The last hawk: Zbigniew Brzezinski (1928-2017)". Open Democracy. June 1, 2017.
  30. ^ "Once a Hawk, Brzezinski Sees Hope for U.S.-Russia Relations". Politico Magazine. November 27, 2015.
  31. ^ "Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Adviser to Jimmy Carter, Dies at 89". The New York Times. May 26, 2017.
  32. ^ "On Zbigniew Brzezinski: Geopolitical Mastermind, Realist Practitioner". Foreign Policy Journal. June 5, 2017.
  33. ^ Chait, Jonathan (17 March 2010). "The Yoke's On You, Krauthammer". newrepublic.com.
  34. ^ "Hitchens takes a beating". Salon. August 27, 2005.

External links[]

Retrieved from ""