Oakland Ballpark

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Oakland Ballpark
Oakland Ballpark.jpg
Artist rendering of Oakland Ballpark
Oakland Ballpark is located in Oakland, California
Oakland Ballpark
Oakland Ballpark
Location in Oakland
Address1 Market Street
LocationOakland, California, U.S.
Coordinates37°47′44.7″N 122°17′0.03″W / 37.795750°N 122.2833417°W / 37.795750; -122.2833417Coordinates: 37°47′44.7″N 122°17′0.03″W / 37.795750°N 122.2833417°W / 37.795750; -122.2833417
Public transitAmtrak Amtrak:
Oakland – Jack London Square
Cable car Gondola from Downtown (planned)[1]
Bus interchange AC Transit:
12, 72, 72M, 72R, Broadway Shuttle
ferry/water interchange San Francisco Bay Ferry:
Oakland Ferry Terminal
OperatorOakland Athletics
Capacity34,000[2]
SurfaceGrass
Construction
Construction costUS$500 million+
($528 million in 2020 dollars)[3]
ArchitectBjarke Ingels Group
Tenants
Oakland Athletics (MLB) (TBD–)
Website
Official website

Oakland Ballpark is a proposed ballpark to be built in the Jack London Square neighborhood of Oakland, California. It is proposed as the new home of the Oakland Athletics of Major League Baseball. It would serve as the replacement of their current home at Oakland Coliseum. After several unsuccessful attempts to build a new stadium, both in Oakland and elsewhere, the Athletics landed on their current plan, which is to build a 34,000-seat stadium at Howard Terminal. The site is currently a parcel of land owned by the Port of Oakland in Jack London Square. After securing the site, the Athletics plan to have the stadium built and operational after its lease ends at Oakland Coliseum in 2024.[4]

History[]

Timeline (2001–present)[]

  • 2001 – The Uptown site for a new ballpark is proposed, gets rejected by mayor Jerry Brown.
  • 2005 – The 66th Avenue site is proposed.
  • 2006 – Cisco Field plan is announced in Fremont.
  • 2009 – Fremont location is abandoned after public resistance.
  • 2010 – City of Oakland proposes waterfront site near Jack London Square at Victory Court for a new ballpark.
  • 2011 – City tables the Victory Court site in favor of a proposed three-venue development at the Coliseum site titled Coliseum City.
  • 2012 – Cisco Field in San Jose is announced, the San Francisco Giants object due to territorial rights.
  • 2014 – The A's began talks with an architect to build a baseball-only stadium at the Coliseum site.
  • 2015 – The United States Supreme Court rejects San Jose's bid on the Athletics.
  • 2016 – The team reveals they will choose between the Port of Oakland, Coliseum site, and the Peralta area for a new stadium.
  • 2017 – The team chooses Peralta area of Oakland near Laney College, is rejected by college board and surrounding Chinatown neighbors.
  • 2018 – The team proposes to buy the Coliseum site outright in exchange for paying off the remaining $135 million debt owed by the city of Oakland and Alameda County.
  • 2018 – The team chooses Port of Oakland/Howard Terminal site and releases renderings.
  • 2020 – The timeline for Howard Terminal ballpark is reportedly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • 2021 – Major League Baseball, concerned with the slow progress on the Howard Terminal project, allows the A's to explore relocation options outside of Oakland.

Early plans (2001–2005)[]

The first of the proposed new ballpark sites was a location in Uptown Oakland. In a 2001 study, Populous (formerly HOK Sport) had suggested this location as the prime site for a ballpark. However, plans to build a park there were dismissed by then-Oakland Mayor Jerry Brown due to the concern of the ballpark ruining the housing development of the neighborhood.[5] Brown opted to sell the site to a condominium builder to whom he allegedly had ties. The City of Oakland also considered a site near the Oakland Estuary for a stadium. However, the A's showed no interest in the site due to lack of public transit access. Another possible location was land directly adjacent to the Coliseum to the southeast, which was overflow parking. However, much of that land had already been sold to a condominium developer.[6]

66th Avenue (2005)[]

Oakland Athletics owner Lewis Wolff presented his vision for the team's venue to the Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum Authority on August 12, 2005. The ballpark he proposed would have been on 66th Avenue just north of the Coliseum. The stadium would have been built on what is currently zoned industrial land and would have included a Ballpark Village which would have included shops and either a hotel or apartment building in one of the outfield walls of the park.[7]

Victory Court & Coliseum City (2010)[]

