Taphrina caerulescens

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Taphrina caerulescens
Taphrina caerulescens.JPG
Symptomatic blisters of Taphrina caerulescens on oak
Scientific classification edit
Kingdom: Fungi
Division: Ascomycota
Class: Taphrinomycetes
Order: Taphrinales
Family: Taphrinaceae
Genus: Taphrina
Species:
T. caerulescens
Binomial name
Taphrina caerulescens
(Desm. & Mont.) Tul. (1866)
Synonyms[1]

Ascomyces caerulescens Desm. & Mont. (1848)

Taphrina caerulescens is a species of fungus in the family Taphrinaceae. It is a pathogenic Ascomycete fungus that causes oak leaf blister disease on various species of oak trees (Quercus spp.). The associated anamorph species is Lalaria coccinea, described in 1990.[2] This disease causes lesions and blisters on Oak leaves. Effects of the disease are mostly cosmetic. Although not taxonomically defined, strains of T. caerulescens have been shown to be host specific with varying ¬ascus morphology between strains.[3] There are differences in strains’ abilities to metabolize various carbon and nitrogen compounds. This has been proposed as a method of taxonomically defining subspecies within T. caerulescens.[4][5]

Taphrina caerulescens is very closely related to Taphrina deformans, which causes peach leaf curl. These two pathogens have indistinguishable asci. However, T. deformans infects peach tree species while T. caerulescens infects Oak tree species only.

Hosts and symptoms[]

Taphrina caerulescens infects about 50 different species of oak (Quercus), predominately red oak (Q. erythrobalanus) and some white oak (Q. leurobalanus). Oak leaf blister is found across the country and in varying parts of the world but is most severe in the southeast and Gulf States of the U.S.[6] It is generally accepted that a T. caerulescens strain isolated from one host cannot be used to infect a different host species. This indicates that there are a number of different strains within T. caerulescens. For instance, it has been observed where a single, heavily infected oak tree of one species is surrounded by various other susceptible oak species which remain symptom-less of oak leaf blister the entire season. In a study by Taylor & Birdwell, pathogen isolates from water, live, and southern red oak were used to inoculate the host live oak. Asci developed on the live oak only from pathogen isolates originating from the live oak, further indicating host specificity. The extent of strains' host specificity is not fully known and no taxonomic specifications are in place to name these strains.[7] Various strains have also been shown to differ in their nitrogen and carbon compound metabolic profiles [4][5]

Symptoms[]

In the lab, symptoms develop about four weeks after inoculation [8] In the field, symptoms are most prominent on the top side of the leaf. Grey lesions 3–20 mm [6] in diameter appear in early spring on the bottom side of the leaf with blisters or bulges up to ½” high on the top side of the leaf.[7][9] By midsummer these lesions may coalesce causing significant amounts of necrosis per leaf. This can cause the leaf to curl as well as premature defoliation (more common where disease is more severe) upwards of 85%.[6][10] Top side chlorosis normally corresponds with the lesions on the bottom side of the leaf.[11] Reduced overall growth of the tree may result, but is not common.

Microscopic symptoms[]

Blisters of Taphrina caerulescens seen on underside of oak leaf

Cells around the blisters resemble meristematic cells with denser cytoplasms and smaller vacuoles.[8] Mycelial development is sparse on the leaf surface. Hyphae growth is subcuticle and intercellular in the epidermal layer. There is no evidence of hyphae growing into the mesophyll layer nor into epidermal and cuticle layers beyond the lesions whereas T. Deformans does cross into the mesophyll layer.[7][8] Lower epidermal cells in diseased tissue are elongated. Anticlinal divisions are likely while periclinal and oblique divisions are definitive. There are no observable effects on guard cells. Cells in the mesophyll layer remain mostly unchanged; there is a slight reduction [chloroplast] number in palisade cells. Occasional degenerate chloroplasts and slightly lower number in mesophyll cells.

The upper epidermal cells appear to remain relatively normal as well, as hyphal growth goes below this layer. Healthy epidermal cells contain a large central vacuole surrounded by a thin cytoplasmic layer with endoplasmic reticulum, chloroplasts with well-developed grana, starch granules, and osmophilic globules. Other organelles are infrequently present as well. Epidermal cells of diseased tissue have highly irregular cell walls. The most dramatic changes were within the cell. The large central vacuole is replaced with a number of small irregularly shaped vacuoles containing a highly electron dense material. Nuclei are enlarged, plus a 2-3 fold increase in the number of organelles normally present in these cell types. Chloroplasts become large and irregular with large starch granules inside of them as well as other internal alterations to the chloroplasts. These alterations indicate intense metabolic activity, appearing to dedifferentiate and resemble meristematic cells.[12] Symptoms typically occur in early summer.[9] Concave depressions with asci in them on the top and bottom of leaves suggests direct penetration.[7]

