Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery
Specialtyophthalmology

Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is the latest advance in surgical treatment for glaucoma, which aims to reduce intraocular pressure by either increasing outflow of aqueous humor or reducing its production. MIGS comprises a group of surgical procedures which share common features.[1] MIGS procedures involve a minimally invasive approach, often with small cuts or micro-incisions through the cornea that causes the least amount of trauma to surrounding scleral and conjunctival tissues. The techniques minimize tissue scarring, allowing for the possibility of traditional glaucoma procedures such as trabeculectomy or glaucoma valve implantation (also known as glaucoma drainage device) to be performed in the future if needed.[2]

Traditional glaucoma surgery generally involves an external (ab externo) approach through the conjunctiva and sclera; however, MIGS procedures reach their surgical target from an internal (ab interno) route, typically through a self-sealing corneal incision. By performing the procedure from an internal approach, MIGS procedures often reduce discomfort and lead to more rapid recovery periods.[1][2] While MIGS procedures offer fewer side effects, the procedures tend to result in less intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering than with trabeculectomy or glaucoma tube shunt implantation.[3]

Medical uses[]

Glaucoma is a group of in which there is a chronic and progressive damage of the optic nerve.[4] Increased intraocular pressure (IOP) is the main and only modifiable risk factor, attributed to the progression of the disease. During the last 25 years, glaucoma management has been based in the use of pharmaceutical therapies and incisional surgery.[5] MIGS procedures can provide the patient sustained IOP reduction while minimizing the risk and complications associated with glaucoma interventions and decrease the dependence of glaucoma medications.[1]

Adverse events[]

MIGS procedures offer an excellent safety profile, with minimal incidence of complications, especially when compared with other forms of glaucoma surgery.[1][2][6]

Procedures[]

MIGS objective, like all glaucoma surgeries, is to achieve lowering of IOP by either increasing aqueous humour outflow, the fluid that is produced by the eye and fills the space between the cornea and the lens, or decreasing the production of aqueous humour. MIGS can be divided in procedures that lower IOP by using micro-stents and minimally invasive procedures.

Micro-stent/shunt devices[]

iStent[]

The Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent, or simply iStent, is the smallest implantable medical device, designed to lower intraocular pressure by facilitating trabecular outflow of aqueous fluid.[7] The trabecular outflow is one of the major outflow pathways for aqueous humor in the eye and has been the target of both pharmaceutical and surgical therapeutic approaches in glaucoma.[citation needed]

The 1-millimeter long iStent is a titanium device inserted via an internal approach through the trabecular meshwork into Schlemm’s Canal, bypassing the trabecular meshwork and facilitating flow of aqueous from the eye.[1][2][3] Studies have shown that the iStent is an effective procedure, typically lowering intraocular pressure to the mid-teens.[8][9]

The iStent is the first MIGS device to get FDA approval for implantation in combination with cataract surgery.[10] The device has also been shown to offer better IOP control than cataract surgery alone up to one year of follow-up in a large randomized controlled FDA study, although the effectiveness was significantly reduced by 2 years.[11][12] Safety of the iStent was comparable to cataract surgery alone which is much better than conventional trabeculectomy.[11][12][13][14] Common complications include failure to implant the device, touching the iris with the device, and touching the undersurface of the cornea (endothelium) with the device.[15] Multiple studies have since confirmed the MIGS-type efficacy and safety profile of the iStent.[15][16]

To address the reduced effectiveness at 2 years, some studies have been performed with multiple iStents.[17]

A 2019 Cochrane Review found that individuals who receive iStents in combination with cataract surgery may be less likely than those who only receive cataract surgery to need glaucoma eye drops at medium-term follow-up; however, the evidence for this finding was of low quality.[18]

The trabecular micro-bypass stents have been approved for use in the UK by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).[19]

CyPass micro-stent[]

The CyPass Micro-Stent is the first MIGS device developed for lowering of IOP through the suprachoroidal space (virtual space between the choroid and sclera created by implantation of the device), a part of the uveoscleral outflow pathway for aqueous humor. The uveoscleral pathway is an important pathway for aqueous outflow and drainage which can account for up to 57% of total outflow.[20] Cyclodialysis cleft procedures were initially used to access this pathway with significant IOP lowering, but the cleft was prone to high anatomic variability as well as early postoperative closure due to the lack of a permanent drainage implant with a standardized and uniform conduit.[21]