On November 16, 2010, the City of Oakland proposed a waterfront site in the Jack London Square area for a new A's ballpark. The site, called Victory Court, was near the Lake Merritt Channel along the Oakland Estuary. The city conducted an environmental impact report for the Victory Court site and informed Major League Baseball of its decision. The city began accepting public comment on the ballpark EIR at the December 1 Planning Commission meeting held at Oakland City Hall. By the end of 2011, the city had tabled the Victory Court site in favor of a proposed three-venue development at the Coliseum site titled Coliseum City.[8]

Cisco Field[]

Fremont (2006)[]

In April 2006, Lewis Wolff took his Ballpark Village proposal to Fremont, a city 26.5 miles (42.65 km) southeast of Oakland, where a large 143-acre (0.6 km2) parcel of land was available just north of Mission Boulevard and south of Auto Mall Parkway off Interstate 880 and across from Pacific Commons.[9] The land was owned by the real estate firm Prologis and leased to Cisco Systems.[10] A formal press conference to announce the existence of Wolff's ballpark proposal of Cisco Field was held on November 14, 2006. The plan would be to build a 32,000 to 35,000 capacity stadium on the parcel of land in addition to adding housing and shops.[11] Bud Selig, commissioner of Major League Baseball and John Chambers, the CEO of Cisco Systems along with Wolff were in attendance.[12]

The proposal of the ballpark encountered problems such as construction delays, lack of public transportation, and Fremont residents voicing concerns of traffic congestion, noise, and pollution. This led to Wolff officially ending the ballpark search in Fremont on February 24, 2009.[13]

San Jose (2012)[]

In 2012, it was proposed that Cisco Field be constructed in Downtown San Jose immediately adjacent to SAP Center and San Jose Diridon Station at the corner of Montgomery Street and Park Avenue.[14] For the A's to have moved to San Jose, either the San Francisco Giants would have had to rescind their territorial rights on the area, or at least 23 of the 30 MLB owners would have had to vote in the A's favor and force San Francisco to give up their territorial claim to Santa Clara County. Lew Wolff stated, "My goal and desire for the organization is to determine a way to keep the team in Northern California."[15] The Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jose[16] had been acquiring the properties needed at the Diridon South site.[17] The available land, only 12–14 acres (4.9–5.7 ha), would have given rise to a very intimate stadium. As a result of its small size, it was speculated that it would have been very hitter-friendly.[18]

The Giants repeatedly refused to cede their territorial rights to the San Jose area (which had been yielded by the A's in the early 1990s when the Giants had been in danger of relocating to Tampa Bay, previously both teams had shared the South Bay),[19] although the team is open to sharing Oracle Park with the A's on a temporary basis if the A's have plans for a permanent stadium in the works.[20]

In August 2012, Commissioner Bud Selig's Blue Ribbon committee, which had been implemented to study potential ballpark locations for the Athletics, met with both Oakland and San Jose officials. At the Oakland meeting, the committee was met with a proposal for a ballpark on the site of Howard Terminal, a container terminal on the Oakland waterfront near Jack London Square currently owned by the Port of Oakland.[21] Wolff stated the site "has no ability to be implemented for a ballpark."[22] Major League Baseball, however, stated that it was their preferred location for a new ballpark in Oakland, and later developed a plan to develop the location.

On October 5, 2015, the United States Supreme Court rejected San Jose's bid on the Athletics.[23]

Back to Oakland (2014–present)[]

On June 25, 2014, the Athletics reached a 10-year lease agreement with the Oakland–Alameda County Coliseum Authority to stay at the Coliseum. Bud Selig commended both sides for reaching a deal on a lease extension, while offering, "I continue to believe that the Athletics need a new facility and am fully supportive of the club's view that the best site in Oakland is the Coliseum site."[24] On July 16, 2014, the extension was officially approved.[25]

On August 6, 2014, the A's commenced talks with a possible architect to build a baseball-only stadium at the Coliseum site, according to Wolff.[26]

Ownership change (2016)[]

In 2016, Lewis Wolff resigned as the majority owner of the team. John J. Fisher then took over as majority owner. Fisher appointed Dave Kaval as team president and head of the stadium project.[27] Around the same time, the Raiders announced their relocation to Las Vegas in 2020 which in addition to the Golden State Warriors move to Chase Center in San Francisco in September 2019 left the Athletics as the last professional sports team in Oakland. The team revealed three stadium options in 2016, the current Coliseum site, the Peralta area near Laney College, or Howard Terminal at Jack London Square.[28]

Peralta site (2017)[]

After a comprehensive study of three proposed ballpark sites (Coliseum site,[29] Howard Terminal, and Peralta Community College Headquarters District), the A's ownership determined that the best potential site to fit the needs of the A's and create the most community partnership opportunities and benefits was the Peralta site. The team announced that the Peralta site would be the preferred choice for the A's new ballpark on September 13, 2017.[30] The area is located between Lake Merritt and I-880 where there are warehouses, parking lots and administrative offices for the Peralta Community College District.

