Representations of classical Lie groups

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In mathematics, the finite-dimensional representations of the complex classical Lie groups , , , , , can be constructed using the general representation theory of semisimple Lie algebras. The groups , , are indeed simple Lie groups, and their finite-dimensional representations coincide[1] with those of their maximal compact subgroups, respectively , , . In the classification of simple Lie algebras, the corresponding algebras are

However, since the complex classical Lie groups are linear groups, their representations are tensor representations. Each irreducible representation is labelled by a Young diagram, which encodes its structure and properties.

General linear group and special linear group[]

Weyl's construction[]

Let be the defining representation of the general linear group . Any irreducible finite-dimensional representation of is a tensor representation, i.e. a subrepresentation of for some integer .

The irreducible subrepresentations of are the images of by Schur functors associated to partitions of into at most integers, i.e. to Young diagrams of size with . (If then .) Schur functors are defined using Young symmetrizers of the symmetric group , which acts naturally on . We write .

The dimensions of the irreducible representations are[1]

where is the hook length of the cell in the Young diagram .

  • The first formula for the dimension is a special case of a formula that gives the characters of representations in terms of Schur polynomials,[1] where are the eigenvalues of .
  • The second formula for the dimension is sometimes called Stanley's hook content formula.[2]

Examples[]

Irreducible representation of Dimension Young diagram
Trivial representation
Determinant representation
Defining representation
Adjoint representation
Symmetric representation
Antisymmetric representation

Case of the special linear group[]

Two representations of are equivalent as representations of the special linear group if and only if there is such that .[1] In particular, the determinant representation is trivial in , i.e. it is equivalent to .

Tensor products[]

Tensor products of finite-dimensional representations of are[1]

where the natural integers are Littlewood-Richardson coefficients. For example,

Orthogonal group and special orthogonal group[]

In addition to the Lie group representations described here, the orthogonal group and special orthogonal group have spin representations, which are projective representations of these groups, i.e. representations of their universal covering groups.

Construction of representations[]

Since is a subgroup of , any irreducible representation of is also a representation of , which may however not be irreducible. In order for a tensor representation of to be irreducible, the tensors must be traceless.[3]

Irreducible representations of are parametrized by a subset of the Young diagrams associated to irreducible representations of : the diagrams such that the sum of the lengths of the first two columns is a most .[3] The irreducible representation that corresponds to such a diagram is a subrepresentation of the corresponding representation . For example, in the case of symmetric tensors,[1]

Case of the special orthogonal group[]

The antisymmetric tensor is a one-dimensional representation of , which is trivial for . Then where is obtained from by acting on the length of the first column as .

  • For odd, the irreducible representations of are parametrized by Young diagrams with rows.
  • For even, is still irreducible as an representation if , but it reduces to a sum of two inequivalent representations if .[3]

For example, the irreducible representations of correspond to Young diagrams of the types . The irreducible representations of correspond to , and . On the other hand, the dimensions of the spin representations of are even integers.[1]

Dimensions[]

The dimensions of irreducible representations of are given by a formula that depends on the parity of :[4]

There is also an expression as a factorized polynomial in :[4]

where are respectively row lengths, column lengths and hook lengths. In particular, antisymmetric representations have the same dimensions as their counterparts, , but symmetric representations do not,

Tensor products[]

In the stable range , the tensor product multiplicities that appear in the tensor product decomposition are Newell-Littlewood numbers, which do not depend on .[5] Beyond the stable range, the tensor product multiplicities become -dependent modifications of the Newell-Littlewood numbers.[6][5][7]

Symplectic group[]

Representations[]

The finite-dimensional irreducible representations of the symplectic group are parametrized by Young diagrams with at most rows. The dimension of the corresponding representation is[3]

There is also an expression as a factorized polynomial in :[4]

Tensor products[]

Just like in the case of the orthogonal group, tensor product multiplicities are given by Newell-Littlewood numbers in the stable range, and modifications thereof beyond the stable range.

External links[]

References[]

  1. ^ a b c d e f g William Fulton; Joe Harris (2004). "Representation Theory". Graduate Texts in Mathematics. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0979-9. ISSN 0072-5285. Wikidata Q55865630.
  2. ^ Hawkes, Graham (2013-10-19). "An Elementary Proof of the Hook Content Formula". arXiv:1310.5919v2 [math.CO].
  3. ^ a b c d Hamermesh, Morton (1989). Group theory and its application to physical problems. New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-66181-4. OCLC 20218471.
  4. ^ a b c N El Samra; R C King (December 1979). "Dimensions of irreducible representations of the classical Lie groups". Journal of Physics A. 12 (12): 2317–2328. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/12/12/010. ISSN 1751-8113. Wikidata Q104601301.
  5. ^ a b Gao, Shiliang; Orelowitz, Gidon; Yong, Alexander (2021). "Newell-Littlewood numbers". Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 374 (9): 6331–6366. arXiv:2005.09012v1. doi:10.1090/tran/8375. S2CID 218684561.
  6. ^ Steven Sam (2010-01-18). "Littlewood-Richardson coefficients for classical groups". Concrete Nonsense. Archived from the original on 2019-06-18. Retrieved 2021-01-05.
  7. ^ Kazuhiko Koike; Itaru Terada (May 1987). "Young-diagrammatic methods for the representation theory of the classical groups of type Bn, Cn, Dn". Journal of Algebra. 107 (2): 466–511. doi:10.1016/0021-8693(87)90099-8. ISSN 0021-8693. Wikidata Q56443390.
Retrieved from ""