It has a microlumen of 300 microns and is designed to augment outflow to the suprachoroidal space in order to control intraocular pressure; it is indicated for the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma.[22] The stent is implanted through an ab interno approach and inserted into the supraciliary space (between the ciliary body and sclera), effectively creating a controlled cyclodialysis cleft, which is kept open by the device.[23][24]

The first clinical data on the device was presented in 2010 showed sustained IOP lowering and MIGS-like safety profile.[25] This has been substantiated in subsequent studies in the combined setting with cataract surgery and as a stand-alone treatment for patients failing glaucoma topical therapy.[6][23][24][26] Data from a large randomized controlled study has reported positive efficacy after 2 years of follow-up and will be submitted to FDA for approval.[27][28] The CyPass device has been CE-marked since 2009.

The CyPass micro-stent was voluntarily withdrawn from the market by manufacturers Alcon in August 2018.[29]

Hydrus[]

The Hydrus Microstent is an implantable MIGS device for the treatment of primary open angle glaucoma; implantation of this device can be performed in conjunction with cataract surgery.[30] The Hydrus Microstent is the longest of the MIGS devices (8-millimeter long implant), and similar to the iStent it is designed to increase trabecular outflow.

The implant is inserted through the trabecular meshwork, thus bypassing resistance of aqueous flow through the tissue. However, other glaucoma surgeries, such as canaloplasty, have shown that mechanical dilation of is also associated with a reduction in intraocular pressure.[31] The Hydrus Microstent takes advantage of this property by mechanically dilating and holding open Schlemm’s Canal. The length of the Hydrus Microstent is thought to open approximately one quarter of Schlemm’s Canal, routing aqueous into open downstream collector channels.

Clinical data from a randomized controlled study demonstrates efficacy of the device at 1 and 2 years.[32] The Hydrus Microstent is currently being investigated in an FDA approved study for mild-to-moderate glaucoma.

XEN gel stent[]

The XEN Gel Stent is an implantable transscleral microsurgical device that allows the aqueous fluid to drain from the anterior chamber into the subconjunctival space, a pathway utilized by traditional trabeculectomy and glaucoma drainage device surgeries.[33] Unlike the latter two procedures, the XEN Gel Stent is performed through an internal approach and avoids directly incising and disrupting the conjunctiva itself.[34][35]

The 6-millimeter stent is placed through the trabecular meshwork, with one end of the stent sitting directly underneath the conjunctiva, past the outer wall of the sclera. The inner tip of the stent sits in the anterior chamber, allowing a direct connection for aqueous to flow into the subconjunctival space. The stent is made of a non-bioreactive material, which does not promote scarring of the conjunctiva.[34] The XEN Gel Stent was FDA approved on Nov 22, 2016.

InnFocus Microshunt[]

The InnFocus Microshunt is a small tube, 8 mm in length, that is inserted in to the eye to help lower intraocular pressure and reduce the need for medications. A Cochrane Review published in December 2019 did not find any published clinical trials to assess whether the InnFocus Microshunt is safer and more comfortable for patients than standard glaucoma surgery (trabeculectomy).[36]

The InnFocus Microshunt has now been renamed the Preserflo.[37]

Minimally invasive procedures[]

Endocyclophotocoagulation[]

Aqueous humor is produced in the portion of the eye known as the ciliary body. The ciliary body contains 72 protrusions known as ciliary processes, from which the aqueous is produced. The destruction of these ciliary processes with a diode laser, known as cyclophotocoagulation, can be used to decrease the amount of aqueous humor produced, thereby reducing the intraocular pressure.

