1996 Conference USA football standings
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Overall
|
Team |
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
L |
|
Southern Miss +
|
|
4
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
3
|
|
Houston +
|
|
4
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
5
|
|
Cincinnati
|
|
2
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
– |
5
|
|
Louisville
|
|
2
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
6
|
|
Memphis
|
|
2
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
7
|
|
Tulane
|
|
1
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
– |
9
|
|
|
- + – Conference co-champions
Rankings from AP Poll
|
|
|
|
1999 Conference USA football standings
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Overall
|
Team |
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
L |
|
No. 14 Southern Miss $
|
|
6
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
– |
3
|
|
East Carolina
|
|
4
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
– |
3
|
|
Louisville
|
|
4
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
5
|
|
UAB
|
|
4
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
6
|
|
Memphis
|
|
4
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
6
|
|
Houston
|
|
3
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
4
|
|
Army
|
|
1
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
8
|
|
Tulane
|
|
1
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
8
|
|
Cincinnati
|
|
0
|
– |
6
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
8
|
|
|
Rankings from AP Poll
|
|
2000 Conference USA football standings
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Overall
|
Team |
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
L |
|
Louisville $
|
|
6
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
– |
3
|
|
East Carolina
|
|
5
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
4
|
|
Cincinnati
|
|
5
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
5
|
|
Southern Miss
|
|
4
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
4
|
|
UAB
|
|
3
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
4
|
|
Tulane
|
|
3
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
– |
5
|
|
Memphis
|
|
2
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
7
|
|
Houston
|
|
2
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
8
|
|
Army
|
|
1
|
– |
6
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
– |
10
|
|
|
Rankings from AP Poll
|
|
2001 Conference USA football standings
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Overall
|
Team |
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
L |
|
No. 17 Louisville $
|
|
6
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
– |
2
|
|
Cincinnati
|
|
5
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
5
|
|
UAB
|
|
5
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
– |
5
|
|
East Carolina
|
|
5
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
– |
6
|
|
Southern Miss
|
|
4
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
– |
5
|
|
TCU
|
|
4
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
– |
6
|
|
Memphis
|
|
3
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
6
|
|
Army
|
|
2
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
8
|
|
Tulane
|
|
1
|
– |
6
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
9
|
|
Houston
|
|
0
|
– |
7
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
11
|
|
|
Rankings from AP Poll
|
|
2002 Conference USA football standings
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Overall
|
Team |
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
L |
|
Cincinnati +
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
7
|
|
No. 23 TCU +
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
– |
2
|
|
Louisville
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
6
|
|
Southern Miss
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
6
|
|
Tulane
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
5
|
|
UAB
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
East Carolina
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
Houston
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
Memphis
|
|
2
|
– |
6
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
9
|
|
Army
|
|
1
|
– |
7
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
– |
11
|
|
|
- + – Conference co-champions
Rankings from AP Poll
|
|
2003 Conference USA football standings
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Overall
|
Team |
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
L |
|
Southern Miss $
|
|
8
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
– |
4
|
|
No. 24 TCU
|
|
7
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
– |
2
|
|
Memphis
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
– |
4
|
|
Louisville
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
– |
4
|
|
South Florida
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
4
|
|
Houston
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
6
|
|
UAB
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
Tulane
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
Cincinnati
|
|
2
|
– |
6
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
East Carolina
|
|
1
|
– |
7
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
– |
11
|
|
Army
|
|
0
|
– |
8
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
13
|
|
|
Rankings from AP Poll
|
|
|
2005 Conference USA football standings
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Overall
|
Team |
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
L |
|
East Division
|
UCF x
|
|
7
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
5
|
|
Southern Miss
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
5
|
|
Memphis
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
5
|
|
East Carolina
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
6
|
|
Marshall
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
7
|
|
UAB
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
6
|
|
West Division
|
Tulsa x$
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
– |
4
|
|
UTEP
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
4
|
|
Houston
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
– |
6
|
|
SMU
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
6
|
|
Tulane
|
|
1
|
– |
7