Disease cycle[]

Taphrina caerulescens

Taphrina caerulescens is an ascomycete fungi. T. caerulescens, as is true for all species of Taphrina, has distinct parasitic and saprophytic stages. The two stages have varying morphologies. Saprophytic somatic cells overwinter in bark crevasses [13] and bud scales. In early spring these spores infect young leaves as they first emerge. Infection triggers hyperplasia and hypertrophy, likely due to the production and excretion of a hormones called cytokines[8] produced by Taphrina species, and other symptoms as described above. Taphrina species have been shown to produce cytokinin.[8] A layer of asci emerge within the lesions on the bottom of the leaf. Ascus initials are found among mature asci. The asci initials are cytoplasmic containing lipid droplets and glycogen granules.[8] Mature asci develop from the initials by nuclear fusion followed by mitosis. These asci sit naked on the leaf surface with no ascocarp. These mature asci are long single cells, unitruncate, and contain ascospores. With no special mechanism, ascospores are all forcibly discharged from the ascus to sit on the leaf surface.

Blastospores and conidia bud directly, with a noticeable constriction point, from these ascospores while in the ascus as well as after they’ve discharged. Germination of spores has been observed in the ascus as well. These spores may then infect tissue or remain in a saprophytic stage.[8] In the lab, 20% of conidia form germ tubes by 48 hours after release from the ascus. Germ tubes protrude from the apical end of conidia. Extending hyphae are long and thin, sometimes branch, and in an appressed manner appear to follow the leaf contours in growth. These hyphae grow over guard cells and enter the leaf tissue through open stomata. Two germ tubes may even form from the same spore, the second protruding from the opposite end of the cell. This is the only known method of entry by T.caerulescens, no direct penetration or appresoria have been observed in this species. Thus, infection occurs only on the underside of leaves, where stomata are found. In the saprophytic stage the single celled spores grow like yeast, that is to say they bud (replicate) directly. Spores may be disseminated by wind or rain. These cells then overwinter and serve as inoculum the following spring.[7]

Environment[]

Taphrina caerulescens, as with all other Taprhina species, thrives in cool, wet environments. Environmental conditions play a large role in the ability of Taphrina species because they are highly dependent upon leaf surface moisture to infect budding leaf tissue. A similar species to T. caerulescens is the more studied T. deformans (causing leaf peach curl) which requires temperatures to be less than 16 and 19⁰C in the infection and incubation for the pathogen to infect successfully.[14] Some scientists argue that the pathogen is especially successful at such low temperatures, not necessarily because it is so well adapted to low temperatures, but also in part because at higher temperatures the plant is able to outgrow the infection, as evidenced by hyphal growth being present in leaf tissue in both <16⁰C and >16⁰C.[14]

Control[]

Management recommendations for oak leaf blister is primarily to focus on mitigating other stressors to the tree. Watering and fertilizing infected trees can help reduce stress on the tree and can reduce disease symptoms .[15] Sanitation methods such as removing fallen leaves in autumn can reduce disease inoculum for the following spring [16] Fungicide application is not a necessary management strategy because T. caerulescens does not severely harm plant health and is considered a purely cosmetic disease. If, in rare cases, the disease is severe, fungicides can be applied in spring before the tree buds. Fungicides recommended are: Bordeaux mixture, chlorothalonil, liquid copper, and liquid lime sulfur.[17][18] If homeowners decide fungicides are necessary, plant pathologists recommend hiring professionals to apply the chemicals and not apply the sprays themselves.[11] Fungicides must be applied before the tree buds to be effective. Once the spores have infected the young bud tissue in spring it will be too late to reduce disease by fungicide treatment.[19] Application of fungicides can reduce symptoms of the T. caerulescens, but once the disease is present it can only be reduced, not eradicated [20] As with most foliar fungal diseases, it is too late to apply a fungicide if symptoms are already being spotted, and all management options will be to reduce inoculum for the next spring by raking leaves, or to apply a chemical spray the following spring to reduce infection.[17][21]

Importance[]

Oak leaf blister is not considered a significant threat to tree health and is a cosmetic disease. Although the disease causes very little damage to plant health, it is important because it is found throughout the United States.[22]

Similar species[]

The blisters and masses of pale spores produced by T. caerulescens can resemble the felty mass caused by the erineum mite, Aceria mackiei.[23] Click on the proceeding reference link for photos comparing the two.

