Rubus plicatus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rubus plicatus
Rubus plicatus fruit kz1.jpg
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
(unranked):
Angiosperms
(unranked):
(unranked):
Order:
Family:
Genus:
Subgenus:
Rubus
Species:
R. plicatus
Binomial name
Rubus plicatus
Weihe & Nees
Synonyms[1]
  • Rubus aestivalis E.H.L.Krause
  • Rubus affinis Weihe & Nees, p.p.676
  • Rubus avellanifolius Köhler ex Weihe
  • Rubus corylifolius Hayne
  • Rubus ernestibolli E.H.L.Krause
  • Rubus exaltatus Dumort.
  • Rubus fruticosus L. sens.str.
  • Rubus holmiensis Gand.
  • Rubus longipetiolatus Hülsen
  • Rubus polymorphus K.F.Schimp. & Spenn.
  • Rubus rosulentus P.J.Müll.
  • Rubus spicifolius Boulay
  • Rubus teutobergensis G.H.Loos

Rubus plicatus is a species of blackberry native to Europe.[2]

Taxonomy[]

The type specimen of the genus Rubus was selected from among Linnaeus's specimens by Nathaniel Lord Britton and Addison Brown in 1913 as a herbarium specimen labelled Rubus fruticosus. This specimen turned out to include a mixture of pieces that apparently belong to Rubus plicatus and Rubus ulmifolius. From these, a component that appears to match Rubus plicatus was selected to be the type.[3] The type of Rubus plicatus, however, is a different specimen (which permits an individual botanist to decide that R. plicatus and R. fruticosus are not the same species). Whenever R. fruticosus and R. plicatus are considered to belong to the same species, the name Rubus fruticosus has priority. When one must be listed as a synonym of the other, R. fruticosus is usually considered to be a synonym of the later name Rubus plicatus,[1][2] although strictly speaking that choice is contrary to the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants.

References[]

  1. ^ a b "The Plant List: A Working List of All Plant Species". Retrieved 12 December 2014.
  2. ^ a b "Rubus plicatus". Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Agricultural Research Service (ARS), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Retrieved 12 December 2014.
  3. ^ McNeill, J.; Odell, E.A.; Consaul, L.L.; Katz, D.S. (1987). "American Code and Later Lectotypifications of Linnaean Generic Names Dating from 1753: A Case Study of Discrepancies". Taxon. 36 (2): 350–401. doi:10.2307/1221430. JSTOR 1221430.

External links[]


Retrieved from ""