Lupanar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Lupanar at VII, 12, 18–20. Vico del Lupanare is on the right. Vico del Balcone is to the left.

The Lupanar of Pompeii is the ruins of a brothel in the Ancient Roman city of Pompeii. It is of particular interest for the erotic paintings on its walls. Lupanar is Latin for "brothel". The Pompeii lupanar is also known as Lupanare Grande or the "Purpose-Built Brothel".

Location[]

The Lupanar (VII, 12, 18–20) is located approximately two blocks east of the forum at the intersection of Vico del Lupanare and Vico del Balcone Pensile.[1]

This specific location was considered a popular social hub or a "piazza" based on graffiti that included sports tournament advertisements, political propaganda, and other more colloquial messages. Scholars have discovered there to be a great deal of foot traffic around the outside of the brothel.[2]

Treatment as Site[]

19th century guides and historians often refused to examine or discuss the brothels due to their own moral agendas. Although historians were initially hesitant to provide insight into ancient brothels to the public, the Lupanar is now a widely visited tourist attraction within Pompeii.[3]

Late 19th century historian, Wolfgang Helbig made the statement that "an analysis of individual paintings [from the brothel] is unnecessary and inadmissible."[4] It was not until the 20th century that scholars began taking excavations of Ancient brothels seriously. Ancient erotic art became a popular mode of study to offer insight into Greco-Roman sexuality, partnership, and power dynamics.

The reception of the brothel by patrons and visitors exemplified the class disparities within the brothel. Upper-class visitors were known to skew the representation of the brothel deriving from their own classism. Although they often described the space as filthy or unappealing, scholars have declared such recollections to be biased and untrustworthy.[5]

Brothels[]

One of the roughly carved stone beds in the lupanar

The Roman word for brothel was lupanar, meaning a wolf den, and a prostitute was called a lupa ("she-wolf").[6][7]

Early Pompeian excavators, guided by the strict modesty of the time period, quickly classified any building containing erotic paintings as brothels. Using this metric, Pompeii had 35 lupanares. Given a population of ten thousand in Pompeii during the first century CE, this leaves one brothel per 286 people or 71 adult males. Using a stricter standard for identifying brothels[clarification needed] brings the number to a more realistic figure including nine single-room establishments and the Lupanar at VII, 12, 18–20.[8]

Brothels during this period were typically small with only a few rooms. Prostitutes worked out of small, individual rooms. There were no doors or indications of curtain rods for privacy. The prostitute's individual price was often listed next to the door, as determined by their pimps.[9] The Lupanar was the largest of the brothels found in Pompeii with 10 rooms. Like other brothels, rooms in the Lupanar were plainly furnished. A mattress on a brick platform served as a bed.[10]

Graffiti[]

Graffiti inside the Lupanar
Sexual scene from a wall painting at the Lupanar; the woman wears the ancient equivalent of a bra

There have been over 150 graffiti transcribed from the Lupanar at Pompeii. The presence of this graffiti served as one of the criteria for identifying the building as a brothel.[11] Most citizens of Pompeii partook in wall writing as a way of messaging, advertising, gossiping, and spreading important information. Women, children, laborers, and slaves were known to participate in graffiti.[12]

The graffiti within the brothel included both texts and images as well as death notices, poems, etchings, greetings, and compliments.[13]

The Lupanar's graffiti was considered a multi-sensory experience. Because much of the Pompeii population was not completely literate, graffiti was an intentionally interactive experience for all visitors. Patrons and workers were able to not only read the wall text but also speak it aloud, hear it from others, and even physically touch the engravings.[14] Limited spelling and poor grammar and syntax provided insight into the spectrum of literacy amongst the Pompeiian population.

Examples of graffiti from the Lupanar include:

  • Hic ego puellas multas futui ("Here many girls poked").[15]
  • Felix bene futuis ("Lucky guy, you fuck well", a prostitute's blandishment to her client,[16] or "Lucky guy, you get a good fuck"[17]).
  • Sabinus Proclo | salutem ("Sabinus greeting to Proclus"). [18]
  • Ias Magno salute ("IAS welcomes/greets Magnus").[19]
  • Africanus moritur | scribet (!) puer Rusticus | condisce(n?)s cui dolet pro Africano ("Africanus dies. The boy Rusticus writes this. As you learn of this, who is in agony over Africanus?"). [20]
  • Μόλα · φουτοῦτρις ("Mola is a fucktress") [21]

Other examples can be traced to other locations in Pompeii. Persons of wealth generally did not visit brothels because of the availability of mistresses or slave concubines. The graffiti do tell stories, however. Various authors respond to each other's carvings in a sort of dialogue.[22]

The brothel's graffiti provided insight into the demographic as well as the languages spoken within the brothel. Text could be found in Greek, Latin, and the native Oscan language.[23]