Opposition to the project included members of the Peralta Federation of Teachers, select student and facility groups of neighboring Laney College and a local coalition of organizations led by the Asian Pacific Environmental Network (APEN). After several months of preliminary discussions amongst the A's and the Peralta Community College's Office of the Chancellor Jowel Laguerre, Chancellor of Peralta Community College District, a statement was issued by the Chancellor indicating that he had been instructed to "discontinue planning"[31] for the ballpark after a closed session meeting of the Peralta Community College District Board of Trustees on the evening of December 5, 2017.[32]

Current plan[]

Howard Terminal in 2018

Ballpark at Howard Terminal proposal[]

In November 2018, a plan for a "jewel box" design for the stadium at Howard Terminal met with a "tepid welcome," with the next version in February 2019 showing a "smoother and more circular stadium." At the time, the A's still had not acquired Howard Terminal.[33]

The A's proposed plan is to build a privately financed, 34,000-seat ballpark at Howard Terminal, including fixed seats and general admission experience areas. The ballpark will feature an elevated park that wraps and frames the bowl, coming down to meet the waterfront and a promenade called Athletics Way. The proposed ballpark is intended to create a new waterfront district with a mixture of real estate, including affordable housing, offices, restaurants, retail, small business space, parks, and public gathering spaces.[34] Bjarke Ingels Group (BIG) was hired as the lead designer in developing plans for both the stadium[35] and the surrounding development around the new ballpark. It was BIG's first Major League Baseball stadium commission.[36] A revised design by BIG came out in February 2019, retaining its rooftop park with community access[37] and developing "3.3 million square feet of housing, 1.5 million square feet of commercial and office space, a hotel and a performance center in the area surrounding the stadium."[38]

Located near Downtown Oakland, the Charles P. Howard Terminal is west of Jack London Square and is adjacent to railroad tracks and large industrial facilities. The 55-acre (22 ha) waterfront property is currently owned by the Port of Oakland. Howard Terminal has not been used by a cargo vessel since 2013. On April 26, 2018, the Port of Oakland commissioners voted 6-0 unanimously to enter in to a one-year agreement to negotiate exclusively with the Oakland A's.[39] This agreement allows the A's to pay the Port $100,000 to study economic feasibility and environmental, transportation and accessibility issues. A similar agreement with the A's regarding the Coliseum site was also agreed upon with the city on May 16, 2017.[40]

By March 2019 the MLB had completed an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Howard Terminal ballpark proposal.[41] On February 22, 2019, the Oakland A's announced a partnership with the West Oakland Environmental Indicators Project (WOEIP) to enhance the long-term sustainability of the neighborhoods of West Oakland and improve the quality of life for local residents. The partnership is part of a series of environmentally focused plans being promoted by the A's, including committing to LEED gold standard of design with the ballpark; a target of reducing car trips to the new ballpark by 20%; achieving net zero emissions; possibly building an electrically powered gondola that connects the ballpark to mass transit; and adding protections to the site in anticipation of future sea level rise caused by climate change. The A's are also working with the City of Oakland on a race and equity analysis to ensure the project produces community benefits for Oakland residents.[42]

Union Pacific, according to the San Francisco Chronicle, voiced concerns over the Howard Terminal as the ballpark's location in April 2019, due to issues of safety concerning the active train tracks on one side of the site. Maritime officials had also voiced concerns that bright lights from the stadium might interfere with the Inner Harbor's shipping traffic at night.[43] On May 11, 2019, the Alameda Labor Council, AFL-CIO, voted to support the Oakland A's efforts to build a new ballpark at Howard Terminal. The Council expressed strong support for the project given its potential to provide significant economic benefits for working families throughout the East Bay. According to a report issued by the Bay Area Council Economic Institute, the privately financed ballpark project would create approximately 2,000 construction jobs and even more permanent jobs would be generated by the ongoing operation of the ballpark. In addition to the A's ballpark project at Howard Terminal, the council also officially endorsed the A's redevelopment project at the Coliseum site, provided it also includes community benefits.[44]

