Page protected with pending changes

Narmada Bachao Andolan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Narmada Bachao Andolan logo

Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) is an Indian social movement spearheaded by native tribals (adivasis), farmers, environmentalists and human rights activists against a number of large dam projects across the Narmada River, which flows through the states of Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra. Sardar Sarovar Dam in Gujarat is one of the biggest dams on the river and was one of the first focal points of the movement. It is part of the Narmada Dam Project, whose main aim is to provide irrigation and electricity to people of the above states.

The mode of campaign under NBA includes court actions, hunger strikes, rallies and gathering support from notable film and art personalities. The NBA, with its leading spokespersons Medha Patkar and Baba Amte, received the Right Livelihood Award in 1991.[1]

History[]

After India's independence in 1947, under the newly formed government headed by Jawaharlal Nehru, investigations were carried out to evaluate mechanisms for using water from the Narmada River,[2] which flows into the Arabian Sea after passing through the states of Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat. The formation of the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal was triggered by interstate differences in implementing schemes and sharing of water by the Government of India on 6 October 1969 to adjudicate over the disputes.[3] The tribunal investigated the matters referred to it and responded after more than 10 years. The Narmada Tribunal aimed to set out conditions regarding the resettlement and rehabilitation of those displaced by the dams.[4] On 12 December 1979, after ten years of investigation, the decision as given by the tribunal, with all the parties at dispute binding to it, was released by the Indian government.[3]

As per the tribunal's decision, 30 major, 135 medium, and 3000 small dams, were granted approval for construction, including raising the height of the Sardar Sarovar dam.[3] This decision was motivated by the assumption that it would provide water to around forty million people, irrigation, and electricity to people in the region.[5] Thus, the construction began.

In 1985, after hearing about the Sardar Sarovar dam, Medha Patkar and her colleagues visited the project site and noticed that project work being checked due to an order by the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India. The reasons for this was cited as "non-fulfillment of basic environmental conditions and the lack of completion of crucial studies and plans".[6] The people who were going to be affected by the construction of the dam were given no information but the offer for rehabilitation.[7] Villagers weren't consulted and weren't asked for a feedback on the assessment that had taken place. Furthermore, the officials related to the project had not even checked the land records and updated them.[7] While World Bank, the financing agency for this project, came into the picture, Patkar approached the Ministry of Environment to seek clarifications. She realized, after seeking answers from the ministry, that the project was not sanctioned at all and wondered as to how funds were even sanctioned by the World Bank. After several studies, they realized that the officials had overlooked the post project problems.[8]

Through Patkar's channel of communication between the government and the residents, she provided critiques to the project authorities and the governments involved. At the same time, her group realized that all those displaced were given compensation only for the immediate standing crop and not for displacement and rehabilitation.[9]

As Patkar remained immersed in the Narmada struggle, she chose to quit her PhD studies and focus entirely on the Narmada activity.[10] Thereafter, she organized a 36-day solidarity march among the neighboring states of the Narmada valley from Madhya Pradesh to the Sardar Sarovar dam site.[11] She said that the march was "a path symbolizing the long path of struggle (both immediate and long-term) that [they] really had".[12] The march was resisted by the police, who according to Patkar were "caning the marchers and arresting them and tearing the clothes off women activists".[12]

Within the focus of the NBA towards the stoppage of the Sardar Sarovar Dam, Patkar advised adding the World Bank to its propaganda.[10] Using the right to fasting, she undertook a 22-day fast that almost took her life.[13] Patkar's actions did force the World Bank to set up The Morse Commission, an independent review of the project.[14] Their report clearly stated that the Bank's policies on environment and resettlement were being violated by the project.[15] The World Bank's participation in these projects was canceled in 1993.[16] Before the World Bank could pull out, the Indian Government did.[14]

She undertook a similar fast in 1993 and resisted evacuation from the dam site.[13] In 1994, the Narmada Bachao Andolan office was attacked reportedly by a couple of political parties, and Patkar and other activists were physically assaulted and verbally abused.[17] In protest, a few NBA activists and she began a fast; 20 days later, they were arrested and forcibly fed intravenously.[17]

The Sardar Sarovar Dam's construction began again in 1999 after the construction was allowed and was declared finished in 2006. It was inaugurated in 2017 by Prime Minister Narendra Damodardas Modi. Since construction in 2017, the height has been increased from 138 meters to 163 meters.[citation needed]

Formation[]

There were many groups such as Gujarat-based Narmada Asargrastha Samiti, Madhya Pradesh-based Narmada Ghati Nav Nirman Samiti (Committee for a New Life in the Narmada Valley) and Maharashtra-Based Narmada Dharangrastha Samiti (Committee for Narmada Dam-Affected People) who either believed in the need for fair rehabilitation plans for the people or who vehemently opposed dam construction despite a resettlement policy.[18]

