Self-authorship

This article is an orphan, as no other articles . Please introduce links to this page from ; try the Find link tool for suggestions. (January 2021)

Self-authorship is defined by Robert Kegan as an "ideology, an internal personal identity, that can coordinate, integrate, act upon, or invent values, beliefs, convictions, generalizations, ideals, abstractions, interpersonal loyalties, and intrapersonal states. It is no longer authored by them, it authors them and thereby achieves a personal authority."^[1]

Self-authorship is only a single phase of development within the lifelong process of self-evolution. Instead of depending on external values, beliefs, and interpersonal loyalties, self-authorship relies on internal generation and coordination of one's beliefs, values and internal loyalties.^[2]

Self-authorship spans over three dimensions: cognitive, intrapersonal, and interpersonal. It is based on theory involving adult learning and gaining of knowledge with the product of self-authorship including learning and growth. The concept of the "object" and the concept of the "self" make up self-authorship. One is not born with self-authorship. There are steps to attain self-authorship which include following external formulas, then crossroads and eventually obtaining self-authorship. There are elements of self-authorship that include trusting the internal voice, building an internal foundation and securing internal commitments.

Not every experience allows us to work towards self-authorship. Developmentally effective experiences are what help guide us to self-authorship. These experiences allow for others to look at the world around them and search deep within themselves in order to develop their own opinions. These influences and internal searching allows the individual to understand what their opinions are, why they have those opinions and how that opinion was formulated. In addition, these experiences allow for the person to rely on one's internal beliefs in order to make decisions.

Cultural factors play a role in the development of self-authorship. For African Americans, identity dissonance in relational dissonance are catalysts in the development of self-authorship. However, for white Americans, only identity dissonance is a catalyst in the development of self-authorship.^{[citation needed]}

Leading Theorists of Self-Authorship[]

Robert Kegan

Robert Kegan’s work was inspired by Jean Piaget's "Theory of Cognitive Development". Kegan identified that Piaget’s research did not include the emotion of an individual's personal development.

To address this gap, Kegan conducted research that informed his 1994 theory of the “Evolution of Consciousness”.^[3] Kegan named five progressions that a person would move through when transitioning from stable environments to unstable environments. Each unstable environment has the ability to progress the individual from one stage to the next.

Kegan identified each progression, using three different titles throughout his research. The most recent naming convention is “Forms of Mind” (2000) . The Forms of Mind follow this order:

Order 0: Newborn - 18 months old. Infants live in an object-less world, until they begin to recognize their surroundings.

Order 1: Occurs at approximate two years old when the child understands that they can control their body's reflexes.

Order 2: Instrumental Mind. The individual has the ability to think in a more organized way.

Order 3: Socialized Mind. Ability to understand how they process emotion and become committed to the people and guiding beliefs that make up their community.

Order 4: Self-Authoring Mind. Individual has the ability to self-regulate and looks for relationships that benefit themselves and others. These relationships become important as the individual looks to their relationships as a way to continually develop.

Order 5: Self-Transforming Mind. When conducting research, Kegan found that many adults did not reach this stage and those who did, did not reach Order 5 until the age of 40 years old.^[3]

Marcia Baxter Magolda

Self-authorship, as defined by Marcia Baxter Magolda's research focused on the epistemological development of college students to identify six guiding assumptions informing her development model. As one continues to distance themselves from depending on external authorities for beliefs, identities and social relationships, self authorship begins to evolve. There are four stages that guide the progression to self-authorship:

Stage One: Following External Formulas

Those in this stage rely on external formulas for what one believes, how to construct one's identity and how to guide social relationships.

Stage Two: Crossroads

This is a transitional period. In this period, one is in between relying on external formulas and achieving self-authorship. The conflict people in this stage are experiencing is between the values they develop that are integral to the sense of self and the demands they experience in their roles and relationships with others.

Stage Three: Self-Authorship

Robert Kegan first named self-authorship, as the individuals "shift of meaning-making capacity from outside the self to inside the self".^[4] Stage three, is the pinnacle of the evolution of self-authorship. In this stage, one is able to be unique and express their internal authority. One has strength to stand apart from the mainstream. One's responsibility lies in interpreting experiences based trusting one's internal voices, not on other's values and ideas.

Stage Four: Personal Foundation

In this stage individuals are grounded in who they are. The meaning they place on their relationship with themselves and with others which informs their belief systems.

Three dimensions of self-authorship[]

Self-authorship consists of three dimensions: cognitive, intrapersonal, and interpersonal. “Self-authored people employ complex cognitive processes of meaning-making in ways that recognize the socially constructed nature of knowledge (cognitive) while also keeping in mind their own beliefs, values, and goals (intrapersonal),” as well as those of others (interpersonal).^[5] Cognitive self-authorship focuses on the idea that the individual is responsible for their thoughts and beliefs rather than being influenced by external sources. As a result, learning becomes more open-ended and knowledge is seen as more contextual, rather than absolute. Interpersonal self-authoring revolves around how the individual views their relationships with others. A self-authoring mind is one that has relationships, but whose thoughts and behaviors are based on the individual’s beliefs rather than the beliefs of those with whom they associate. Intrapersonal self-authoring centers on the core values and beliefs that the individual possesses. Self-authorship encourages development of beliefs based on one’s own choices rather than simply imitating the beliefs/values of those around them. These original beliefs then serve as the foundation and standard to which the individual’s thoughts and actions are held.