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
– |
9
|
|
Rice
|
|
1
|
– |
7
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
– |
10
|
|
Championship: Tulsa 44, UCF 27
|
- $ – Conference champion
- x – Division champion/co-champions
Rankings from AP Poll
|
|
|
2007 Conference USA football standings
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Overall
|
Team |
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
L |
|
East Division
|
UCF x$
|
|
7
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
– |
4
|
|
East Carolina
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
5
|
|
Memphis
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
6
|
|
Southern Miss
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
6
|
|
Marshall
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
9
|
|
UAB
|
|
1
|
– |
7
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
– |
10
|
|
West Division
|
Tulsa xy
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
– |
4
|
|
Houston x
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
5
|
|
Tulane
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
Rice
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
9
|
|
UTEP
|
|
2
|
– |
6
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
SMU
|
|
0
|
– |
8
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
– |
11
|
|
Championship: UCF 44, Tulsa 25
|
- $ – Conference champion
- x – Division champion/co-champions
- y – Championship game participant
Rankings from AP Poll
|
|
2008 Conference USA football standings
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Overall
|
Team |
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
L |
|
East Division
|
East Carolina x$
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
– |
5
|
|
Memphis
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
– |
7
|
|
Southern Miss
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
6
|
|
UAB
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
UCF
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
Marshall
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
West Division
|
Tulsa xy
|
|
7
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
– |
3
|
|
Rice x
|
|
7
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
– |
3
|
|
Houston
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
5
|
|
UTEP
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
Tulane
|
|
1
|
– |
7
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
– |
10
|
|
SMU
|
|
0
|
– |
8
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
– |
11
|
|
Championship: East Carolina 27, Tulsa 24
|
- $ – Conference champion
- x – Division champion/co-champions
- y – Championship game participant
Rankings from AP Poll
|
|
2009 Conference USA football standings
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Overall
|
Team |
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
L |
|
East Division
|
East Carolina x$
|
|
7
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
– |
5
|
|
UCF
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
5
|
|
Southern Miss
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
6
|
|
Marshall
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
6
|
|
UAB
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
Memphis
|
|
1
|
– |
7
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
– |
10
|
|
West Division
|
Houston xy
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
– |
4
|
|
SMU x
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
5
|
|
Tulsa
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
UTEP
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
Rice
|
|
2
|
– |
6
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
– |
10
|
|
Tulane
|
|
1
|
– |
7
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
9
|
|
Championship: East Carolina 38, Houston 32
|
- $ – Conference champion
- x – Division champion/co-champions
- y – Championship game participant
Rankings from AP Poll
|
|
2010 Conference USA football standings
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Overall
|
Team |
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
L |
|
East Division
|
No. 21 UCF x$
|
|
7
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
– |
3
|
|
East Carolina
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
– |
7
|
|
Southern Miss
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
5
|
|
Marshall
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
UAB
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
Memphis
|
|
0
|
– |
8
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
– |
11
|
|
West Division
|
SMU xy
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
7
|
|
No. 24 Tulsa x
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
– |
3
|
|
Houston
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
UTEP
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
– |
7
|
|
Rice
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
Tulane
|
|
2
|
– |
6
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
Championship: UCF 17, SMU 7
|
- $ – Conference champion
- x – Division champion/co-champions
- y – Championship game participant
As of January 11, 2011; Rankings from AP Poll
|
|
2011 Conference USA football standings
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Overall
|
Team |
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
L |
|
East Division
|
No. 20 Southern Miss x$
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
– |
2
|
|
Marshall
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
6
|
|
East Carolina
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
UAB
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
9
|
|
UCF
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
Memphis
|
|
1
|
– |
7
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
– |
10
|
|
West Division
|
No. 18 Houston x
|
|
8
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
– |
1
|
|
Tulsa
|
|
7
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
5
|
|
SMU
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
5
|
|
Rice
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
UTEP
|
|
2
|
– |
6
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
Tulane
|
|
1
|
– |
7
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
– |
11
|
|
Championship: Southern Miss 49, Houston 28
|
- $ – Conference champion
- x – Division champion/co-champions
