State v. Strasburg

State v. Strasburg
State v. Strasburg
Court	Washington Supreme Court
Full case name	The State of Washington v. Martin Strasburg
Decided	September 10, 1910
Citation(s)	110 P. 1020, 60 Wash. 106, 1910 Wash. LEXIS 1016
Case history
Appealed from	of King County
Court membership
Judges sitting	Rudkin, Chadwick, Crow, , , , Mount, Parker
Case opinions
Majority	Parker, joined by Crow and Mount
Concurrence	Rudkin, joined by Gose and Chadwick; Dunbar joined in part
Concur/dissent	Morris
Dissent	Fullerton
Keywords
	Insanity defense; Right to jury trial; Due process; Legislation;

State v. Strasburg, 110 P. 1020 (Wash. 1910), was a case decided by the Washington Supreme Court that held that a statute eliminating the insanity defense was unconstitutional. The court likened the exclusion of evidence of insanity to a denial of trial by jury.^[1]

Martin Strasburg, described as "an unknown and penniless stranger", was convicted of assault after shooting Otto Peeck in a saloon in Seattle. Lawyers saw the Strasburg case as an opportunity to have the Washington law that forbade insanity defenses declared unconstitutional.^[2] The effect of the Supreme Court declaring the law unconstitutional was said to be expected to reverse the convictions of "scores" of people.^[3]

References[]

^ Bonnie, R.J. et al. Criminal Law, Second Edition. Foundation Press, New York: 2004, p. 623
^ "May Knock Out Insanity Law". Tacoma Times. 7 (141). UPI. June 2, 1910. p. 8. Retrieved 8 January 2016 – via Newspapers.com.
^ "Holds Insanity May Be Defense in Criminal Case". Oregon Daily Journal. 9 (163). UPI. September 12, 1910. p. 1. Retrieved 8 January 2016 – via Newspapers.com.

External links[]

"State v. Strasburg". Pacific Reporter. 110: 1020. Retrieved 8 January 2016 – via Google Books.

[1] Bonnie, R.J. et al. Criminal Law, Second Edition. Foundation Press, New York: 2004, p. 623

[2] "May Knock Out Insanity Law". Tacoma Times. 7 (141). UPI. June 2, 1910. p. 8. Retrieved 8 January 2016 – via Newspapers.com.

[3] "Holds Insanity May Be Defense in Criminal Case". Oregon Daily Journal. 9 (163). UPI. September 12, 1910. p. 1. Retrieved 8 January 2016 – via Newspapers.com.

[1]

[2]

[3]