Coliseum redevelopment[]

As part of the ballpark plan, the Athletics have committed to redevelopment of the Coliseum site, which was owned jointly by the City of Oakland and Alameda County. In March 2018, the A's sent a letter to the City of Oakland proposing to purchase the entire Coliseum property, including Oakland Arena and surrounding parking lots, and develop it into a new ballpark and ballpark village in exchange for paying off $135 million of debt owed on the property by the City of Oakland and Alameda County.[45] On April 23, 2019, the Alameda County Board of Supervisors voted 5–0 to approve the term sheet between the County and the Oakland Athletics providing for the possible purchase by the A's of the county's 50% interest in the Oakland Alameda County Coliseum Complex for $85 million. On September 27, 2019, the Oakland City Council filed a lawsuit against Alameda County over the pending sale of the Coliseum site to the Athletics alleging that the sale violates the .[46] After intervention by Major League Baseball commissioner Rob Manfred threatening to relocate the Athletics,[47] the Oakland City Council officially dropped its lawsuit against Alameda County.[48] As of 2019, then, the Coliseum was owned 50% by the City of Oakland and 50% by the Athletics.[49]

In July 2021, the Oakland City Council asked city staff to pursue negotiations with two Black-led developer groups to purchase their share of the Coliseum, one led by the African American Sports and Entertainment Group and the other by Dave Stewart and Lonnie Murray. Both plans include housing and hotels. The City has indicated any plan would also need the support of the Athletics, who would still own half the site.[50]

Howard Terminal progress[]

On May 13, 2019, the board commissioners of the Port of Oakland voted 7–0 to approve and authorize the Executive Director to execute the initial term sheet for a term of four years.[51] In October 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law two bills intended to streamline the stadium process at the state level.[52]

Ballpark Digest in May 2020 reported that the Howard Terminal ballpark plan "may end up being delayed or even scrapped, as the COVID-19 pandemic and underlying economic uncertainty will certainly impact facility planning for the Athletics."[53] Just prior to this announcement, the Athletics' vice president of communications had stated "the timeline may be adjusted due to the COVID-19 pandemic."[53][54] In July 2020, the East Oakland Stadium Alliance held a protest with "hundreds of cars" on the A's Opening Night to protest the Howard Terminal proposal and the Coliseum sale.[55]

In 2020, the Athletics were sued by the Pacific Merchant Shipping Association, the Harbor Trucking Association, the California Trucking Association, and Schnitzer Steel. Schnitzer Steel has a neighboring facility to Howard Terminal. They alleged that the Athletics were not qualified to be certified under a California law that would expedite any legal challenge against the team over environmental concerns. This was because the team did not meet a Jan. 1, 2020 deadline for consideration. The suit eventually was dismissed by the Alameda County Superior Court. However, the almost year-long suit delayed the process of the team getting the stadium cleared for construction by at least a year.[56]

On May 11, 2021, with the concern of slow progress on the project, Major League Baseball instructed the A's to begin exploring options for relocation from Oakland. That same day, Dave Kaval commented to media that the A's remaining in Oakland was "Howard [Terminal] or bust", implying that the failure to secure approval for the Howard Terminal ballpark project would lead to the A's leaving Oakland.[57]

On July 20, 2021, the Oakland City Council voted 6-1 (with one abstain vote) to approve a non-binding term sheet to continue negotiations with the A's for the new ballpark. However, Dave Kaval said that the team does not agree to those terms since it was not the term sheet the team provided.[58] In spite of this, the A's agreed to resume talks with the City of Oakland to work on a financial deal to build the ballpark.[59]

References[]

