Time-invariant system

It has been suggested that this article be merged into Linear time-invariant system. (Discuss) Proposed since July 2021.

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources:  –  ·  ·  · scholar · JSTOR (May 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Block diagram illustrating the time invariance for a deterministic continuous-time SISO system. The system is time-invariant if and only if ${\displaystyle y_{2}(t)=y_{1}(t-t_{0})}$ for all time ${\displaystyle t}$, for all real constant ${\displaystyle t_{0}}$ and for all input ${\displaystyle x_{1}(t)}$.^[1][2][3] Click image to expand it.

A time-invariant (TIV) system has a time-dependent system function that is not a direct function of time. Such systems are regarded as a class of systems in the field of system analysis. The time-dependent system function is a function of the time-dependent input function. If this function depends only indirectly on the time-domain (via the input function, for example), then that is a system that would be considered time-invariant. Conversely, any direct dependence on the time-domain of the system function could be considered as a "time-varying system".

Mathematically speaking, "time-invariance" of a system is the following property:^{[4]: p. 50}

Given a system with a time-dependent output function ${\displaystyle y(t),}$ and a time-dependent input function ${\displaystyle x(t);}$ the system will be considered time-invariant if a time-delay on the input ${\displaystyle x(t+\delta )}$ directly equates to a time-delay of the output ${\displaystyle y(t+\delta )}$ function. For example, if time ${\displaystyle t}$ is "elapsed time", then "time-invariance" implies that the relationship between the input function ${\displaystyle x(t)}$ and the output function ${\displaystyle y(t)}$ is constant with respect to time ${\displaystyle t}$:

${\displaystyle y(t)=f(x(t),t)=f(x(t)).}$

In the language of signal processing, this property can be satisfied if the transfer function of the system is not a direct function of time except as expressed by the input and output.

In the context of a system schematic, this property can also be stated as follows, as shown in the figure to the right:

If a system is time-invariant then the system block commutes with an arbitrary delay.

If a time-invariant system is also linear, it is the subject of linear time-invariant theory (linear time-invariant) with direct applications in NMR spectroscopy, seismology, circuits, signal processing, control theory, and other technical areas. Nonlinear time-invariant systems lack a comprehensive, governing theory. Discrete time-invariant systems are known as shift-invariant systems. Systems which lack the time-invariant property are studied as time-variant systems.

Simple example[]

To demonstrate how to determine if a system is time-invariant, consider the two systems:

• System A: ${\displaystyle y(t)=tx(t)}$
• System B: ${\displaystyle y(t)=10x(t)}$

Since the System Function ${\displaystyle y(t)}$ for system A explicitly depends on t outside of ${\displaystyle x(t)}$, it is not time-invariant because the time-dependence is not explicitly a function of the input function.

In contrast, system B's time-dependence is only a function of the time-varying input ${\displaystyle x(t)}$. This makes system B time-invariant.

The Formal Example below shows in more detail that while System B is a Shift-Invariant System as a function of time, t, System A is not.

Formal example[]

A more formal proof of why systems A and B above differ is now presented. To perform this proof, the second definition will be used.

System A: Start with a delay of the input ${\displaystyle x_{d}(t)=x(t+\delta )}$

${\displaystyle y(t)=tx(t)}$

${\displaystyle y_{1}(t)=tx_{d}(t)=tx(t+\delta )}$

Now delay the output by ${\displaystyle \delta }$

${\displaystyle y(t)=tx(t)}$

${\displaystyle y_{2}(t)=y(t+\delta )=(t+\delta )x(t+\delta )}$

Clearly ${\displaystyle y_{1}(t)\neq y_{2}(t)}$, therefore the system is not time-invariant.

System B: Start with a delay of the input ${\displaystyle x_{d}(t)=x(t+\delta )}$

${\displaystyle y(t)=10x(t)}$

${\displaystyle y_{1}(t)=10x_{d}(t)=10x(t+\delta )}$

Now delay the output by ${\displaystyle \delta }$

${\displaystyle y(t)=10x(t)}$

${\displaystyle y_{2}(t)=y(t+\delta )=10x(t+\delta )}$

Clearly ${\displaystyle y_{1}(t)=y_{2}(t)}$, therefore the system is time-invariant.

More generally, the relationship between the input and output is

${\displaystyle y(t)=f(x(t),t),}$

and its variation with time is

${\displaystyle {\frac {\mathrm {d} y}{\mathrm {d} t}}={\frac {\partial f}{\partial t}}+{\frac {\partial f}{\partial x}}{\frac {\mathrm {d} x}{\mathrm {d} t}}.}$

For time-invariant systems, the system properties remain constant with time,

${\displaystyle {\frac {\partial f}{\partial t}}=0.}$

Applied to Systems A and B above:

${\displaystyle f_{A}=tx(t)\qquad \implies \qquad {\frac {\partial f_{A}}{\partial t}}=x(t)\neq 0}$ in general, so it is not time-invariant,

${\displaystyle f_{B}=10x(t)\qquad \implies \qquad {\frac {\partial f_{B}}{\partial t}}=0}$ so it is time-invariant.

Abstract example[]

We can denote the shift operator by ${\displaystyle \mathbb {T} _{r}}$ where ${\displaystyle r}$ is the amount by which a vector's index set should be shifted. For example, the "advance-by-1" system

${\displaystyle x(t+1)=\delta (t+1)*x(t)}$

can be represented in this abstract notation by

${\displaystyle {\tilde {x}}_{1}=\mathbb {T} _{1}{\tilde {x}}}$

where ${\displaystyle {\tilde {x}}}$ is a function given by

${\displaystyle {\tilde {x}}=x(t)\forall t\in \mathbb {R} }$

with the system yielding the shifted output

${\displaystyle {\tilde {x}}_{1}=x(t+1)\forall t\in \mathbb {R} }$

So ${\displaystyle \mathbb {T} _{1}}$ is an operator that advances the input vector by 1.

Suppose we represent a system by an operator ${\displaystyle \mathbb {H} }$. This system is time-invariant if it commutes with the shift operator, i.e.,

${\displaystyle \mathbb {T} _{r}\mathbb {H} =\mathbb {H} \mathbb {T} _{r}\forall r}$

If our system equation is given by

${\displaystyle {\tilde {y}}=\mathbb {H} {\tilde {x}}}$

then it is time-invariant if we can apply the system operator ${\displaystyle \mathbb {H} }$ on ${\displaystyle {\tilde {x}}}$ followed by the shift operator ${\displaystyle \mathbb {T} _{r}}$, or we can apply the shift operator ${\displaystyle \mathbb {T} _{r}}$ followed by the system operator ${\displaystyle \mathbb {H} }$, with the two computations yielding equivalent results.

Applying the system operator first gives

${\displaystyle \mathbb {T} _{r}\mathbb {H} {\tilde {x}}=\mathbb {T} _{r}{\tilde {y}}={\tilde {y}}_{r}}$

Applying the shift operator first gives

${\displaystyle \mathbb {H} \mathbb {T} _{r}{\tilde {x}}=\mathbb {H} {\tilde {x}}_{r}}$

If the system is time-invariant, then

${\displaystyle \mathbb {H} {\tilde {x}}_{r}={\tilde {y}}_{r}}$

See also[]

• Finite impulse response
• Sheffer sequence
• State space (controls)
• Signal-flow graph
• LTI system theory
• Autonomous system (mathematics)

References[]