Narmada Bachao Andolan was also joined by several NGOs with local people, professionals, and activists as the founders with a non-violent approach.[18] It was led by Medha Patkar. Nationally, they wanted an alternative structure of development and internationally, they wanted to build pressure on the World Bank to take accountability.[19]

NBA's slogans include - Vikas Chahiye, Vinash Nahin! (Development wanted, not destruction) and "koi nahi hatega, bandh nahi banega!" (we won't move, the dam won't be constructed).[20]

Role of the World Bank[]

The World Bank began working on the Narmada Project after it got clearance from the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal.[21] The bank sent a team for the assessment of the project in economic and technical terms. This team didn't focus on the social or environmental issues.[22] What Jawaharlal Nehru thought of as temples of the independent India, i.e. the dams, have already displaced 11 million Indians.[22]

However, the Bank realised the harm that it had done by sanctioning the loan for the project and thus announced that the new projects should "ensure that, after a reasonable transition period, the displaced people regain at least their previous standard of living."[23] Despite this, the relocation process was flawed. Several tribal people have been harmed by the project. The Bank then adopted certain policies to ensure proper relocation of the tribal people and protect them from the forced relocation .[16] The Indian government, however, did not adopt these policies.[24]

In 1985, irrespective of the harm done by the Sardar Sarovar project, the World bank sanctioned a loan to the state governments for construction purposes.[25] The Bank did ask for a proper resettlement design but also said, "The argument in favour of the Sardar Sarovar Project is that the benefits are so large that they substantially outweigh the costs of the immediate human and environmental disruption."[16]

Medha Patkar and other protesters testified on the Bank's role in Washington D.C in 1989. This led to a build-up of pressure on the Bank to set an independent review to assess the situation at hand. A lot of support was withdrawn from the project after this.

The Morse Commission was established to look into the construction of the dam, and the environmental cost and human displacement in 1991.[26] For the first time, a Bank commissioned panel had complete access to the documents to form a report.[16] The 357 pages' report mentioned the lack of any environmental assessment undertaken either by the Indian Government or the World Bank.[16] In an internal referendum held, the Bank very closely voted for the continuation of the Narmada Dam Project.[16]

The Indian Government canceled the loan sanctioned by the World Bank on 31 March 1993.

People involved[]

Medha Patkar

Medha Patkar has been at the forefront of the movement. She has organised several fasts and satyagrahas, and been to jail several times for the cause.

Another popular figure was Baba Amte, known for his work against leprosy. He published a booklet called Cry O Beloved Narmada in 1989 to protest against the construction of the dam.[27]

Amongst the major celebrities who have shown their support for Narmada Bachao Andolan are Booker Prize winner Arundhati Roy[28] and Aamir Khan.[29] It was also supported by music composer and bass guitarist in the band Indian Ocean, Rahul Ram, who was actively involved in the movement from 1990 to 1995.[30]

In 1994 was the launch of Narmada: A Valley Rises, by filmmaker Ali Kazimi.[31] It documents the five-week Sangharsh Yatra of 1991. The film went on to win several awards and is considered by many to be a classic on the issue. In 1996, veteran documentary filmmaker, Anand Patwardhan, made an award-winning documentary: A Narmada Diary.[32] Alok Agarwal, current member of the Aam Aadmi Party, is an active figure in the movement.

Bihar CM Nitish Kumar participated in rally organised by NBA on the bank of Narmada at Rajghat on 16 Sep 2016. Expressing solidarity with the Andolan Mr. Nitish Kumar said "I have come from Patna to extend support to the agitation on the side of river Narmada here".[33]

Supporting the NBA's main demand CM Nitish Kumar appealed to PM Mr Modi at Rajghat saying "Pradhan Mantri ji, don't close the gates of Sardar Sarovar Dam. Rehabilitate people not by giving cash, but giving them alternative land/employment. Don't make plans to drown 2.5 lakh people by closing the gates," he said in a statement released in Barwani.[34]

Decision[]

The court ruled for Andolan, effecting an immediate stoppage of work at the dam and directing the concerned states to complete the rehabilitation and replacement process.[35]

It deliberated on this issue further for several years and finally upheld the Tribunal Award and allowed the construction to proceed, subject to conditions. The court introduced a mechanism to monitor the progress of resettlement pari passu with the raising height of the dam through the Grievance Redressal Authorities (GRA) in each party state. The decision referred in this document, given in 2000 after 7 years of deliberations, has paved the way for completing the project to attain full envisaged benefits. The court's final line of the order states, "Every endeavour shall be made to see that the project is completed as expeditiously as possible".[36]

