Re Conegrade Ltd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Re Conegrade Ltd
Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom.svg
CourtCourt of Appeal of England and Wales
Citation(s)[2002] EWHC 2411 (Ch), [2003] BPIR 358
Keywords
Insolvency, voidable transaction

Re Conegrade Ltd or Saxton v Clarke [2002] EWHC 2411 (Ch) is a UK insolvency law case, concerning voidable transactions.

Facts[]

Conegrade Ltd was a small engineering company. It had four directors, two of which were Mr and Mrs Clarke. Conegrade Ltd had a loan account, which included debts for loans by directors to the company. All board members attended a vote, and voted in favour, of selling a freehold property in Station Road, Uppingham, worth £125,000 to Mr and Mrs Clarke. These two directors would then lease the property back to the company, but they paid only £64,808, which was the balance in the loan account. This settled a debt owed by the company to the Clarkes. Conegrade Ltd was insolvent within a year or so. The liquidators argued the transaction was a preference under IA 1986 section 239.

Judgment[]

Lloyd J held that the only compelling reason for the transfer was the rightly presumed desire to place Mr and Mrs Clarke in a better position, above the creditors.[1]

See also[]

  • UK insolvency law

Notes[]

  1. ^ A Dignam and J Lowry, Company Law (2012) 476

References[]

Retrieved from ""