Rape investigation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rape
Types
Effects and motivations
By country
During conflicts
Laws
Related articles
Portals
Johnny-automatic-scales-of-justice.svg Law portal
  • v
  • t

Rape investigation is the procedure to gather facts about a suspected rape, including forensic identification of a perpetrator, type of rape and other details.

The vast majority of rapes are committed by persons known to the victim: only between five and 15 percent of assaults are perpetrated by a stranger.[1] Therefore, the identity of the perpetrator is frequently reported. Biological evidence such as semen, blood, vaginal secretions, saliva, vaginal epithelial cells may be identified and genetically typed by a crime lab. The information derived from the analysis can often help determine whether sexual contact occurred, provide information regarding the circumstances of the incident, and be compared to reference samples collected from patients and suspects.[2] Medical personnel in many countries collect evidence for potential rape cases by using rape kits. The time it takes to have rape kits processed has been criticized.[3]

Forensic evidence[]

Victim injuries[]

A forensic medical examination is conducted head to toe to record all injuries from minor to severe for the purpose of recovering evidence to support the victim's assertion that a rape took place without consent. Swabbing for bodily fluid samples (saliva, semen, blood) reveals evidence that may identify or eliminate a suspect as well as the nature of the sexual activity that took place.

Toxicology report[]

Establishing the victim's levels of alcohol, prescription or recreational drugs by taking urine and blood samples can support an assertion that there was a lack of capacity to consent to sexual activity.

Passage of time[]

Where an alleged victim of rape comes forward days, weeks, months or even years after an alleged assault took place it is not always appropriate to conduct a physical forensic examination. Such a passing of time degrades any useful physical forensic evidence. Where allegations of rape or childhood sexual abuse are the subject of an investigation which relies on memory as the only evidence, a form of forensic interviewing may be used to assist with the investigation.[4][5]

Documentary evidence[]

Documentary evidence will also be collected during a thorough rape investigation. This type of evidence can include paper records and digital records categorized as either public, judicial or private documents such as:

  • police records
  • court documents
  • business records
  • personal papers (letters, diary, journal)
  • time logs
  • phone records
  • medical records
  • social service records
  • psychiatric records
  • tape recordings
  • video tapes
  • CCTV or surveillance video footage
  • computer records
  • microfiche
  • emails, texts, social media posts, instant messaging records

Perpetrator identification[]

DNA profiling[]

Further information: DNA profiling

DNA profiling is used by crime laboratories for testing biological evidence, most commonly by means of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which allows analysis of samples of limited quality and quantity by making millions of copies. An advanced form of PCR testing called short tandem repeats (STR) generates a DNA profile that can be compared to DNA from a suspect or a crime scene. Blood, buccal (inner cheek) swabbings or saliva should also be collected from victims to distinguish their DNA from that of suspects.[2]

Criminals may plant fake DNA samples at crime scenes. In one case Dr. John Schneeberger, who raped one of his sedated patients and left semen on her underwear, surgically inserted a Penrose drain into his arm and filled it with foreign blood and anticoagulants. Police drew what they believed to be Schneeberger's blood and compared DNA on three occasions without a match.

Police statements[]

Rape investigations are typically initiated by the alleged victim themselves but suspected rape or sexual abuse can also be reported by a third party, investigating police officer or mandated reporter. The alleged victim will give either a written or video-recorded account to police of what they alleged happened. Then the accused perpetrator will subsequently be interviewed by the same investigating police. The recorded police statements will be used as evidence in court if charges are laid and a prosecution results from the investigation.

Contested quality of rape investigations[]

Criticism by sexual violence victim advocates[]

Sexual violence victim advocates have long claimed that police do not take rape victims seriously when they report their alleged assault to police. The crux of the claim is that police all too often rely on outdated and tired rape myths about women putting themselves in situations where they are likely to get raped, or that they lie about being raped to exact revenge. Advocates have for decades campaigned to governments and supreme courts to change laws and set legal precedents in order to facilitate a higher rate of rape charges and criminal convictions. These campaigns have resulted in legal changes across the common-wealth legal systems including broadening the criminal code definition of rape and sexual assault to include acts such as unwanted hugging, kissing or touching, removing the requirement to provide verifiable corroboration that a crime occurred, and changing the statute of limitations to allow more allegations of historical rape or sexual assault to be prosecuted. The campaigning has also led the U.K.'s justice department to issue guidance primarily aimed at police officers in planning and conducting interviews with alleged adult and child sexual violence victims.[6]