Cyclophotocoagulation traditionally has been performed using an external laser through the sclera, known as transscleral cyclophotocoagulation. However, side effects of the transscleral approach can include significant inflammation, chronically low intraocular pressure, intraocular bleeding, and permanent shutdown of the eye, known as phthisis.[38][39] Recent advances have now allowed a diode laser to be combined with a camera (endoscope) allowing for direct visualization of the ciliary processes during the ablation (Endo Optiks, Beaver Visitec, Waltham, MA).[40]

Endocyclophotocoagulation is indicated for the treatment of both open and closed angle glaucoma and is performed in eyes which have already undergone cataract surgery or performed concomitantly with cataract removal. The largest investigation of endocyclophotocoaguation has shown a significant decrease in intraocular pressure of up to 10 mmHg, as well as a significant reduction in number of glaucoma medications needed. Reported adverse reactions include intraocular inflammation, bleeding, and cystoid macular edema (swelling of the retina).[41] A Cochrane Review published in 2019 found no relevant published studies on endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation to assess its effectiveness compared to other surgical treatments (including other MIGS), laser treatment or medical treatment.[42]

Trabectome[]

The Trabectome, or trabeculectomy ab interno, is a microsurgical device cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration since 2006, used in patients with open angle glaucoma to excise a strip of trabecular meshwork, the tissue primarily responsible for the increased resistance of aqueous outflow in glaucoma.[43] The Trabectome uses electrocautery via an internal approach to vaporize the trabecular meshwork, creating a large pathway for aqueous to flow, with minimal trauma to surrounding tissues. The procedure can be performed alone or in conjunction with cataract surgery.[44]

Trabectome is unique among the MIGS procedures, as there is no physical device implanted inside the eye; the pressure lowering is a direct result from the destruction and removal of the trabecular meshwork. Studies have found a decrease in intraocular pressure to the mid-teens following the procedure, which has a favorable safety profile.[44][45] The most common complication from Trabectome surgery is bleeding, which can blur vision and take extra time to recover. The surgery site can scar over time and the pressure can go back up.[14]

In early 2014, the NeoMedix received a warning letter from FDA regarding marketing practices.[46]

References[]

