Nonce word

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A nonce word (also called an occasionalism) is a lexeme created for a single occasion to solve an immediate problem of communication.[1][2]: 132 

Some nonce words may acquire a fixed meaning inferred from context and use, possibly even becoming an established part of the language, at which point they stop being nonce words. Some nonce words may be essentially meaningless and disposable, but they are useful for exactly that reason — the words "wug" and "blicket" for instance were invented by researchers to be used in exercises in child language testing.[3]

Examples[]

One common class of examples arises when giving technical instructions to a non-specialist. For example when disassembling a machine one might give the instruction "Do you see the flanged doohickey between the three blinking lights? Use the spanner to turn it counterclockwise. Then remove the panel. You should see a square compartment with four round gizmos on the corners. . . ." In this example the words 'doohickey' and 'gizmos' are nonce words. The exact nature of a 'gizmo' is unimportant for the instructions, only that it is distinct from the 'doohickey' mentioned before.

Lexicology[]

The term is used because such a word is created "for the nonce" (i.e., for the time being, or this once).[2]: 455  All nonce words are also neologisms, that is, recent or relatively new words that have not been fully accepted into mainstream or common use.[4] The term nonce word in this sense is due to James Murray, the first editor of the Oxford English Dictionary.[5]:25

In child development studies[]

Nonce words are sometimes used to study the development of language in children because they allow researchers to test how children treat words of which they have no prior knowledge. This permits inferences about the default assumptions children make about new word meanings, syntactic structure, etc. "Wug" is among the earliest known nonce words used in language learning studies, and is best known for its use in Jean Berko's "Wug test", in which children were presented with a novel object, called a wug, and then shown multiple instances of the object and asked to complete a sentence that elicits a plural form—e.g., "This is a wug. Now there are two of them. There are two...?" The use of the plural form "wugs" by the children suggests that they have applied a plural rule to the form, and that this knowledge is not specific to prior experience with the word but applies to most English nouns, whether familiar or novel.[6]

Nancy N. Soja, Susan Carey, and Elizabeth Spelke used the nonce words "blicket", "stad", "mell", "coodle", "doff", "tannin", "fitch", and "tulver" when testing to see if children's knowledge of the distinction between non-solid substances and solid objects preceded or followed their knowledge of the distinction between mass nouns and count nouns.[7]

In literature[]

A poem by Seamus Heaney entitled "Nonce Words" is included in his collection District and Circle.[8] Fluddle was reported by David Crystal which he understood to mean a water spillage between a puddle and a flood, invented by the speaker because no suitable word existed. Crystal speculated in 1995 that it might enter the English language if it proved popular.[2] Bouba and kiki is used to demonstrate a connection between the sound of words and their meaning. Grok, coined by Robert Heinlein in Stranger in a Strange Land, is now used by many to mean "deeply and intuitively understand". The poem "Jabberwocky" is full of nonce words, with two of them, chortle and galumph, entering into common use. The novel Finnegans Wake used quark as a nonce word; the physicist Murray Gell-Mann adopted it as the name of a subatomic particle.[9]

See also[]

References[]

  1. ^ "Nonce Word". Cambridge Dictionaries Online. 2011. Retrieved 6 November 2012.
  2. ^ a b c The Cambridge Encyclopedia of The English Language. Ed. David Crystal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. ISBN 0521401798
  3. ^ Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2001, p. 388
  4. ^ Malmkjaer, Kirsten. (Ed.) (2006) The Linguistics Encyclopedia. eBook edition. London & New York: Routledge, p. 601. ISBN 0-203-43286-X
  5. ^ Mattiello, Elisa. (2017). Analogy in Word-formation : a Study of English Neologisms and Occasionalisms. Berlin/Boston, GERMANY: De Gruyter Mouton. ISBN 978-3-11-055141-9. OCLC 988760787.
  6. ^ Lise Menn; Nan Bernstein Ratner (2000). "In the Beginning Was the Wug". In Lise Menn; Nan Bernstein Ratner (eds.). Methods for Studying Language Production. Lawrence Erlbaum associates. pp. 1–26. ISBN 978-0-8058-3033-0.
  7. ^ Ontological categories guide young children's inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms. Cognition, 38(2), 179-211. [1]
  8. ^ Heaney, Seamus (2006). District and Circle. Faber and Faber. no. 28. ISBN 0-571-23097-0.
  9. ^ Gell-Mann, Murray (1995). The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex. Henry Holt and Co. p. 180. ISBN 978-0-8050-7253-2.
Retrieved from ""