Oven homicide

The oven homicide (Finnish: uunisurma) refers to the homicide of Hilkka Hillevi Saarinen née Pylkkänen (b. 1 November 1927 d. 23 December 1960),^[1] in the village of Krootila in Kokemäki, Finland in December 1960. The case is one of Finland's best known homicides, and the killer has never been officially identified.

Events[]

Hilkka Saarinen was last seen alive in December 1960, aged 33 years. She lived together with her husband Pentti Frans Olavi Saarinen in an old, large wooden house, her childhood home which she had inherited from her grandparents. The couple had taken a bank loan to buy out the other inheritors. Hilkka and Pentti had five children, who due to family trouble and the father's violent tendencies were adopted by the state and placed in foster homes.^[2] According to the children and village neighbours, Pentti was extremely jealous and violent toward Hilkka while under the influence of alcohol, and that he had repeatedly threatened to kill his wife in a way that could not be traced.^[2]

On Christmas Day 1960, Hilkka and Pentti's eldest son arrived to visit his parents' house for the holidays together with his schoolmate, one day earlier than he had previously said. They found the front door unlocked, so crossed the entry room and entered the foyer. At this time, Pentti emerged from the large kitchen to the foyer, locking the door behind him. He blocked the boys' way, wondering aloud at their early arrival. When the son asked where his mother was, Pentti told she had left while he had been sleeping. At the son's suggestion that Hilkka might be in a local house where she had previously worked, Pentti replied "she's never there".^[2]

Later that night, when it was dark, the boys went to fetch more bedclothes from the master bedroom, located behind the kitchen. When the son asked why the kitchen was dark, his father said the lamp was broken. They walked through the kitchen in the narrow streak of light coming from the doorways of the foyer and the master bedroom. However, the boys saw that all the miscellaneous junk that had accumulated on top of the large oven over the years had been thrown over the floor. The father said he had been cleaning up in the dark, even though the master bedroom and the foyer were lit. Also, the knuckles of his one hand had been scraped.

The father had closely followed the boys' movements and acted nervously. Because of this, the schoolmate went home early. The son let the matter be. There was no sign of the mother. The father lived in the house in peace.

As the years passed, the son visited the home every now and then, staying a couple of days at the most. He also observed the house and around it. He inspected the basement at the end of the house, with a ground bottom and stone walls, and the outdoor toilet and its surroundings a short distance apart. He was puzzled by the disappearance of the pile of sand that had previously been in the front yard of the cow barn. As time passed, the boy began to suspect that his mother was no longer alive. After inspecting the surroundings, he began inspecting the building's plank floors, its large attic, and the stone foundation that the building rested upon, aided by a flashlight. Later the boy also tested the seams in the wall with his fingers. At the top of the wall, the seams felt like full, fine and separate pebbles.

In 1966 the son sent a letter to the police: "I suspect that my father knows more about the disappearance of my mother than he has told me. He has clearly opened the oven and shut it again. However, the oven had not been used in seven to eight years before this. My father was cleaning in the dark, even though another room was lit, when I arrived. I think the oven should be dismantled. My father could do anything." The letter was not noted. Later, the son wrote an article in the May 1967 issue of Elämä magazine, titled "Where do they disappear/I suspect my father is a murderer", where he suspected his father of having murdered his mother. Later, when the father and son met, the father said: "Let's just both mind our own business."

It was only in 1972, after new investigators had been ordered to go through old, unsolved cases, that the son was contacted again, because of the letter. He also got to read the interrogation material related to the case. It contained many irrelevant rumours that had been circulating around the village. Small inconsistencies between the stories gave reason to inspect the son's suspicions further.

On Hilkka's nameday, 27 November 1972, 12 years after her disappearance, the Turku district commissar Gunnar Kivelä and his assistant arrived in Kokemäki with a document that authorized them to dismantle the Saarinen family oven. The husband was moved to the police station before the police started to dismantle the oven, finding it filled with sand. In one metre's depth, they found the mummified head of a woman. After digging some more, they found a foot, and finally the entire body. The body was transported to Pori, the regional capital. The next day, the eldest son identified the body as Hilkka Saarinen, his mother.

Trial[]

The case was heard in the local court. In court, the man did not request a defense attorney, but he was given one, because the court felt he could not pursue his own interests and rights by himself. During the whole hearing, the man denied the charges. At one time, he told that Romani people had broken into his house shortly before Christmas 1960, but the theory was immediately rejected. Many witnesses told the court how Hilkka had complained about her husband hitting her, and her injuries, due to which she had repeatedly visited the doctor. This was the best case, in addition to the evidence, that the prosecutor had in aid of him. One piece of evidence that was ignored was the husband's loans from the library: from April to December 1960, he had borrowed 75 crime fiction novels from the library, of which many were about murder, including the murder of one's wife.

The Kokemäki local court decided that the husband had not caused Hilkka Saarinen's death on purpose, and sentenced him to eight years' imprisonment for severe assault. However, the man only served one year of his sentence, because the Turku District Court and the Supreme Court freed him, claiming that neither the cause nor manner of Hilkka Saarinen's death was known, and one could no longer be sentenced for accidental killing after 12 years. Hilkka's husband returned to the house, which had been empty the entire time, and was well on its way to deterioration, and lived there alone until his death on 1 August 1986.

The case has been marked in the police records as an unsolved crime.

Literature[]

• Hannes Markkula: Kuusi suomalaista murhaa. (Gummerus, 1997) ISBN 951-20-5081-1
• Pohjolan poliisi kertoo/Poliisi kertoo 1974 (Pohjolan Poliisin Urheiluliitto). Printed by Elanders Boktryckeri AB 1974 / Kungsbacka, Sweden

References[]