Subsequent to the verdict, Press Information Bureau (PIB) featured an article:

"The Narmada Bachao Andolaan (NBA)has rendered a yeoman's service to the country by creating a high-level of awareness about the environmental and rehabilitation and relief aspects of Sardar Sarovar and other projects on the Narmada. But, after the court verdict it is incumbent on it to adopt a new role. Instead of 'damning the dam' any longer, it could assume the role of vigilant observer to see that the resettlement work is as humane and painless as possible and that the environmental aspects are taken due care of."[37]

Aftermath and criticism[]

Medha Patkar continues to fight for proper rehabilitation of the displaced people in Madhya Pradesh as well as the reception of the promised compensation by the Narmada Tribunal.[38] This movement has brought forth the different notions of development. The Indian government has often argued that the cost of displacements are outweighed by the benefit derived from the Narmada Project, and thus, justified its construction. NBA, on the other hand has argued no matter how large the benefits, the cost to the society cannot be fulfilled.

Critics argue that dam's benefits include provision of drinking water, power generation and irrigation facilities. However, it is believed that the campaign, led by the NBA activists, has held up the project's completion, and NBA supporters have attacked on local people who accepted compensation for moving.[39] Others have argued that the Narmada Dam protesters are little more than environmental extremists, who use pseudoscientific agitprop to scuttle the development of the region and that the dam will provide agricultural benefits to millions of poor in India.[40][41] There had also been instances of the NBA activists turning violent and attacking rehabilitation officer from Narmada Valley Development Authority (NVDA), which caused damage to the contractor's machinery.[42]

The NBA has been accused of lying under oath in court about land ownership in areas affected by the dam.[43] The Supreme Court has mulled perjury charges against the group.[44]

References[]