Although most of the literate population of Pompeii was male, there are records indicating female literacy. Errors in syntax, grammar, and spelling offered insight into the spectrum of literacy. Many scholars of Ancient Rome have attributed such wall writings including bar advertisements, love letters, greetings, insults, and even financial records to female writers.[24]

The written evidence of fellatio offers insight into the varying perspectives of female prostitutes and male clients. There is wall text that reads, Fortunata fellat ("Fortunata sucks")[25] Scholars can speculate that this graffiti was likely written by a woman as she describes the active position of sucking. This is an important distinction from the word, irrumare which translates to "to mouth-fuck." This verb would have been used by male clients to express the activity of being fellated. [26]

The uneven distribution of graffiti offers insight into the popularity of specific rooms. Most graffiti can be found closest to the entrance which indicates that these rooms were the most often used or even preferred by clients.[27]

Erotic Frescoes[]

The most well-known feature of the brothel are the erotic frescoes that are found lining the hallways above the door lintels.[28] There are eight notable frescoes in total although only seven are still in surviving condition. Of the frescoes still intact, five of them depict intercourse between a male and female.[29] The sixth fresco shows a seated male accompanied by a standing woman; the male gestures towards what scholars believe to be a smaller sex image. The seventh fresco features a prominent deity, Priapus, a male god of fertility known for his permanent and pronounced erection, surrounded by two stylized erections. The eighth fresco is in incredibly poor condition but is believed to depict yet another sexual engagement.[30]

The frescoes were originally discovered during an excavation in 1862. They can be dated back to 72 CE. This is because there is an impression of a coin within the walls' plaster that can be traced back to this date.[31]

The frescoes were intentionally placed above eye level to establish symbolic distance between the viewer (the client) and the sexual journey they were to embark on. The arrangement of the frescoes lead outwards from doorway 18.[32]

Other non-sexual images can be found along the brothel walls including depictions of animals and other decorative patterning. Red paint was most often used to depict such images as proven by its subtle remnants.[33]

Although a wide range of sex acts including oral and homoerotic engagements were shown in graffiti and other artworks across Pompeii, the Lupanar's frescoes solely depict heteronormative intercourse between a male and female party. The Lupanar's frescoes were specifically curated to suggest a purified and idealistic sexual environment to prospective clients. Penetration of the male, oral sex given to a female, and a reversal of traditional gender roles in intercourse were taboo within the Roman society and therefore, often hidden from public view. Many of the erotic frescoes were censored despite depicting blatant sex acts. In the fresco closest to the brothel's entrance, the artist has carefully concealed the female breast as well as the genitalia. Breast bands were often depicted in such works in order to suggest modesty.[34] A female figure's breasts are visible in the fresco found on the southern side of the hallway. The penetration, however, is still discreetly covered.

While the erotic frescoes often did not depict the real sex acts that took place within the brothel, they were supplemental to advertisements for specific prostitutes and activities. Visitors would often look to the frescoes for inspiration before choosing their prostitute and/or service.[35]

Female Prostitutes[]

Female prostitutes were frequently described as characters in Roman literature; however, first-hand accounts of real prostitutes are far more rare.[36] One out of every five prostitutes was a slave. Other prostitutes were forced into work at the brothel as a result of financial crisis and family run institutions. It was quite rare for a prostitute to make enough money to escape working at the brothel.[37]

The life of a prostitute in Pompeii was a challenging one. Whether they were enslaved or merely too poor to deny work, prostitutes hardly refused a client.[38] It was not uncommon for prostitutes to be robbed, beaten, raped, and even killed while working at the brothel. The women inside the brothel faced such abuse by both clients and managers. Because so many prostitutes were slaves, they were often subject to sexual and physical violence. Clients were often possessive and jealous towards their preferred prostitutes and retaliated by threatening and beating them.[39]

One of the most infamous examples of sex worker abuse in Ancient Rome, more specifically northern Africa, involved an enslaved woman named Adultera who was forced to wear a lead collar. The collar featured an inscription that read, "Adultera [is my name], I am a prostitute. Restrain [me] because I have fled from Bulla Regia." Historians have noted that a blacksmith would have hammered the collar shut whilst around her neck. The collar was found still wrapped around the neck of her skeleton.[40] [41]

Prostitutes were not only responsible for physical labor but also emotional labor. The prostitutes of lupanar were expected to offer kindness and support to clients beyond physical affection and sexual favors. Prostitutes were noted to heal wounds and build the self esteems of upset visitors. Many clients pretended the prostitutes were legitimately interested in them as people and sexual partners to create an illusion of love. Sometimes, clients and prostitutes did have long-term relationships as shown in legal texts.[42]

Prostitutes were expected to assist in the maintenance of the brothel. They were also encouraged to engage in conversation with clients and write messages to them on the walls.[43]