References[]

  1. ^ "Taphrina caerulescens (Desm. & Mont.) Tul. 1866". MycoBank. International Mycological Asso. Retrieved 2011-05-04.
  2. ^ Moore RT. (1990). "The genus Lalaria gen. nov.: Taphrinales anamorphosum". Mycotaxon. 38: 315–30.
  3. ^ Snider, R. D.; Kramer, C. L. (1974). "Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and numerical taxonomy of Taphrina caerulescens and Taphrina deformans". Mycologia. 66 (5): 743–753. doi:10.2307/3758195. JSTOR 3758195.
  4. ^ Jump up to: a b Mix, A., J. 1954. Differentiation of species of Taphrina in culture. Ultilization of nitrogen compounds. Mycologia, 45(6), 721-727.
  5. ^ Jump up to: a b Mix, A., J. 1953. Differentiation of species of Taphrina in culture. Utilization of nitrogen compounds. Mycologia, 45(5), 649-670. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/4547747.
  6. ^ Jump up to: a b c Sinclair, W. A., Lyon, H. H., & Johnson, W. T. (1987) Diseases of trees and shrubs. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  7. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e Taylor, Josephine; Birdwell, Dale O. (2000). "A scanning electron microscopic study of the infection of water oak (Quercus nigra) by Taphrina caerulescens". Mycologia. 92 (2): 309–311. doi:10.2307/3761566. JSTOR 3761566.
  8. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g Birdwell, D.O. (1996). Pathogenicity studies of Taphrina caerulescens causal organism of oak leaf blister disease (Masters thesis)UMI/ProQuest dissertations and theses (UMI No. 1379244)CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  9. ^ Jump up to: a b Jensen-Tracey, S. (2011) Oak Leaf Blister: Taphrina caerulescens. Retrieved from Cornell University, Department of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Website. http://plantclinic.cornell.edu/factsheets/oakleafblister.pdf
  10. ^ Riffle, J. W. & Petterson, G. W. (technical coordinators) (1986). Diseases of trees in the great plains. Fort Collins, CO. United States Department of Agriculture. pp 20-21 Retrieved from http://nac.unl.edu/diseasetrees/
  11. ^ Jump up to: a b "Oak Leaf Blister" (PDF). Cornell University Plant Disease Diagnostic clinic. Retrieved 11/12/12. Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  12. ^ Camp, R. R.; Whittingham, W. F. (1974). "Ultrastructural alterations in oak leaves parasitized by Taphrina caerulescens". American Journal of Botany. 61 (9): 964–972. doi:10.2307/2441987. JSTOR 2441987.
  13. ^ Conway, K., Watkins, J. Diseases of trees in the Great Plains. 1986. Fort Collins, CO. United States Department of Agriculture. Pp20-21. Retrieved from http://nac.unl/diseasetrees/[permanent dead link]
  14. ^ Jump up to: a b Rossi, V. Bolognesi, M., Languasco, L. (2007). Influence of Environmental Conditions on Infection of Peach Shoots by Taphrina deformans. Phytopathology. (96)2, 155-163. doi:10.1094/PHYTO-96-0155”
  15. ^ Partridge, J.E. (2008) “Oak Leaf Blister”. University of Nebraska, Lincoln. Department of Plant Pathology. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2010-07-24. Retrieved 2012-10-24.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  16. ^ Oak Leaf Blister. Texas Plant Disease Diagnostic Lab (2002). Retrieved from: http://plantclinic.tamu.edu/helpful-factsheets/oak-leaf-blister/.
  17. ^ Jump up to: a b Oak Leaf Blister. Manitoba Agriculture, Food, and Rural Initiatives. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/diseases/fac52s00.html Archived 2013-04-21 at the Wayback Machine
  18. ^ Thomson, Sherman. "Oak Leaf Blister". Utah State University Extension. Archived from the original on 2013-02-13. Retrieved 11/28/12. Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  19. ^ “Oak Leaf Blister” Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/diseases/fac52s00.html Archived 2013-04-21 at the Wayback Machine
  20. ^ Focus on Oak Leaf Blister. (1999). Mississippi State University Extension. <http://msucares.com/newsletters/pests/infobytes/19990217.htm>
  21. ^ Managing foliar fungal diseases: Timing is everything. Grounds Maintenance, 34(3), 62-68. Retrieved from http://grounds-mag.com/mag/grounds_maintenance_managing_foliar_fungal/.
  22. ^ Widely prevalent fungi throughout the United States. 2012. University of Georgia Extension. Retrieved from http://prevalentfungi.org/subject.cfm?id=707
  23. ^ Homes, Gardens, Landscapes, and Turf > Trees and Shrubs > Diseases How to Manage Pests Pests in Gardens and Landscapes Taphrina leaf curl—Taphrina spp.">"Managing Pests in Gardens: Diseases: Tamphrina Leaf Curl—UC IPM". ipm.ucanr.edu. Retrieved 25 January 2020.

External links[]

Retrieved from ""