  1. ^ "Medha Patkar and Baba Amte / Narmada Bachao AndolanThe RightLivelihood Award". www.right livelihoodaward.org. Retrieved 25 October 2016.
  2. ^ "Relevant dates prior to the constitution of the tribunal". Narmada Control Authority. Retrieved 10 February 2008.[dead link]
  3. ^ Jump up to: a b c "Relevant dates prior to the constitution of the tribunal". Narmada Valley Development Government of Madhya Pradesh.
  4. ^ Narula, Smita (2008). The Story of Narmada Bachao Andolan: Human Rights in the Global Economy and the Struggle Against the World Bank. New York University School of Law. p. 7.
  5. ^ Rajagopal, Balakrishnan. The Role of Law in Counter-Hegemonic Globalization and Global Legal Pluralism: Lessons from the Narmada Valley Struggle in India. Leiden Journal of International Law. p. 358.
  6. ^ Fisher, William (1995). Toward Sustainable Development?: Struggling Over India's Narmada River. M. E. Sharpe. pp. 157–158. ISBN 978-1-56324-341-7.
  7. ^ Jump up to: a b Fisher, William (1995). Towards Sustainable Development?: Struggling Over India's Narmada River. M.E Sharpe. p. 159. ISBN 978-1-56324-341-7.
  8. ^ Fisher, William (1995). Toward Sustainable Development?: Struggling Over India's Narmada River. M. E. Sharpe. pp. 159–160. ISBN 978-1-56324-341-7.
  9. ^ Fisher, William (1995). Toward Sustainable Development?: Struggling Over India's Narmada River. M. E. Sharpe. p. 161. ISBN 978-1-56324-341-7.
  10. ^ Jump up to: a b "Medha Patkar: Biography" (PDF). Women in World History. Retrieved 10 February 2008.
  11. ^ Mehta, Mona G. (12 October 2010). "A river of no dissent: Narmada Movement and coercive Gujarati nativism". South Asian History and Culture. 1 (4): 509–528. doi:10.1080/19472498.2010.507023. ISSN 1947-2498.
  12. ^ Jump up to: a b Fisher, William (1995). Toward Sustainable Development?: Struggling Over India's Narmada River. M. E. Sharpe. p. 166. ISBN 978-1-56324-341-7.
  13. ^ Jump up to: a b "Over Her Dead Body". Mother Jones. 27 June 2006. Retrieved 20 August 2019.
  14. ^ Jump up to: a b Yurchak, Kathleen D.; Rosencranz, Armin (1996). "Progress on the Environmental Front: The Regulation of Industry and Development in India". Hastings International and Comparative Law Review. 19 (3): 515.
  15. ^ Clark, Dana (2002). The World Bank and Human Rights: The Need for Greater Accountability. HARV. HUM. RTS. pp. 205, 217.
  16. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f Caufield, Catherine (1996). Masters of Illusion: The World Bank and the Poverty of Nations. pp. Ch–1.
  17. ^ Jump up to: a b Rowell, Andrew (1996). Green Backlash: Global Subversion of the Environmental Movement. Routledge. p. 285. ISBN 978-0-415-12827-8.
  18. ^ Jump up to: a b Fisher, William (1995). Toward Sustainable Development?: Struggling Over India's Narmada River. M. E. Sharpe. p. 23. ISBN 978-1-56324-341-7.
  19. ^ Narula, Smita (2008). The Story of Narmada Bachao Andolan: Human Rights in the Global Economy and the Struggle Against the World Bank. NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW. p. 5.
  20. ^ Rajagopal, Balakrishnan (2005). The Role of Law in Counter-Hegemonic Globalization and Global Legal Pluralism: Lessons from the Narmada Valley Struggle in India. 18 Leiden Journal of International Law. pp. 365– 366
  21. ^ Caufield, Catherine (1996). Masters of Illusion: The World Bank and the Poverty of Nations. p. 11.
  22. ^ Jump up to: a b Caufield, Catherine (1997). Masters of Illusion: The World Bank and the Poverty of Nations. p. 12.
  23. ^ World Bank Operational Manual Statement No. 2.33: Social Issues Associated with Involuntary Settlement in Bank-Financed Projects.
  24. ^ Rajagopal, Balakrishnan (2005). The Role of Law in Counter-Hegemonic Globalisation and Global Legal Pluralism: Lessons from the Narmada Valley Struggle in India. 18 Leiden Journal of International Law. pp. 345– 355.
  25. ^ Armin Rosencranz, Kathleen D. Yurchak. Progress on the Environmental Front: The Regulation of Industry and Development in India. 19 Hastings International and Company. p. 514
  26. ^ Armin Rosencranz, Kathleen D. Yurchak (1996). Progress on the Environmental Front: The Regulation of Industry and Development in India. 19 Hastings International and Company. p.371.
  27. ^ Narula, Smita (2008). The Story of Narmada Bachao Andolan: Human Rights in the Global Economy and the Struggle Against the World Bank. . p.14.
  28. ^ "Legitimising Narmada Bachao Andolan". The Indian Express. Archived from the original on 22 April 2007. Retrieved 5 April 2008.
  29. ^ Manjeet Warrior, Gajinder Singh (28 March 2008). "Aamir faces trial by torch". The Telegraph. Calcutta, India. Retrieved 5 April 2008.
  30. ^ "Taking life as it comes". The Hindu. 23 August 2014. Retrieved 30 November 2017.
  31. ^ "Narmada: A Valley Rises (1994)". Ali Kazimi. Social Doc. 8 September 2014. Retrieved 7 July 2017.
  32. ^ "A Narmada". Archived from the original on 21 February 2008. Retrieved 13 June 2008.
  33. ^ "Nitish Kumar For Nationwide Liquor Ban". News World India. 17 September 2016. Archived from the original on 30 September 2017. Retrieved 7 July 2017.
  34. ^ "Narmada Bachao Andolan rolls out political red carpet for Nitish in Barwani". The Times of India. Retrieved 10 April 2018.
  35. ^ Miller, Susan. "Narmada dam fails World Bank's final test". New Scientist. Retrieved 9 February 2008.
  36. ^ "Judgment by the Supreme Court of India". Supreme Court of India, Justice Information System. Archived from the original on 3 March 2008. Retrieved 5 April 2008.
  37. ^ Shukla, Dinkar. "Verdict on Narmada 2000". Press Information Bureau, Government of India. Archived from the original on 14 July 2011. Retrieved 5 April 2008.
  38. ^ Narula, Smita (2008). The Story of Narmada Bachao Andolan: Human Rights in the Global Economy and the Struggle Against the World Bank. New York School of Law. p. 34
  39. ^ Kirk Leech (3 March 2009). "The Narmada dambusters are wrong". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 4 March 2009.
  40. ^ "The Lack Of Scientific Rigour In Environmentalist Ideology". 14 December 2007. Archived from the original on 19 February 2012. Retrieved 14 September 2012.
  41. ^ "The Telegraph — Calcutta (Kolkata) - 7days — Goddesses of all causes".
  42. ^ "INDIA TODAY - The most widely read newsweekly in South Asia". archives.digitaltoday.in. Retrieved 10 April 2018.
  43. ^ "Narmada Bachao Andolan and AAP: A match made in rural heaven? - Firstpost". Firstpost. 15 January 2014. Retrieved 25 October 2016.
  44. ^ "Narmada Bachao Andolan faces perjury charges". The Economic Times.

External links[]

Retrieved from ""