Nardone v. United States
This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. (December 2020) |
Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338 (1939), was a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that evidence obtained via warrantless wiretaps, in violation of the Communications Act of 1934, was inadmissible in federal court.[1] The Court ruled that use of evidence directly obtained from wiretapping, such as the conversations themselves, and indirectly, such as evidence obtained through knowledge gained from wiretapped conversations, was inadmissible in trial court.[1]
References[]
- ^ a b "Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338 (1939)". Justia Law. Retrieved 2020-12-01.
Categories:
- Evidence case law
- Surveillance
- Warrants
- 1939 in the United States
- Telephone tapping
- United States Supreme Court cases
- United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court
- United States Fourth Amendment case law
- United States Supreme Court stubs