  1. ^ "Oakland Ballpark Gondola". Athletics.com. MLB Advanced Media. Retrieved May 16, 2021.
  2. ^ "Frequently Asked Questions". Athletics.com. MLB Advanced Media. Retrieved May 16, 2021.
  3. ^ 1634 to 1699: McCusker, J. J. (1992). How Much Is That in Real Money? A Historical Price Index for Use as a Deflator of Money Values in the Economy ofthe United States: Addenda et Corrigenda (PDF). American Antiquarian Society. 1700-1799: McCusker, J. J. (1992). How much is that in real money?: a historical price index for use as a deflator of money values in the economy of the United States (PDF). American Antiquarian Society. 1800–present: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. "Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–". Retrieved January 1, 2020.
  4. ^ "Oakland Ballpark". www.mlb.com. 2019. Retrieved January 26, 2019.
  5. ^ Platoni, Kara (July 17, 2002). "It's Bottom of the Ninth for Uptown". East Bay Express. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
  6. ^ "Cisco Field - Proposed Home of the 2010 Fremont A's". Sports-venue.info. Archived from the original on April 12, 2012. Retrieved August 11, 2012.
  7. ^ Dickey, Glenn; Writer, Chronicle Staff (August 12, 2005). "A's owner unveils stadium plans". SFGate. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
  8. ^ Gammon, Robert (December 14, 2011). "Coliseum City Unveiled". East Bay Express. Retrieved August 11, 2012.
  9. ^ "Cisco Field". ballparks.com. Retrieved April 25, 2019.
  10. ^ Oakland A's sign Fremont land deal San Francisco Chronicle
  11. ^ "A's, Cisco reach deal to build ballpark in Fremont". ESPN.com. Retrieved April 25, 2019.
  12. ^ Hoge, Patrick; Lagos, Marisa (November 14, 2006). "A's announce plan to buy land, move to Fremont". SFGate. Retrieved April 25, 2019.
  13. ^ "A's abandon plans for Fremont ballpark – Sacramento Business Journal". Bizjournals.com. February 24, 2009. Retrieved August 11, 2012.
  14. ^ "San Jose's Cisco Field". NBC Bay Area. Archived from the original on March 20, 2012. Retrieved August 11, 2012.
  15. ^ "Oakland A's Abandoned Plans To Move To Fremont". www.ktvu.com. February 24, 2009. Archived from the original on September 19, 2012. Retrieved August 11, 2012.
  16. ^ "Diridon Station Area Ballpark". Sjredevelopment.org. Retrieved August 11, 2012.
  17. ^ "Herhold: San Jose council whiffs in allowing town homes near Santana Row – San Jose Mercury News". Mercurynews.com. Retrieved August 11, 2012.
  18. ^ "Home Run Park Factor—A New Approach". Hardballtimes.com. Retrieved August 11, 2012.
  19. ^ Heyman, Jon (May 17, 2012). "Giants still intend to enforce their territorial rights in San Jose and block an A's move". CBS Sports. Retrieved August 11, 2012.
  20. ^ Pavlovic, Alex (February 26, 2014). "Giants willing to share AT&T Park with A's". The Mercury News.
  21. ^ Matier, Phillip; Ross, Andrew (August 4, 2012). "Secret meeting on A's port-ballpark plan". San Francisco Chronicle. sfgate.com. Retrieved August 11, 2012.
  22. ^ Newman, Bruce; Noguchi, Sharon (August 5, 2012). "40 months and counting: Baseball committee -- again -- secretly meets with both San Jose and Oakland". Oakland Tribune. InsideBayArea.com. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved August 11, 2012.
  23. ^ "U.S. Supreme Court rejects San Jose's bid to lure Oakland A's". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved October 5, 2015.
  24. ^ "A's reach 10-year lease deal to stay at Coliseum". USA Today. June 25, 2014. Retrieved June 25, 2014.
  25. ^ Goodell: Levi's might fit Raiders ESPN.com (July 18, 2014)
  26. ^ "A's approach architect about building new ballpark in Oakland". San Francisco Chronicle. August 6, 2014. Retrieved August 11, 2014.
  27. ^ Hickey, John (November 17, 2016). "As Lew Wolff exits, new president Dave Kaval brings optimism". San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved January 29, 2019.
  28. ^ Spedden, Zach (January 10, 2018). "Oakland A's Returning to Three Ballpark Site Options". www.ballparkdigest.com. Retrieved January 31, 2019.
  29. ^ Coliseum, Oracle Arena and Oakland-Alameda County. "Oracle Arena and Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum". www.oraclearena.com. Retrieved October 20, 2018.
  30. ^ "A's appear to favor Peralta site for new stadium". SFChronicle.com. June 19, 2017. Retrieved October 20, 2018.
  31. ^ FOX. "Peralta board of trustees directs chancellor to stop A's stadium planning". KTVU. Retrieved October 20, 2018.
