People v. Rizzo

People v. Rizzo, Court of Appeals of New York, 246 N.Y. 334, 158 N.E. 888 (1927), is a criminal case that set precedent for what constitutes an attempt to commit a crime.^[1]

Facts[]

Charles Rizzo, Anthony J. Dorio, Thomas Milo and John Thomasell planned to rob a courier carrying payroll. Rizzo told the others that he could identify the courier. They drove around looking for the courier but they failed to locate the courier before police stopped and arrested them.

Prior History[]

Charles Rizzo was convicted of attempted robbery in the first degree by the Bronx County Court on February 17, 1927.^[2] He appealed to the Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division which affirmed the conviction on June 27, 1927.^[3]

Conclusion[]

Actions must be dangerously close to the commission of a crime to satisfy the action for an attempt. Having failed to find his target, Rizzo could not have completed a substantial step toward commission of robbery to be found guilty of attempting robbery.

References[]

^ Criminal Law - Cases and Materials, 7th ed. 2012, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business; John Kaplan (law professor), Robert Weisberg, , ISBN 978-1-4548-0698-1, [1]
^ New York v. Rizzo, 221 A.D. 353, 223 N.Y.S. 200 (App. Div. 1st Dept. 1927)
^ People v. Rizzo, 246 N.Y. 334, 158 N.E. 888 (1927)

This article relating to case law in the United States, or its constituent jurisdictions is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by .

[CL-1] Criminal Law - Cases and Materials, 7th ed. 2012, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business; John Kaplan (law professor), Robert Weisberg, , ISBN 978-1-4548-0698-1, [1]

[2] New York v. Rizzo, 221 A.D. 353, 223 N.Y.S. 200 (App. Div. 1st Dept. 1927)

[3] People v. Rizzo, 246 N.Y. 334, 158 N.E. 888 (1927)

[1]

[2]

[3]