As of January 10, 2012; Rankings from AP Poll
|
|
2012 Conference USA football standings
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Overall
|
Team |
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
L |
|
East Division
|
UCF xy
|
|
7
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
– |
4
|
|
East Carolina x
|
|
7
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
5
|
|
Marshall
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
Memphis
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
UAB
|
|
2
|
– |
6
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
9
|
|
Southern Miss
|
|
0
|
– |
8
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
12
|
|
West Division
|
Tulsa xy$
|
|
7
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
– |
3
|
|
SMU
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
6
|
|
Rice
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
6
|
|
Houston
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
UTEP
|
|
2
|
– |
6
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
9
|
|
Tulane
|
|
2
|
– |
6
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
– |
10
|
|
Championship: Tulsa 33, UCF 27
|
- $ – Conference champion
- x – Division champion/co-champions
- y – Championship game participant
Rankings from AP Poll
|
|
2013 Conference USA football standings
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Overall
|
Team |
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
L |
|
East Division
|
Marshall x
|
|
7
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
– |
4
|
|
East Carolina
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
– |
3
|
|
Middle Tennessee
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
5
|
|
Florida Atlantic
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
– |
6
|
|
UAB
|
|
1
|
– |
7
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
– |
10
|
|
Southern Miss
|
|
1
|
– |
7
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
– |
11
|
|
FIU
|
|
1
|
– |
7
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
– |
11
|
|
West Division
|
Rice x$
|
|
7
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
– |
4
|
|
UTSA
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
5
|
|
North Texas
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
– |
4
|
|
Tulane
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
6
|
|
Louisiana Tech
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
Tulsa
|
|
2
|
– |
6
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
9
|
|
UTEP
|
|
1
|
– |
7
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
– |
10
|
|
Championship: Rice 41, Marshall 24
|
- $ – Conference champion
- x – Division champion/co-champions
Rankings from AP Poll
|
|
2014 Conference USA football standings
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Overall
|
Team |
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
L |
|
East Division
|
No. 23 Marshall x$
|
|
7
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
– |
1
|
|
Middle Tennessee
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
– |
6
|
|
Western Kentucky
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
5
|
|
UAB
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
– |
6
|
|
Old Dominion*
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
– |
6
|
|
FIU
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
Florida Atlantic
|
|
2
|
– |
6
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
9
|
|
West Division
|
Louisiana Tech x
|
|
7
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
– |
5
|
|
Rice
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
5
|
|
UTEP
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
6
|
|
UTSA
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
North Texas
|
|
2
|
– |
6
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
Southern Miss
|
|
1
|
– |
7
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
9
|
|
|
Championship: Marshall 26, Louisiana Tech 23
|
- $ – Conference champion
- x – Division champion/co-champions
- * Ineligible for postseason bowl due to transition from FCS
As of 22:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC); Rankings from AP Poll
|
|
2015 Conference USA football standings
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Overall
|
Team |
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
L |
|
East Division
|
No. 24 Western Kentucky x$
|
|
8
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
– |
2
|
|
Middle Tennessee
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
6
|
|
Marshall
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
– |
3
|
|
FIU
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
Old Dominion
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
Florida Atlantic
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
9
|
|
Charlotte*
|
|
0
|
– |
8
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
– |
10
|
|
West Division
|
Southern Miss x
|
|
7
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
– |
5
|
|
Louisiana Tech
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
– |
4
|
|
UTSA
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
9
|
|
UTEP
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
Rice
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
North Texas
|
|
1
|
– |
7
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
– |
11
|
|
|
Championship: Western Kentucky 45, Southern Miss 28
|
- $ – Conference champion
- x – Division champion/co-champions
- * Ineligible for postseason bowl due to transition from FCS
As of January 12, 2015; Rankings from AP Poll
|
|
2016 Conference USA football standings
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Overall
|
Team |
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
L |
|
East Division
|
Western Kentucky xy$
|
|
7
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
– |
3
|
|
Old Dominion x
|
|
7
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
– |
3
|
|
Middle Tennessee
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
5
|
|
FIU
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
Marshall
|
|
2
|
– |
6
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
9
|
|
Florida Atlantic
|
|
2
|
– |
6
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
9
|
|
West Division
|
Louisiana Tech xy
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
– |
5
|
|
UTSA
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