  1. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e Saheb H, Ahmed II (March 2012). "Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: current perspectives and future directions". Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 23 (2): 96–104. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834ff1e7. PMID 22249233.
  2. ^ Jump up to: a b c d Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgeries (MIGS)
  3. ^ Jump up to: a b Brandão LM, Grieshaber MC (2013). "Update on Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) and New Implants". Journal of Ophthalmology. 2013: 705915. doi:10.1155/2013/705915. PMC 3863473. PMID 24369494.
  4. ^ Casson RJ, Chidlow G, Wood JP, Crowston JG, Goldberg I (5 April 2012). "Definition of glaucoma: clinical and experimental concepts". Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology. 40 (4): 341–9. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02773.x. PMID 22356435.
  5. ^ Jampel HD (July 2015). "A Quarter Century's Progress in the Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma". Ophthalmology. 122 (7): 1277–9. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.10.005. PMID 26111778.
  6. ^ Jump up to: a b Höh H, Grisanti S, Grisanti S, Rau M, Ianchulev S (April 2014). "Two-year clinical experience with the CyPass micro-stent: safety and surgical outcomes of a novel supraciliary micro-stent". Klinische Monatsblätter Für Augenheilkunde. 231 (4): 377–81. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1368214. PMID 24771171.
  7. ^ "Glaukos: iStent".
  8. ^ Arriola-Villalobos P, Martínez-de-la-Casa JM, Díaz-Valle D, García-Vidal SE, Fernández-Pérez C, García-Sánchez J, García-Feijoó J (October 2013). "Mid-term evaluation of the new Glaukos iStent with phacoemulsification in coexistent open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and cataract". The British Journal of Ophthalmology. 97 (10): 1250–5. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302394. PMID 23603758.
  9. ^ Fea AM (March 2010). "Phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification with micro-bypass stent implantation in primary open-angle glaucoma: randomized double-masked clinical trial". Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 36 (3): 407–12. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.10.031. PMID 20202537.
  10. ^ "FDA: Glaukos iStent".
  11. ^ Jump up to: a b Samuelson TW, Katz LJ, Wells JM, Duh YJ, Giamporcaro JE (March 2011). "Randomized evaluation of the trabecular micro-bypass stent with phacoemulsification in patients with glaucoma and cataract". Ophthalmology. 118 (3): 459–67. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.007. PMID 20828829.
  12. ^ Jump up to: a b Craven ER, Katz LJ, Wells JM, Giamporcaro JE (August 2012). "Cataract surgery with trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma and cataract: two-year follow-up". Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 38 (8): 1339–45. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.025. PMID 22814041.
  13. ^ Gedde SJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL, Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC (January 2007). "Surgical complications in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study during the first year of follow-up". American Journal of Ophthalmology. 143 (1): 23–31. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.07.022. PMID 17054896.
  14. ^ Jump up to: a b Gedde SJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL, Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC (May 2012). "Postoperative complications in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study during five years of follow-up". American Journal of Ophthalmology. 153 (5): 804–814.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.024. PMC 3653167. PMID 22244522.
  15. ^ Jump up to: a b Craven ER, Katz LJ, Wells JM, Giamporcaro JE (August 2012). "Cataract surgery with trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma and cataract: two-year follow-up". Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 38 (8): 1339–45. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.025. PMID 22814041.
  16. ^ Wellik SR, Dale EA (2015). "A review of the iStent(®) trabecular micro-bypass stent: safety and efficacy". Clinical Ophthalmology. 9: 677–84. doi:10.2147/opth.s57217. PMC 4404878. PMID 25931808.
  17. ^ Belovay GW, Naqi A, Chan BJ, Rateb M, Ahmed II (November 2012). "Using multiple trabecular micro-bypass stents in cataract patients to treat open-angle glaucoma". Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 38 (11): 1911–7. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.07.017. PMID 22980724.
  18. ^ Le JT, Bicket AK, Wang L, Li T (March 2019). "Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with iStent for open-angle glaucoma". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 3 (3): CD012743. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012743.pub2. PMC 6437719. PMID 30919929.
  19. ^ "Trabecular stent bypass microsurgery for open angle glaucoma | Guidance | NICE". www.nice.org.uk. Retrieved 2020-10-25.
  20. ^ Toris CB (2008). "Chapter 8: Aqueous Humor Dynamics II – Clinical Studies". Current Topics in Membranes.
  21. ^ Heine L (1905). "Die Cyclodialyse, eine neue glaukomoperation". Dtsch Med Wschr.: 824–826.
  22. ^ Tsontcho I (2014-01-01). "Suprachoroidal Space as a Therapeutic Target". In Samples JR, Ahmed II (eds.). Surgical Innovations in Glaucoma. Springer New York. pp. 33–43. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8348-9_3. ISBN 978-1-4614-8347-2.