Some clients were recorded to frequent the brothel often and enjoyed written statements of their visits. A client by the name of Sollemnis was mentioned twice in the brothel's wall graffiti. One of the texts read, "Sollemnis, you fuck well." It is unclear if the prostitutes wrote this themselves considering literacy was mostly common amongst male populations; however, it is possible that they knew how to express such ideas in text. [44]

Although there was a stigma surrounding sex work in Ancient Pompeii, prostitutes were not hidden from public view. They often interacted outside of the brothel when retrieving water or partaking in other appointed tasks. In their brief moments outside of the Lupanar, the prostitutes were able to spend what little money they made on food, items, and drinks. Because the local fountains and the Lupanar itself was near the popular piazza, prostitutes were granted precious moments of freedom in which they socialized and interacted with the public.[45]

The rampant misogyny of Ancient Rome was greatly detrimental to all lower-class women, as exemplified in their nicknames as "she-wolves." Upper-class Roman men would willfully identify any lower-class woman as a prostitute, especially if she worked outside of the home or alongside men who were not direct family members.[46]

Business Operation[]

The Lupanar of Pompeii was not exclusively a place for prostitution but also a place of leisure for local men. Although upper-class individuals were given elevated treatment within the brothels, laborers and slaves alike were known to frequent the institution for relaxation, socializing, and sexual gratification.[47]

The brothel was a highly profitable business model that involved a specialized investment system that went through groups of pimps and the leasing of slave women. Pimps often determined prices, especially if the prostitute was a slave.[48]

Much of the brothel's profits were made in activities beyond sex acts. The Lupanar also acted as a bar as prostitutes would make and sell drinks to visitors and clients. It has also been noted that the prostitutes themselves were known to drink in order to withstand the common violence they so often faced.[49]

Prostitutes were also recorded to have offered bodily and personal care to clients. Remaining bronze, wide-brimmed vessels were found in the remains of the brothel. Such vessels were most typically found alongside personal care items or toiletries which led scholars to believe these vessels were likely used for bathing and cleaning clients.[50]

Another evidence of bodily care practices was the raschiatoio or "scrapers" found near the water basins. This also led scholars to believe that prostitutes would shave the facial and body hair of clients while inside the brothel. Such findings allowed scholars and historians to better understand the use of water within the brothel and why it was lucrative that prostitutes consistently go the nearby fountains in order to refill and empty the water vessels.[51]

Nearby Fountains[]

Because the brothel did not have its own water supply, water had to be carried from communal fountains nearby. One fountain, to the South of brothel, was located near the cross section between Vicolo del Lupanare and Via dell'Abbondanza. Another fountain could be found at the interaction of Via Stabiana and Via della Fortuna. A third fountain was located to the west of the Lupanar, at the intersection of Vicolo della Maschera and Vicolo del Balcone Pensile.[52]

Prostitutes were expected to fetch water to bring back to the brothel for cleanings, shavings, and other bodily care practices. Although their primary position was to fulfill the client's sexual appetite, they were also responsible for maintaining the brothel's cleanliness and order.[53] After use, the prostitutes would dispose of the used water in the streets or alleyways.[54]

See also[]

Notes[]

