Opposite ring

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In mathematics, specifically abstract algebra, the opposite of a ring is another ring with the same elements and addition operation, but with the multiplication performed in the reverse order. More explicitly, the opposite of a ring (R, +, ) is the ring (R, +, ∗) whose multiplication ∗ is defined by ab = b a for all a, b in R.[1][2] The opposite ring can be used to define multimodules, a generalization of bimodules. They also help clarify the relationship between left and right modules (see § Properties).

Monoids, groups, rings, and algebras can all be viewed as categories with a single object. The construction of the opposite category generalizes the opposite group, opposite ring, etc.

Examples[]

Free algebra with two generators[]

The free algebra over a field with generators has multiplication from the multiplication of words. For example,

Then the opposite algebra has multiplication given by

which are not equal elements.

Quaternion algebra[]

The quaternion algebra [3] over a field is a division algebra defined by three generators with the relations

, , and

All elements of are of the form

If the multiplication of is denoted , it has the multiplication table

Then the opposite algebra with multiplication denoted has the table

Commutative algebra[]

A commutative algebra is isomorphic to its opposite algebra since for all and in .

Properties[]

  • Two rings R1 and R2 are isomorphic if and only if their corresponding opposite rings are isomorphic.
  • The opposite of the opposite of a ring R is isomorphic to R.
  • A ring and its opposite ring are anti-isomorphic.
  • A ring is commutative if and only if its operation coincides with its opposite operation.[2]
  • The left ideals of a ring are the right ideals of its opposite.[4]
  • The opposite ring of a division ring is a division ring.[5]
  • A left module over a ring is a right module over its opposite, and vice versa.[6]

Citations[]

  1. ^ Berrick & Keating (2000), p. 19
  2. ^ Jump up to: a b Bourbaki 1989, p. 101.
  3. ^ Milne. Class Field Theory. p. 120.
  4. ^ Bourbaki 1989, p. 103.
  5. ^ Bourbaki 1989, p. 114.
  6. ^ Bourbaki 1989, p. 192.

References[]

See also[]

Retrieved from ""