– |
7
|
|
Southern Miss
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
6
|
|
North Texas
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
8
|
|
Rice
|
|
2
|
– |
6
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
9
|
|
UTEP
|
|
2
|
– |
6
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
|
Championship: Western Kentucky 58, Louisiana Tech 44
|
- $ – Conference champion
- x – Division champion/co-champions
- y – Championship game participant
Rankings from AP Poll
|
|
2017 Conference USA football standings
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Overall
|
Team |
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
L |
|
East Division
|
Florida Atlantic x$
|
|
8
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
– |
3
|
|
FIU
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
5
|
|
Marshall
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
5
|
|
Western Kentucky
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
– |
7
|
|
Middle Tennessee
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
6
|
|
Old Dominion
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
1
|
– |
7
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
– |
11
|
|
West Division
|
North Texas x
|
|
7
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
– |
5
|
|
UAB
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
5
|
|
Southern Miss
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
5
|
|
Louisiana Tech
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
6
|
|
UTSA
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
– |
5
|
|
Rice
|
|
1
|
– |
7
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
– |
11
|
|
UTEP
|
|
0
|
– |
8
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
12
|
|
|
Championship: Florida Atlantic 41, North Texas 17
|
- $ – Conference champion
- x – Division champion/co-champions
Rankings from AP Poll
|
|
|
2019 Conference USA football standings
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Overall
|
Team |
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
L |
|
East Division
|
Florida Atlantic xy$
|
|
7
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
– |
3
|
|
Marshall
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
– |
5
|
|
Western Kentucky
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
– |
4
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
6
|
|
Middle Tennessee
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
FIU
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
– |
7
|
|
Old Dominion
|
|
0
|
– |
8
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
– |
11
|
|
West Division
|
UAB xy
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
– |
5
|
|
Louisiana Tech x
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
– |
3
|
|
Southern Miss
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
6
|
|
North Texas
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
UTSA
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
Rice
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
9
|
|
UTEP
|
|
0
|
– |
8
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
– |
11
|
|
Championship: Florida Atlantic 49, UAB 6
|
- $ – Conference champion
- x – Division champion/co-champions
- y – Championship game participant
|
|
2020 Conference USA football standings
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Overall
|
Team |
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
L |
|
East Division
|
Marshall xy
|
|
4
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
3
|
|
Florida Atlantic
|
|
4
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
4
|
|
Western Kentucky
|
|
4
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
2
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
– |
4
|
|
Middle Tennessee
|
|
2
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
6
|
|
FIU
|
|
0
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
5
|
|
West Division
|
UAB xy$
|
|
3
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
– |
3
|
|
UTSA
|
|
5
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
5
|
|
Louisiana Tech
|
|
4
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
5
|
|
North Texas
|
|
3
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
6
|
|
Rice
|
|
2
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
– |
3
|
|
Southern Miss
|
|
2
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
7
|
|
UTEP
|
|
0
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
Championship: UAB 22, Marshall 13
|
- $ – Conference champion
- x – Division champion/co-champions
- y – Championship game participant
- Note: Due to COVID-19, Old Dominion opted out of the season.
|
|
2021 Conference USA football standings
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Overall
|
Team |
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
L |
|
East Division
|
Western Kentucky xy
|
|
7
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
– |
5
|
|
Marshall
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
6
|
|
Old Dominion
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
– |
7
|
|
Middle Tennessee
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
6
|
|
Florida Atlantic
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
– |
7
|
|
FIU
|
|
0
|
– |
8
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
– |
11
|
|
West Division
|
UTSA xy$
|
|
7
|
– |
1
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
– |
2
|
|
UAB
|
|
6
|
– |
2
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
– |
4
|
|
North Texas
|
|
5
|
– |
3
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
– |
7
|
|
UTEP
|
|
4
|
– |
4
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
– |
6
|
|
Rice
|
|
3
|
– |
5
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
– |
8
|
|
Southern Miss
|
|
2
|
– |
6
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
9
|
|
Louisiana Tech
|
|
2
|
– |
6
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
– |
9
|
|
Championship: UTSA 49, Western Kentucky 41
|
- $ – Conference champion
- x – Division champion/co-champions
- y – Championship game participant
|
|
|
|
Conf |
|
|
Overall
|
Team |
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
L |
|
|
|
0
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
0
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
– |
0
|
|
Championship: December 2, 2022
|
As of March 7, 2022; Rankings from AP Poll
|
|