Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction is a continued fraction discovered by Rogers (1894) and independently by Srinivasa Ramanujan, and closely related to the Rogers–Ramanujan identities. It can be evaluated explicitly for a broad class of values of its argument.

Domain coloring representation of the convergent of the function , where is the Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction.

Definition[]

Representation of the approximation of the Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction.

Given the functions and appearing in the Rogers–Ramanujan identities,

and,

OEISA003114 and OEISA003106, respectively, where denotes the infinite q-Pochhammer symbol, j is the j-function, and 2F1 is the hypergeometric function, then the Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction is,

denotes the Jacobi symbol.

Modular functions[]

If , then and , as well as their quotient , are modular functions of . Since they have integral coefficients, the theory of complex multiplication implies that their values for an imaginary quadratic irrational are algebraic numbers that can be evaluated explicitly.

Examples[]



where is the golden ratio.

Relation to modular forms[]

can be related to the Dedekind eta function, a modular form of weight 1/2, as,[1]

Therefore the Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction can be expressed in terms of Jacobi theta function this way:


Definition of the nome function:

The small letter k describes the elliptic modulus and the big letter K describes the complete elliptic integral of the first kind.

The continued fraction is related to the Jacobi elliptic functions as follows:

with

Relation to j-function[]

One formula involving the j-function and the Dedekind eta function is this:

where

Eliminating the eta quotient , one can then express j(τ) in terms of as,

where the numerator and denominator are polynomial invariants of the icosahedron. Using the modular equation between and , one finds that,

let , then

where

which in fact is the j-invariant of the elliptic curve,

parameterized by the non-cusp points of the modular curve .

Functional equation[]

For convenience, one can also use the notation when q = e2πiτ. While other modular functions like the j-invariant satisfies,

and the Dedekind eta function has,

the functional equation of the Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction involves[2] the golden ratio ,

Incidentally,

Modular equations[]

There are modular equations between and . Elegant ones for small prime n are as follows.[3]

For , let and , then


For , let and , then


For , let and , then


For , let and , then


Regarding , note that


Derivatives[]

For , the first order derivative of given in terms of the Euler function is [4]

Setting , where , the function is related with the Dedekind eta function

Ramanujan has stated that, for real , with , we have [5]

By taking the logarithmic derivative of the above relation and applying analytic continuation we get

with validity to all complex with .

Evaluations[]

Assume , and is the root of the equation , (here is the elliptic singular modulus associated with the nome (mathematics) and is the complete elliptic integral of the first kind also see [6],[7],[8]). Then if

we get [9]

where is root of

Also

Examples of evaluations of and , can be found in tables in the literature. For instance, if we set , then , , and [8] pg.334: , [8] pg.331: , where is the Euler gamma function.

Other results[]

Ramanujan found many other interesting results regarding .[10] Let , , , and as the golden ratio.

If , then
If , then

The powers of also can be expressed in unusual ways. For its cube,

where,

For its fifth power, let , then,

Quintic equations[]

The general quintic equation in Bring-Jerrard Form can be solved in terms of Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction. For every real value a > 1 this equation can be solved with the function R(q) and the elliptic nome q(k):

To solve this equation, the elliptic modulus must be determined according to the following pattern:

Then this is the real solution of this quintic equation:

For example, the following equation has the following real solution:

This constant is roughly 1.1673 and it can not be represented by elementary root expressions.

References[]

  1. ^ Duke, W. "Continued Fractions and Modular Functions", https://www.math.ucla.edu/~wdduke/preprints/bams4.pdf
  2. ^ Duke, W. "Continued Fractions and Modular Functions" (p.9)
  3. ^ Berndt, B. et al. "The Rogers–Ramanujan Continued Fraction", http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~berndt/articles/rrcf.pdf
  4. ^ N.Bagis, L.Glasser. (2009). "Integrals related with Rogers Ramanujan continued fraction and q-products". arXiv:0904.1641. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0904/0904.1641.pdf
  5. ^ G.Andrews. (1979). Amer. Math. Monthly.Vol 86. pg 89-108.
  6. ^ J.M. Borwein and P.B. Borwein. (1987). "Pi and the AGM: A Study in Analytic Number Theory and Computational Complexity", Wiley, New York.
  7. ^ D. Broadhurst. (2008). 'Solutions by Radicals at Singular Values from New Class Invariants for '. arXiv:0807.2976 (math-phy).
  8. ^ J.M. Borwein, M.L. Glasser, R.C. McPhedran, J.G. Wan, I.J. Zucker. (2013). 'Lattice Sums Then and Now'. Cambridge University Press. New York.
  9. ^ Nikos Bagis. (2014)."The complete evaluation of Rogers-Ramanujan and other continued fractions with elliptic functions". arXiv:1008.1304v2[math.GM] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1008.1304.pdf
  10. ^ Berndt, B. et al. "The Rogers–Ramanujan Continued Fraction"
  • Rogers, L. J. (1894), "Second Memoir on the Expansion of certain Infinite Products", Proc. London Math. Soc., s1-25 (1): 318–343, doi:10.1112/plms/s1-25.1.318
  • Berndt, B. C.; Chan, H. H.; Huang, S. S.; Kang, S. Y.; Sohn, J.; Son, S. H. (1999), "The Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction" (PDF), Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 105 (1–2): 9–24, doi:10.1016/S0377-0427(99)00033-3

External links[]

Retrieved from ""