List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 144

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Supreme Court of the United States
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
EstablishedMarch 4, 1789; 233 years ago (1789-03-04)[1]
LocationWashington, D.C.
Coordinates38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444Coordinates: 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
Composition methodPresidential nomination with Senate confirmation
Authorized byConstitution of the United States, Art. III, § 1
Judge term lengthlife tenure, subject to impeachment and removal
Number of positions9 (by statute)
Websitesupremecourt.gov

This is a list of the 71 cases reported in volume 144 of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1892.

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 144 U.S.[]

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).[2] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice).

When the cases in volume 144 U.S. were decided the Court comprised the following eight members (Justice Joseph P. Bradley had died in January 1892):

Portrait Justice Office Home State Succeeded Date confirmed by the Senate
(Vote)
Tenure on Supreme Court
Melville Weston Fuller Chief Justice 1908.jpg Melville Fuller Chief Justice Illinois Morrison Waite July 20, 1888
(41–20)
October 8, 1888

July 4, 1910
(Died)
Stephen Johnson Field, photo half length seated, 1875.jpg Stephen Johnson Field Associate Justice California newly-created seat March 10, 1863
(Acclamation)
May 10, 1863

December 1, 1897
(Retired)
JudgeJMHarlan.jpg John Marshall Harlan Associate Justice Kentucky David Davis November 29, 1877
(Acclamation)
December 10, 1877

October 14, 1911
(Died)
Horacegrayphoto.jpg Horace Gray Associate Justice Massachusetts Nathan Clifford December 20, 1881
(51–5)
January 9, 1882

September 15, 1902
(Died)
Samuel Blatchford, US Supreme Court Justice.png Samuel Blatchford Associate Justice New York Ward Hunt March 22, 1882
(Acclamation)
April 3, 1882

July 7, 1893
(Died)
Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar II - Brady-Handy.jpg Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Associate Justice Mississippi William Burnham Woods January 16, 1888
(32–28)
January 18, 1888

January 23, 1893
(Died)
DavidBrewer.jpg David Josiah Brewer Associate Justice Kansas Stanley Matthews December 18, 1889
(53–11)
January 6, 1890

March 28, 1910
(Died)
Portrait of Henry Billings Brown.jpg Henry Billings Brown Associate Justice Michigan Samuel Freeman Miller December 29, 1890
(Acclamation)
January 5, 1891

May 28, 1906
(Retired)

Notable Cases in 144 U.S.[]

United States v. Ballin[]

United States v. Ballin, 144 U.S. 1 (1892), is a Supreme Court decision discussing the constitutional definition of "a quorum to do business" in Congress. The Court, analyzing the constitutional limitations on the United States Senate and House of Representatives when determining their rules of proceedings, held that it fell within the powers of the House and Senate to establish their own rules for verifying whether a majority of their members is present, as required for a quorum under Article I of the Constitution.

Lau Ow Bew v. United States[]

Lau Ow Bew v. United States, 144 U.S. 47 (1892), is a case occurring at the beginning of the era of Chinese Exclusion as well as the formation of the United States courts of appeals. The case set precedents for the interpretation of the rights of Chinese merchants and the jurisdiction of the new courts. The Supreme Court's ruling relied heavily the Burlingame Treaty of 1868, the Angell Treaty of 1880, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and the amendments to the Act in 1884, as well as the Evarts Act of 1891. The case helped to establish not only the rights of the Chinese merchant class, but also informed future cases about the power of the Circuit Courts of Appeal as well as the perception of Chinese immigrants.

Citation style[]

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.

The Judiciary Act of 1891 created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States Circuit Courts of Appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by writ of certiorari.

Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

  • "# Cir." = United States Court of Appeals
    • e.g., "3d Cir." = United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  • "C.C.D." = United States Circuit Court for the District of . . .
    • e.g.,"C.C.D.N.J." = United States Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
  • "D." = United States District Court for the District of . . .
    • e.g.,"D. Mass." = United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
  • "E." = Eastern; "M." = Middle; "N." = Northern; "S." = Southern; "W." = Western
    • e.g.,"C.C.S.D.N.Y." = United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York
    • e.g.,"M.D. Ala." = United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
  • "Ct. Cl." = United States Court of Claims
  • The abbreviation of a state's name alone indicates the highest appellate court in that state's judiciary at the time.
    • e.g.,"Pa." = Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    • e.g.,"Me." = Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

List of cases in volume 144 U.S.[]

Case Name Page & year Opinion of the Court Concurring opinion(s) Dissenting opinion(s) Lower Court Disposition of case
United States v. Ballin 1 (1892) Brewer none none C.C.S.D.N.Y. reversed
Ansonia Brass & Copper Co. v. Electrical Supply Co. 11 (1892) Brown none none C.C.D. Conn. affirmed
Larkin v. Upton 19 (1892) Brewer none none Sup. Ct. Terr. Mont. affirmed
United States v. Wilson 24 (1892) Lamar none none Ct. Cl. affirmed
Heinze v. Arthur's Ex'rs 28 (1892) Blatchford none none C.C.S.D.N.Y. reversed
Liebenroth v. Robertson 35 (1892) Blatchford none none C.C.S.D.N.Y. reversed
Wilson v. Seligman 41 (1892) Gray none none C.C.E.D. Mo. affirmed
Lau Ow Bew v. United States 47 (1892) Fuller none none 9th Cir. reversed
Butler v. National Home 64 (1892) Harlan none Brown C.C.D. Mass. reversed
Kent v. Lake Superior S.C. Ry. & I. Co. 75 (1892) Fuller none none C.C.E.D.N.Y. affirmed
In re Heath 92 (1892) Fuller none none Sup. Ct. D.C. dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Gordon v. Third Nat'l Bank 97 (1892) Fuller none none C.C.N.D. Ala. affirmed
Camden v. Stuart 104 (1892) Brown none none C.C.D.W. Va. affirmed
Lacassagne v. Chapuis 119 (1892) Blatchford none none C.C.W.D. La. affirmed as modified
Tripp v. Santa Rosa St. R.R. Co. 126 (1892) Fuller none none Cal. dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Haley v. Breeze 130 (1892) Fuller none none Colo. dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Southern K. Ry. Co. v. Briscoe 133 (1892) Fuller none none C.C.W.D. Ark. affirmed
Dillman v. Hastings 136 (1892) Fuller none none C.C.N.D. Ohio reversed
Bedon v. Davie 142 (1892) Blatchford none none C.C.D.S.C. affirmed
United States v. Budd 154 (1892) Brewer none Brown C.C.D. Wash. affirmed
City of Brenham v. German Am. Bank I 173 (1892) Blatchford none Harlan C.C.W.D. Tex. reversed
Rice v. Sanger 197 (1892) Fuller none none Kan. dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Sherman v. Grinnell 198 (1892) Fuller none none N.Y. City Ct. dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Columbia & P.S.R.R. Co. v. Hawthorne 202 (1892) Gray none none Sup. Ct. Terr. Wash. reversed
Red River Cattle Co. v. Sully 209 (1892) Fuller none none C.C.N.D. Tex. affirmed
Missouri ex rel. Quincy, M. & P.R.R. Co. v. Harris 210 (1892) Fuller none none Mo. dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Glaspell v. Northern P.R.R. Co. 211 (1892) Fuller none none C.C.D.N.D. reversed
Pope Mfg. Co. v. Gormully I 224 (1892) Brown none none C.C.N.D. Ill. affirmed
Pope Mfg. Co. v. Gormully II 238 (1892) Brown none none C.C.N.D. Ill. affirmed