  23. ^ Jump up to: a b Garcia-Feijoo J, Rau M, Ahmed I, Antonio A, Grabner G, Ianchulev T (8 September 2012). Safety and efficacy of CyPass Micro-Stent as a stand-alone treatment for open-angle glaucoma: worldwide clinical experience. European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery Annual Meeting. Milan, Italy. pp. 8–12.
  24. ^ Jump up to: a b Saheb H, Ianchulev T, Ahmed II (January 2014). "Optical coherence tomography of the suprachoroid after CyPass Micro-Stent implantation for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma". The British Journal of Ophthalmology. 98 (1): 19–23. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302951. PMID 23743436.
  25. ^ "Minimally Invasive Ab-Interno Suprachoroidal Device (CyPass) for IOP Control in Open-angle Glaucoma - Transcend Medical". Transcend Medical. Retrieved 2016-01-06.
  26. ^ Grisanti S, Margolina E, Hoeh H, Rau M, Erb C, Kersten-Gomez I, et al. (June 2014). "[Supraciliary microstent for open-angle glaucoma: clinical results of a prospective multicenter study]". Der Ophthalmologe (in German). 111 (6): 548–52. doi:10.1007/s00347-013-2927-6. PMID 23958836.
  27. ^ "Transcend Medical touts data, plans FDA filing for CyPass glaucoma stent – MassDevice". MassDevice. Retrieved 2016-01-06.
  28. ^ "Startup Transcend to submit PMA in second half for glaucoma micro-stent after positive pivotal data". FierceMedicalDevices. Retrieved 2016-01-06.
  29. ^ "Alcon announces voluntary global market withdrawal of CyPass Micro-Stent for surgical glaucoma". Novartis. Retrieved 2020-10-25.
  30. ^ "Hydrus™ Procedure | Ivantis". www.ivantisinc.com. Retrieved 2016-01-06.
  31. ^ Hays CL, Gulati V, Fan S, Samuelson TW, Ahmed II, Toris CB (March 2014). "Improvement in outflow facility by two novel microinvasive glaucoma surgery implants". Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55 (3): 1893–900. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13353. PMC 3973188. PMID 24550367.
  32. ^ Pfeiffer N, Garcia-Feijoo J, Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Larrosa JM, Fea A, Lemij H, et al. (July 2015). "A Randomized Trial of a Schlemm's Canal Microstent with Phacoemulsification for Reducing Intraocular Pressure in Open-Angle Glaucoma". Ophthalmology. 122 (7): 1283–93. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.031. PMID 25972254.
  33. ^ "XEN Gel Stent from AqueSys, Inc". www.aquesys.com. Archived from the original on 2015-06-29. Retrieved 2016-01-06.
  34. ^ Jump up to: a b Lewis RA (August 2014). "Ab interno approach to the subconjunctival space using a collagen glaucoma stent". Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 40 (8): 1301–6. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.01.032. PMID 24943904.
  35. ^ Vera VI, Horvath C (2014). "XEN Gel Stent: The Solution Designed by AqueSys®.". Surgical Innovations in Glaucoma. New York: Springer. pp. 189–198.
  36. ^ King AJ, Shah A, Nikita E, Hu K, Mulvaney CA, Stead R, Azuara-Blanco A, et al. (Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group) (December 2018). "Subconjunctival draining minimally-invasive glaucoma devices for medically uncontrolled glaucoma". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 12: CD012742. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012742.pub2. PMC 6517205. PMID 30554418.
  37. ^ "EyeWorld | PreserFlo: The device formerly known as the InnFocus Microshunt". www.eyeworld.org. Retrieved 2020-10-25.
  38. ^ Allingham RR, Damji K, Freedman S, Moroi S, Shafranov G (2005). "Chapter 43. Cyclodestructive Surgery". Shields Textbook of Glaucoma (5th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins. pp. 644–61.
  39. ^ Kahook MY, Noecker RJ, Schuman JS (2008). "Cyclophotocoagulation". Albert and Jakobiec's Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology (3rd ed.). Saunders Elsevier. pp. 2871–4.
  40. ^ Falkenberry SM, Siegfried CJ (July 2009). "Endocyclophotocoagulation". Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology. 16 (3): 130–3. doi:10.4103/0974-9233.56225. PMC 2813596. PMID 20142978.
  41. ^ Chen J, Cohn RA, Lin SC, Cortes AE, Alvarado JA (December 1997). "Endoscopic photocoagulation of the ciliary body for treatment of refractory glaucomas". American Journal of Ophthalmology. 124 (6): 787–96. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71696-4. PMID 9402825.
  42. ^ Tóth M, Shah A, Hu K, Bunce C, Gazzard G (February 2019). Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group (ed.). "Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) for open angle glaucoma and primary angle closure". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2: CD012741. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012741.pub2. PMC 6388466. PMID 30801132.
  43. ^ Francis BA, Singh K, Lin SC, Hodapp E, Jampel HD, Samples JR, Smith SD (July 2011). "Novel glaucoma procedures: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology". Ophthalmology. 118 (7): 1466–80. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.03.028. PMID 21724045.
  44. ^ Jump up to: a b Minckler D, Mosaed S, Dustin L, Ms BF (2008-01-01). "Trabectome (trabeculectomy-internal approach): additional experience and extended follow-up". Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society. 106: 149–59, discussion 159–60. PMC 2646453. PMID 19277230.
  45. ^ Jordan JF, Wecker T, van Oterendorp C, Anton A, Reinhard T, Boehringer D, Neuburger M (December 2013). "Trabectome surgery for primary and secondary open angle glaucomas". Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 251 (12): 2753–60. doi:10.1007/s00417-013-2500-7. PMC 3889259. PMID 24158374.
  46. ^ "FDA Warning Letter Neomedix".
Retrieved from ""