Theoretical assumptions[]

Self-authorship is grounded in two assumptions about adult learning and knowledge. The first assumption states people create knowledge by interpreting their personal experiences through what is known as constructivism. This focuses on the meaning that is made of the experience from an individual perspective. The second assumption is that self-authorship has an underlying structure that is developmental in nature. In other words, as one continues to mature, his or her self-authorship also continues to develop. How one organizes and identifies with his or her experiences continues to change.^[2]

Although many may think the products of continuous changes in self-authorship are an accumulation of knowledge, skills and information, this is not the case. The true products of continuous changes in self-authorship are learning and growth.

Relationships involved in self authorship[]

Kegan developed a theory that is built on Piaget's stages of development. While Piaget's stages end at age 11, Kegan created a theory that continues into adulthood. His theory is known as the Subject-Object Theory. The relationship between "subject" and "object" are what make up self-authorship. Subject refers to the elements of organizing that one identifies with. It is inseparable from the self and the individual may be unaware of the behavior that is developed due to what they are subject to.^[6] Object refers to the information that gets organized. They are the elements that one can reflect on for future reference and accept responsibility for.

When going through the subject-object transitions, the structure of the meaning-making or the self-authorship becomes more complex.^[2] Change in this relationship demonstrates the positive developments that occur as an individual learns to take more responsibility. It allows for tolerance of difference and openness with less rigidity.^[6] Although this transformation is for the improvement of an individual as new capacities are discovered, it is normal to feel a sense of being lost and anxious as they transition. While there is more to gain, there is still a valuable part of the self that was given up.^[7]

Evolution of self-authorship[]

Self-authorship, as defined by Marcia Baxter Magolda's research, focused on the epistemological development of college students. Her research led to identify six guiding assumptions informing her development model. As one continues to distance themselves from depending on external authorities for beliefs, identities and social relationships, self-authorship begins to evolve. There are four stages that guide the progression to self-authorship.^[2]

Stage One: Following External Formulas

Those in this stage rely on external formulas for what one believes, how to construct one's identity and how to guide social relationships. Those in this stage tend to strive to meet expectations in their social roles and seek approval. They often learn from their societal expectations, peers and other adults.

Stage Two: Crossroads

This is a transitional period. In this period, one is in between relying on external formulas and achieving self-authorship. They recognize the need to establish themselves in their identity, social roles and relationships.^[8] The conflict people in this stage are experiencing is between the values he or she is developing that are integral to the sense of self and the demands he or she experiences in the roles and relationships with others.

Stage Three: Self-Authorship

This is the pinnacle of the evolution of self-authorship. In this stage, one is able to be unique and express his or her internal authority. One has the strength to stand apart from the mainstream. One's responsibility lies in interpreting experiences based not on other's values and ideas but trusting one's internal voices. Not only have they established their own beliefs, but they are able to defend and live them. The more self reflection the individual may give in this stage, the clearer the self-concept.

Stage Four: Personal Foundation

In this stage, individuals are grounded in who they are and the meaning they place on their relationship with themselves and with others informs their belief systems. They make life decisions based on this belief system and it becomes solidified.^[9] In this stage, they may enter feelings of peace and contentment.

Three Elements of Self Authorship[]

Following a 21 year study, Marcia Baxter Magolda designed the three elements of self-authorship by studying constructivist interviews. She dissected the narratives of young adults in the age range of 18 years old to 39 years old.^[4]

Trusting the Internal Voice

By trusting the internal voice, the individual better understands their reality and their reaction to their reality. By using internal voice as a way to shape reactions to external events, confidence in using personal beliefs and values magnifies their "ability to take ownership of how they ma[k]e meaning of external events".^[4]

Building an Internal Foundation

The individual consciously works to create an internal foundation to guide reactions to reality.^[4] One does this by combining one's identity, relationships, beliefs and values into a set of internal commitments from which to act upon.

Securing Internal Commitments

Baxter Magolda described this shift as a "crossing over",^[4] where the individuals core beliefs become a "personal authority",^[4] which they act upon.

Developmentally effective experiences for providing self-authorship[]

Not every experience is an effective experience for providing self-authorship. However, there are experiences that do help to provide self-authorship. One experience involves increasing awareness, understanding and openness to diversity. This allows for one to become more open and understanding of differences and see how one's own background affects how one identifies socially.^[10]

Another experience involves exploring and establishing a basis for beliefs, choices and actions. This allows for one to think for one's self and to stand up for one's beliefs and challenge those that do not have the same beliefs.^[10]

An additional experience involves one developing a sense of identity to guide choices. In this experience, one learns from other's mistakes or challenges and evaluates one's own choices and behaviors. From this, one makes deliberate decisions about how to live one's life.^[10]

The last experience involves increasing awareness of openness to responsibility for one's own learning. During this experience, one learns to take responsibility for their own learning and they begin to understand how learning new things influences life and identity.^[10]

Leading factors in development of self-authorship in diverse cultures[]

According to Jane Pizzolato et al 2012: cultural, relational, and psychological interactions affect self-authorship development.^[11] This is true, especially for African Americans. In a study of diverse college students from three public universities, they found that psychological contexts seem to be related to students' dissonance experiences and the process of self-authorship. Specifically, they found the primary catalyst of self-authorship to be the students' previous notions of identity dissonance when asked, "Who am I?". However, for African Americans, the question was less about, "Who Am I?" in the intrapersonal dimension of self-authorship but, "Who are we?" referencing the minority or ethnic group. The "Who are we?" question shows that previous notions of relational dissonance also lead to self-authorship development. This seemed to be more relevant for African Americans and other minority groups.^[12]

References[]