Non-Hermitian quantum mechanics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

PT symmetry was initially studied as a specific system in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics,[1][2] where Hamiltonians are not Hermitian. In 1998, physicist Carl Bender and former graduate student Stefan Boettcher published in Physical Review Letters a paper in quantum mechanics, "Real Spectra in non-Hermitian Hamiltonians Having PT Symmetry."[3] In this paper, the authors found non-Hermitian Hamiltonians endowed with an unbroken PT symmetry (invariance with respect to the simultaneous action of the parity-inversion and time reversal symmetry operators) also may possess a real spectrum. Under a correctly-defined inner product, a PT-symmetric Hamiltonian's eigenfunctions have positive norms and exhibit unitary time evolution, requirements for quantum theories.[4] Bender won the 2017 Dannie Heineman Prize for Mathematical Physics for his work.[5]

A closely related concept is that of operators, which were considered by physicists Dirac,[6] Pauli,[7] and Lee and Wick.[8] operators were discovered (or rediscovered) almost simultaneously by mathematicians Krein et al. [9] [10] [11] [12] as G-Hamiltonian in the study of linear dynamical systems. The equivalence between pseudo-Hermiticity and G-Hamiltonian is easy to establish.[13]

In 2002, showed that every Hamiltonian with a real spectrum is pseudo-Hermitian. He found that PT-symmetric non-Hermitian Hamiltonians that are diagonalizable belong to the class of pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians.[14][15][16] However, this result is not useful because essentially all interesting physics happens at the exception points where the systems are not diagonalizable. It was proven recently that in finite dimensions PT-symmetry entails pseudo-Hermiticity regardless of diagonalizability,[13] which indicates that the mechanism of PT-symmetry breaking at exception points, where the Hamiltionian is usually not diagonalizable, is the Krein collision between two eigenmodes with opposite signs of actions.

In 2005, PT symmetry was introduced to the field of optics by the research group of Gonzalo Muga by noting that PT symmetry corresponds to the presence of balanced gain and loss.[17] In 2007, the physicist Demetrios Christodoulides and his collaborators further studied the implications of PT symmetry in optics.[18][19] The coming years saw the first experimental demonstrations of PT symmetry in passive and active systems.[20][21] PT symmetry has also been applied to classical mechanics, metamaterials, electric circuits, and nuclear magnetic resonance.[22][18] In 2017, a non-Hermitian PT-symmetric Hamiltonian was proposed by Dorje Brody, and Markus Müller that "formally satisfies the conditions of the Hilbert–Pólya conjecture."[23][24]

References[]