  1. ^ "Seeing the Past: Sex, Sight, and Societas in the Lupanar, Pompeii". Archived from the original on 20 November 2012. Retrieved 2007-05-11.
  2. ^ Franklin Jr., James L. (1986). Games and a Lupanar: Prosopography of a Neighborhood in Ancient Pompeii.". The Classical Journal.
  3. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2019). The Brothel of Pompeii: Sex, Class, and Gender at the Margins of Roman Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. ^ Helbig, Wolfgang (1868). Die Wandgemälde der vom Vesuv verschütteten Städte Campaniens. Breitkopf und Härtel: Leipzig.
  5. ^ Gardner, J.F. (1993). Being a Roman Citizen. London.
  6. ^ Mazzoni, Cristina (2010). She-wolf : the story of a Roman icon. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-19456-3.
  7. ^ McGinn, Thomas A. J. (2004). The economy of prostitution in the Roman world : a study of social history & the brothel ([Reprinted] ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Press [u.a.] pp. 7–8. ISBN 978-0472113620.
  8. ^ John R. Clarke (1998). Looking at lovemaking: constructions of sexuality in Roman art, 100 B.C.–A.D. 250. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-20024-1.
  9. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2019). The Brothel of Pompeii: Sex, Class, and Gender at the Margins of Roman Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. ^ Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2002ff. BNP 2, 790–791
  11. ^ Sandra R. Joshel, Lauren Hackworth Petersen (2014). The Material LIfe of Roman Slaves (Hardback ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 1. ISBN 0521191645.
  12. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2019). The Brothel of Pompeii: Sex, Class, and Gender at the Margins of Roman Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2019). The Brothel of Pompeii: Sex, Class, and Gender at the Margins of Roman Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2005). "Sex, Sight, and Societas in the Lupanar, Pompeii". Stanford University.
  15. ^ CIL IV. 2175.
  16. ^ CIL IV. 2175; observation by J.N. Adams, The Latin Sexual Vocabulary (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982, 1990), p. 120 online.
  17. ^ Thomas A McGinn, The Economy of Prostitution in the Roman World (University of Michigan Press, 2004), p. 162.
  18. ^ CIL IV. 2208.
  19. ^ CIL IV. 2231.
  20. ^ CIL IV. 2258a.
  21. ^ CIL IV. 4.2204.
  22. ^ Franklin, James L. (1984). "Games and a Lupanar: Prosopography of a Neighborhood in Ancient Pompeii". The Classical Journal. 81 (4): 319–328. JSTOR 3297215.
  23. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2019). The Brothel of Pompeii: Sex, Class, and Gender at the Margins of Roman Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  24. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2019). The Brothel of Pompeii: Sex, Class, and Gender at the Margins of Roman Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  25. ^ CIL IV. 4.2275.
  26. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2019). The Brothel of Pompeii: Sex, Class, and Gender at the Margins of Roman Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  27. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2005). "Sex, Sight, and Societas in the Lupanar, Pompeii". Stanford University.
  28. ^ Rispoli, Paola; Paone, Rosario; de Carolis, Ernesto (2007). Rivista di Studi Pompeiani. pp. 143–146.
  29. ^ Helbig, Wolfgang (1868). Die Wandgemälde der vom Vesuv verschütteten Städte Campaniens. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.
  30. ^ Guzzo, Pier Giovanni; Ussani, Vincenzo Scarano (2000). Veneris figurae: immagini di prostituzione e sfruttamento a Pompei. Naples: Electa Napoli.
  31. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2005). "Sex, Sight, and Societas in the Lupanar, Pompeii". Stanford University.
  32. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2005). "Sex, Sight, and Societas in the Lupanar, Pompeii". Stanford University.
  33. ^ Fiorelli, Giuseppe (1862). Giornale degli scavi di Pompei. Naples: Stamperia della R. Università.
  34. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2019). The Brothel of Pompeii: Sex, Class, and Gender at the Margins of Roman Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781108655040.
  35. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2005). "Sex, Sight, and Societas in the Lupanar, Pompeii". Stanford University.
  36. ^ McGinn, Thomas (1998). Prostitution, Sexuality, and the Law in Ancient Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  37. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2019). The Brothel of Pompeii: Sex, Class, and Gender at the Margins of Roman Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  38. ^ Bradley, Keith (1987). Slaves and Masters in the Roman Empire: A Study in Social Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  39. ^ Samosata, Lucian (120). Dialogues of the Courtesans.
  40. ^ Thurmond, David (1994). Athenaeum. pp. 459–493.
  41. ^ Trimble, Jennifer (2002). The Ancient Art of Emulation: Studies in Artistic Originality and Tradition from the Present to Classical Antiquity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. pp. 225–248.
  42. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2019). The Brothel of Pompeii: Sex, Class, and Gender at the Margins of Roman Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  43. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2019). The Brothel of Pompeii: Sex, Class, and Gender at the Margins of Roman Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  44. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2019). The Brothel of Pompeii: Sex, Class, and Gender at the Margins of Roman Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  45. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2019). The Brothel of Pompeii: Sex, Class, and Gender at the Margins of Roman Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  46. ^ McGinn, Thomas A.J. (2004). The economy of prostitution in the Roman world : a study of social history & the brothel. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  47. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2019). The Brothel of Pompeii: Sex, Class, and Gender at the Margins of Roman Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  48. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2019). The Brothel of Pompeii: Sex, Class, and Gender at the Margins of Roman Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  49. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2019). The Brothel of Pompeii: Sex, Class, and Gender at the Margins of Roman Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  50. ^ Berg, Ria (2010). "Lo speccio di Venere. Riflessioni sul mundus muliebris nella pittura pompeiana.". Naples: Atti del X Congresso Internazionale Association Internationale pour la peinture murale antique.
  51. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2019). The Brothel of Pompeii: Sex, Class, and Gender at the Margins of Roman Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  52. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2019). The Brothel of Pompeii: Sex, Class, and Gender at the Margins of Roman Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  53. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2019). The Brothel of Pompeii: Sex, Class, and Gender at the Margins of Roman Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  54. ^ Levin-Richardson, Sarah (2019). The Brothel of Pompeii: Sex, Class, and Gender at the Margins of Roman Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coordinates: 40°45′01″N 14°29′12″E / 40.7503°N 14.4868°E / 40.7503; 14.4868

Retrieved from ""