  32. ^ "A's Stadium Plan at Peralta Site Falls Through". NBC Bay Area. Retrieved October 20, 2018.
  33. ^ Keeling, Brock (September 10, 2019), New A's stadium at Oakland's Howard Terminal clears Senate, moves closer to reality, Curbed, retrieved August 14, 2020
  34. ^ San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (October 14, 2019). "Oakland Athletics Ballpark and Mixed-Use Development Project; First Pre-Application Review" (PDF). San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission.gov.
  35. ^ "BIG has been selected to lead design for the new Oakland A's stadium - Archpaper.com". archpaper.com. Retrieved October 20, 2018.
  36. ^ Newcomb, Tim (September 5, 2018). "What To Expect From Oakland's New BIG-Designed Ballpark". www.forbes.com. Retrieved March 1, 2019.
  37. ^ Stevens, Philip (February 27, 2019), Bjarke Ingels Group revises design for the oakland A's new ballpark, Design Boom, retrieved August 14, 2020
  38. ^ Dupin, Chris (July 18, 2019), Calls for Oakland ballpark strikeout, Freight Waves, retrieved August 14, 2020
  39. ^ "Port of Oakland OKs A's wish to study Howard Terminal ballpark". The Mercury News. April 27, 2018. Retrieved October 20, 2018.
  40. ^ "Let's play two: OAKLAND enters ENA with A's for Coliseum property". May 16, 2018. Retrieved October 20, 2018.
  41. ^ Kaval, Dave (January 11, 2019), New ballpark next steps, MLB, retrieved August 14, 2020
  42. ^ "02/22/2019 Release Oakland A's Announce Environmental Justice Partnership with WOEIP". MLB.com. Retrieved June 22, 2019.
  43. ^ Union Pacific voices concern about site of proposed Oakland ballpark, Trains.com, April 17, 2019, retrieved August 14, 2020
  44. ^ "Alameda Labor Council, AFL-CIO Backs Howard Terminal Ballpark for Oakland A's". MLB.com. Retrieved June 22, 2019.
  45. ^ "Mayor Schaaf supports exclusive negotiating deal with Oakland A's on ballpark sites". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved April 2, 2018.
  46. ^ Spedden, Zach (October 1, 2019). "Oakland Sues Alameda County Over Potential Coliseum Land Sale". Ballpark Digest. Retrieved October 15, 2019.
  47. ^ Matier, Phil (October 6, 2019). "The Las Vegas A's? Baseball commissioner tells Oakland it could happen". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved September 10, 2021.
  48. ^ "Judge Dismisses Oakland's Suit Against County Over Coliseum Site". November 14, 2019. Retrieved November 25, 2019.
  49. ^ Ravani, Sarah (December 24, 2019). "Alameda County agrees to sell its share of Oakland Coliseum to A's". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved September 10, 2021.
  50. ^ Ravani, Sarah (September 7, 2021). "Two Black developer groups are competing to redevelop the Oakland Coliseum. Here are their plans". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved September 10, 2021.
  51. ^ "Port of Oakland Board approves term sheet for ballpark plan". Port of Oakland. May 14, 2019. Retrieved June 22, 2019.
  52. ^ Spedden, Zach (October 14, 2019). "Governor's Signature Moves A's Howard Terminal Ballpark Bills Forward". Ballpark Digest. Retrieved October 15, 2019.
  53. ^ Jump up to: a b Reichard, Kevin (May 28, 2020), A's may delay, alter future Oakland ballpark plan, Ballpark Digest, retrieved August 14, 2020
  54. ^ Ostler, Scott (May 28, 2020), For bad-news A's, Howard Terminal ballpark timeline in danger, San Francisco Chronicle, retrieved August 14, 2020
  55. ^ Slusser, Susan (July 24, 2020), Protest opposing ballpark plans set for Coliseum before A's opener, San Francisco Chronicle, retrieved August 14, 2020
  56. ^ "Judge dismisses lawsuit against Oakland A's Howard Terminal project, but opening date has 'obviously slipped'". The Mercury News. February 11, 2021. Retrieved February 11, 2021.
  57. ^ Gallegos, Martin (May 11, 2021). "A's to explore relocation amid stadium push". MLB.com. MLB Advanced Media. Retrieved May 16, 2021.
  58. ^ Axisa, Mike (July 20, 2021). "A's stadium proposal moves forward with City Council vote, but team's future in Oakland remains uncertain". CBS Sports. Retrieved July 21, 2021.
  59. ^ "A's agree to resume talks with Oakland on building a waterfront ballpark, mayor office says". East Bay Times. July 30, 2021. Retrieved July 30, 2021.

External links[]

Events and tenants
Preceded by
Oakland Coliseum 		Home of the
Oakland Athletics
2023 – future 		Succeeded by
none
Retrieved from ""