  1. ^ N. Moiseyev, "Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics", Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011
  2. ^ "Non-Selfadjoint Operators in Quantum Physics: Mathematical Aspects". Wiley.com (in American English). 2015-07-20. Retrieved 2018-06-12.
  3. ^ Bender, Carl M.; Boettcher, Stefan (1998-06-15). "Real Spectra in Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians Having $\mathsc{P}\mathsc{T}$ Symmetry". Physical Review Letters. 80 (24): 5243–5246. arXiv:physics/9712001. Bibcode:1998PhRvL..80.5243B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5243.
  4. ^ Bender, Carl M. (2007). "Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians". Reports on Progress in Physics. 70 (6): 947–1018. arXiv:hep-th/0703096. Bibcode:2007RPPh...70..947B. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/70/6/R03. ISSN 0034-4885.
  5. ^ "Dannie Heineman Prize for Mathematical Physics".
  6. ^ "Bakerian Lecture - The physical interpretation of quantum mechanics". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 180 (980): 1–40. 18 March 1942. doi:10.1098/rspa.1942.0023.
  7. ^ Pauli, W. (1 July 1943). "On Dirac's New Method of Field Quantization". Reviews of Modern Physics. 15 (3): 175–207. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.15.175.
  8. ^ Lee, T.D.; Wick, G.C. (February 1969). "Negative metric and the unitarity of the S-matrix". Nuclear Physics B. 9 (2): 209–243. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(69)90098-4.
  9. ^ M. G. Krein, “A generalization of some investigations of A. M. Lyapunov on linear differential equations with periodic coefficients,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR N.S. 73, 445 (1950) (Russian).
  10. ^ M. G. Krein, Topics in Differential and Integral Equations and Operator Theory (Birkhauser, 1983).
  11. ^ I. M. Gel’fand and V. B. Lidskii, “On the structure of the regions of stability of linear canonical systems of differential equations with periodic coefficients,” Usp. Mat. Nauk 10:1(63), 3−40 (1955) (Russian).
  12. ^ V. Yakubovich and V. Starzhinskii, Linear Differential Equations with Periodic Coefficients (Wiley, 1975), Vol. I.
  13. ^ a b Zhang, Ruili; Qin, Hong; Xiao, Jianyuan (2020-01-01). "PT-symmetry entails pseudo-Hermiticity regardless of diagonalizability". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 61 (1): 012101. arXiv:1904.01967. doi:10.1063/1.5117211. ISSN 0022-2488.
  14. ^ Mostafazadeh, Ali (2002). "Pseudo-Hermiticity versus symmetry: The necessary condition for the reality of the spectrum of a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 43 (1): 205–214. arXiv:math-ph/0107001. Bibcode:2002JMP....43..205M. doi:10.1063/1.1418246. ISSN 0022-2488.
  15. ^ Mostafazadeh, Ali (2002). "Pseudo-Hermiticity versus PT-symmetry. II. A complete characterization of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians with a real spectrum". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 43 (5): 2814–2816. arXiv:math-ph/0110016. doi:10.1063/1.1418246. ISSN 0022-2488.
  16. ^ Mostafazadeh, Ali (2002). "Pseudo-Hermiticity versus PT-symmetry III: Equivalence of pseudo-Hermiticity and the presence of antilinear symmetries". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 43 (8): 3944–3951. arXiv:math-ph/0107001. doi:10.1063/1.1418246. ISSN 0022-2488.
  17. ^ Ruschhaupt, A; Delgado, F; Muga, J G (2005-03-04). "Physical realization of -symmetric potential scattering in a planar slab waveguide". Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General. 38 (9): L171–L176. arXiv:1706.04056. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/38/9/L03. ISSN 0305-4470.
  18. ^ a b Bender, Carl (April 2016). "PT symmetry in quantum physics: from mathematical curiosity to optical experiments". Europhysics News. 47, 2 (2): 17–20. Bibcode:2016ENews..47b..17B. doi:10.1051/epn/2016201.
  19. ^ Makris, K. G.; El-Ganainy, R.; Christodoulides, D. N.; Musslimani, Z. H. (2008-03-13). "Beam Dynamics in $\mathcal{P}\mathcal{T}$ Symmetric Optical Lattices". Physical Review Letters. 100 (10): 103904. Bibcode:2008PhRvL.100j3904M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.103904. PMID 18352189.
  20. ^ Guo, A.; Salamo, G. J.; Duchesne, D.; Morandotti, R.; Volatier-Ravat, M.; Aimez, V.; Siviloglou, G. A.; Christodoulides, D. N. (2009-08-27). "Observation of $\mathcal{P}\mathcal{T}$-Symmetry Breaking in Complex Optical Potentials". Physical Review Letters. 103 (9): 093902. Bibcode:2009PhRvL.103i3902G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.093902. PMID 19792798.
  21. ^ Rüter, Christian E.; Makris, Konstantinos G.; El-Ganainy, Ramy; Christodoulides, Demetrios N.; Segev, Mordechai; Kip, Detlef (March 2010). "Observation of parity–time symmetry in optics". Nature Physics. 6 (3): 192–195. Bibcode:2010NatPh...6..192R. doi:10.1038/nphys1515. ISSN 1745-2481.
  22. ^ Miller, Johanna L. (October 2017). "Exceptional points make for exceptional sensors". Physics Today. 10, 23 (10): 23–26. Bibcode:2017PhT....70j..23M. doi:10.1063/PT.3.3717.
  23. ^ Bender, Carl M.; Brody, Dorje C.; Müller, Markus P. (2017-03-30). "Hamiltonian for the Zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function". Physical Review Letters. 118 (13): 130201. arXiv:1608.03679. Bibcode:2017PhRvL.118m0201B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.130201. PMID 28409977.
  24. ^ "Quantum Physicists Attack the Riemann Hypothesis | Quanta Magazine". Quanta Magazine. Retrieved 2018-06-12.
Retrieved from ""