Pope Mfg. Co. v. Gormully III 248 (1892) Brown none none C.C.N.D. Ill. affirmed
Pope Mfg. Co. v. Gormully IV 254 (1892) Brown none none C.C.N.D. Ill. affirmed
McLane v. King 260 (1892) Brewer none none C.C.W.D. Tex. affirmed
Logan v. United States 263 (1892) Gray none Lamar C.C.N.D. Tex. reversed
United States v. Sanges 310 (1892) Gray none none C.C.N.D. Ga. dismissed for want of jurisdiction
O'Neil v. Vermont 323 (1892) Blatchford none Field Vt. dismissed
The Blue Jacket 371 (1892) Blatchford none none Sup. Ct. Terr. Wash. affirmed
Waterman v. Banks 394 (1892) Harlan none none C.C.N.D. Cal. reversed
Porter v. Banks 407 (1892) per curiam none none C.C.N.D. Cal. reversed
Grand Trunk Ry. Co. v. Ives 408 (1892) Lamar none none C.C.E.D. Mich. affirmed
Keator Lumber Co. v. Thompson 434 (1892) Harlan none none C.C.N.D. Ill. affirmed
Hartford Life Annuity Ins. Co. v. Unsell 439 (1892) Harlan none none C.C.E.D. Mo. affirmed
Dodge v. Tulleys 451 (1892) Brewer none none C.C.D. Neb. affirmed as modified
Northern P.R.R. Co. v. Ellis 458 (1892) Fuller none none Wis. dismissed
Northern P.R.R. Co. v. Amato 465 (1892) Blatchford none Brewer 2d Cir. affirmed
Chateaugay Ore & Iron Co. v. Blake 476 (1892) Brewer none none C.C.S.D.N.Y. affirmed
Belford v. Scribner 488 (1892) Blatchford none none C.C.N.D. Ill. affirmed
Smith v. Gale 509 (1892) Brown none none Sup. Ct. Terr. Dakota affirmed
Torrence v. Shedd 527 (1892) Gray none none C.C.N.D. Ill. reversed
Sharon v. Tucker 533 (1892) Field none none Sup. Ct. D.C. reversed
Stellwagen v. Tucker 548 (1892) per curiam none none Sup. Ct. D.C. reversed
City of Brenham v. German Am. Bank II 549 (1892) per curiam none none C.C.W.D. Tex. rehearing denied
Coosaw Mining Co. v. South Carolina 550 (1892) Harlan none none C.C.D.S.C. affirmed
Kellam v. Keith 568 (1892) Fuller none none C.C.D. Kan. reversed
United States ex rel. Jones v. Macon Cnty. 568 (1892) Fuller none none C.C.E.D. Mo. affirmed
National Exch. Bank v. Peters 570 (1892) Fuller none none C.C.E.D. Va. dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Brown v. Massachusetts 573 (1892) Gray none none Mass. Super. Ct. dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Windett v. Union Mut. Life Ins. Co. 581 (1892) Gray none none C.C.N.D. Ill. affirmed
Crawford v. Neal 585 (1892) Fuller none none C.C.D. Or. affirmed
Meyerheim v. Robertson 601 (1892) Blatchford none none C.C.S.D.N.Y. affirmed
Robertson v. Salomon 603 (1892) Blatchford none none C.C.S.D.N.Y. reversed
Nesbit v. Riverside Independent Dist. 610 (1892) Brewer none none C.C.N.D. Iowa affirmed
Crotty v. Union Mut. Life Ins. Co. 621 (1892) Brewer none none C.C.N.D. Cal. affirmed
White v. Rankin 628 (1892) Blatchford none none C.C.N.D. Cal. reversed
Pendleton v. Russell 640 (1892) Field none none N.Y. Sup. Ct. affirmed
Sage v. Louisiana Bd. of Liquidation 647 (1892) Field none none La. dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Adams v. Louisiana Bd. of Liquidation 651 (1892) Field none none La. dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Roberts v. Lewis 653 (1892) Gray none none C.C.D. Neb. reversed
Kendall v. San Juan Silver Mining Co. 658 (1892) Field none none Colo. affirmed
Gregory v. Boston Safe Deposit & Tr. Co. 665 (1892) Harlan none none C.C.D. Mass. decree below modified
Underwood v. Metropolitan Nat'l Bank 669 (1892) Blatchford none none C.C.W.D. Mo. affirmed
United States v. Eaton 677 (1892) Blatchford none none C.C.D. Mass. remanded to divided lower court

Notes and references[]

  1. ^ Lawson, Gary; Seidman, Guy (2001). "When Did the Constitution Become Law?". Notre Dame Law Review. 77: 1–37.
  2. ^ "Supreme Court Research Guide". Georgetown Law Library. Retrieved April 7, 2021.

External links[]

Retrieved from ""