Criticism by wrongful conviction advocates[]

Advocates on behalf of those wrongfully convicted of crimes they did not commit, including rape, have long claimed that some police and prosecutors lack professional integrity, fail to conduct thorough investigations and engage in misconduct in order to achieve a conviction, regardless of whether or not the accused may be innocent.[7] There are many documented cases in the U.S.[8] and Canada[9] where this has been proven to be the case for the wrongfully convicted who either maintained their innocence or were coerced into pleading guilty to a crime they did not commit or that did not occur. Most recently in 2018, UK defence lawyers claimed that faith in the fairness of trials was eroded by police and prosecutors playing games in pursuit of convictions by withholding digital evidence that exonerated accused persons, such as mobile phone evidence.[10]

Circumstances and type of rape[]

Abrasions, bruises and lacerations on the victim help elucidate how a rape was carried out. 8 to 45 percent of victims show evidence of external trauma, most commonly at the mouth, throat, wrists, arms, breasts and thighs: trauma to these sites comprise approximately two thirds of injuries, while trauma to the vagina and perineum account for approximately 20 percent.[11]

Recent coitus can be determined by performing a vaginal wet-mount microscopy examination (or oral/anal if indicated) for detection of motile sperm, which are seen on the slide if less than three hours have elapsed since ejaculation. However, only one-third of sexual assaults result in ejaculation into a body orifice.[11] Further, the alleged assailant may have had a vasectomy or have experienced sexual dysfunction (roughly 50 percent of assailants suffer from impotence or ejaculatory dysfunction).[11] In addition, acid phosphatase levels in high concentrations is a good indicator of recent coitus. Acid phosphatase is found in prostatic secretions and activity decreases with time and is usually absent after 24 hours.[11] Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) may be detected within a 48-hour period. The seminal fluid of vasectomized men also contains a significant PSA level. Nonmotile sperm may be detected even beyond 72 hours after intercourse depending on staining techniques.[11]

It was held by the Chhattisgarh High Court [India] as reported in 2006 Volume No. [2] Name of Legal Monthly Publication -Acquittal Page No. 199 – Chhattisgarh High Court – Dilip Rao sahib Deshmukh, J. – Bablu vs State Of Chhattisgarh – 2006 CriLJ 3732 – Decided on 27.7.2006 – Where in a rape case doctor’s found hymen intact, merely because doctors stated that partial penetration was possible, no such inference could be drawn in favor of the prosecution and the conviction in the rape case was set aside by the High Court.

See also[]

References[]

  1. ^ “Most Victims Know Their Attacker.” National Institute of Justice, 1 Oct. 2008. Archive
  2. ^ Jump up to: a b A National Protocol for Sexual Assault Medical Forensic Examinations Archived 2011-07-08 at the Wayback Machine National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). September 2004
  3. ^ (5 January 2015) New hope for rape kit testing advocates BBC News Magazine, Retrieved 5 January 2015
  4. ^ "Forensic Interviewing – Child and Youth Advocacy Centres". Retrieved 2020-06-29.
  5. ^ "The Forensic Experiental Trauma Interview (FETI)". John E. Reid & Associates, Inc.
  6. ^ "A guide to achieving best evidence - a practitioner guide" (PDF). Department of Justice UK. January 2012. Archived from the original on June 29, 2020.
  7. ^ "Center for Prosecutor Integrity – Working to preserve the presumption of innocence, assure equal treatment under law, and bring an end to wrongful convictions". Retrieved 2020-06-29.
  8. ^ "Browse the National Registry of Exonerations". www.law.umich.edu. Retrieved 2020-06-29.
  9. ^ "Wrongful Convictions in Canada - Sex Crimes". Social Theory Watch.
  10. ^ correspondent, Owen Bowcott Legal affairs (2018-02-12). "Justice system at 'breaking point' over digital evidence". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2020-06-29.
  11. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e Emergency Management of the Adult Female Rape Victim. American Family Physician, June, 1991. by Diane K. Beebe[reference is 26-years-old]
Retrieved from ""