Roads and Transit

This article has multiple issues. Please help or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article's factual accuracy may be compromised due to out-of-date information. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (November 2010) This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources:  –  ·  ·  · scholar · JSTOR (March 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (March 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Roads and Transit was a ballot measure in the U.S. State of Washington concerning transportation, that was sent to voters in the Snohomish, King, and Pierce Counties for approval on November 6, 2007. It was defeated by a margin of 56% to 44%.^[1]

In 2006, the Washington State Legislature required Sound Transit and the Regional Transportation Investment District or RTID planning committee to jointly submit to voters a transportation financing plan in the 2007 general election. RTID and Sound Transit began working together on the Roads and Transit plan in June 2006. Along with regional planning and transportation agencies, they conducted years of engineering and design work. They also informed the public and collected public comments through open houses, surveys, letters, meetings and hearings.

Provisions[]

Roads and Transit proposed to expand mass transit and improve roads in the most heavily traveled corridors in Snohomish, King and Pierce counties. It is a unified program of investments in highways, light- and commuter-rail, HOV lanes, park-and-ride lots, and express and local bus service.

Sound Transit and RTID combined two plans in order to create a comprehensive, balanced package.

Sound Transit's portion, ST2, was intended to extend the Puget Sound region’s light-rail system to 70 miles (110 km), create thousands of new Park and Ride slots, and expand bus and commuter-rail service. It was projected to cost approximately $24 billion over twenty years, to be financed by extending a regional sales tax of 0.4% and adding an extra 0.5% sales tax.

RTID's portion, Blueprint for Progress, would have invested in state highways, bridges, and local roads in Snohomish, King, and Pierce counties in order to ease choke-points and improve safety. Increasing sales tax by 0.1% and the motor vehicle excise tax by 0.8% was projected to fund the package's twenty-year cost of $14 billion.

Participants[]

Supporters[]

Plan supporters argued that the package provides a balanced and comprehensive approach to solving the traffic problem in the Puget Sound region.^[2]

The plan provided commuters with travel options. For instance, it would have extended the region's light rail system to 70 miles (110 km), which helps lift commuters out of congestion and make the environment cleaner. Additionally, nearly 12,000 park and rides slot will be created. Supporters concerned with the safety of roads endorsed the Roads and Transit proposal, because it replaces and retrofits overpasses and bridges vulnerable to earthquakes. Moreover, by reducing congestion, first responders and emergency services would be able to move more quickly on roads. By reducing congestion, Roads and Transit planned to help the Puget Sound region's economy, allowing people and goods to move more quickly and reliably. Improving freight mobility would help the region compete in an expanding global economy.

Endorsers[]

Organizations that endorsed the 'Yes' on Roads and Transit proposal include:

• Washington Conservation Voters
• Washington State Labor Council
• City of Bellevue
• Futurewise.org
• American Council of Engineering Companies – Washington
• Downtown Seattle Association
• Puget Sound Energy
• Washington Association of Realtors
• City of Edmonds

Opponents[]

King County Executive, Ron Sims, was the most well-known opponent of the plan. In a September 19, 2007 Seattle Times op-ed, he stated that the plan did too little to deal with the problem of global warming and relied too heavily on rail.

Kemper F. Freeman was chairman and chief executive officer of the Kemper Development Company, which owned and operated Bellevue Square. Freeman was also chairman of the First Mutual Bank and had served as the director of First Mutual Bancshares since 1968.

The Cascade Chapter of the Sierra Club also declared its opposition due to concerns around the impact of road expansion on global warming.

Phil Talmadge was a Seattle attorney who had previously served on the Supreme Court and the State Legislature.

Eastside Rail Now also opposed the plan in connection with its advocacy of converting BNSF's Woodinville Subdivision rail lines into the core of a regional commuter rail system.

References[]

External links[]

• Background Information on the Roads and Transit Proposal
• RTID homepage
• ST2 homepage
• Content of ST2 plan
• Yes on Roads and Transit homepage