Western alienation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Western Canada
Political map of Canada

In Canadian politics, Western alienation is the notion that the Western provincesBritish Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba – have been alienated, and in some cases excluded, from mainstream Canadian political affairs in favour of Ontario and Quebec. Western alienation claims that these latter two are politically over-represented and economically favoured, which has given rise to the sentiment of alienation among many western Canadians.[1]

History of alienation[]

Following Confederation in 1867, the first Canadian Prime Minister, Sir John A. Macdonald, announced a "National Policy" to "broaden the base of the Canadian economy and restore the confidence of Canadians in the development of their country".[2]

The November 1974 Canadian federal budget terminated the deduction of provincial natural resources royalties from federal tax. According to Roy Romanow, this move kicked off the "resource war", a confrontation between Pierre Trudeau's federal government and the prairie Provinces over the control and revenues from natural resources extraction and energy production.[3]

Following a rapid increase in the price of oil between 1979 and 1980, the government of Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau introduced the National Energy Program (NEP), which intended to increase Canadian ownership in the oil industry, increase Canada's oil self-sufficiency and redistribute the wealth generated by oil production towards the federal government.[4] The program was extremely unpopular in the west,[4] where most of Canada's oil is produced, due to the resulting economic devastation which rivaled the great depression.[5][failed verification]

Current factors of alienation[]

Political factors[]

A source of Western irritation can be traced to the Quebec sovereignty movement. Some Western Canadians argue that Quebec receives undue attention from the rest of the country due to concerns about its desire to secede from Canada or obtain sovereignty-association.[6]

Economic factors[]

In 2005, Alberta's share of equalization payments was calculated to be approximately $1.1 billion,[7] less than what was provided, but significantly higher on a per capita basis than Ontario. Equalization payments are made by the federal government to the "have-not" provinces. Unlike social and health transfers, there are no restrictions over how this money is spent at the provincial level. In 2009–2010, Quebec received $8.552 billion,[8] making it the single largest beneficiary, as it has been throughout the program's history. In the 2009–2010 fiscal year, Ontario received an equalization payment of $347 million,[8]

British Columbia was a "have-not" province for just over five years, ending in 2006 and 2007, when it received $459 million.[8]

See also[]

References[]

  1. ^ "Western Canadians still feel more connected to their province than to country as a whole: Ipsos - Globalnews.ca". globalnews.ca. October 8, 2018.
  2. ^ Brown, Robert Craig. "National Policy". The Canadian Encyclopedia. Retrieved February 9, 2012.
  3. ^ Back to Blakeney : revitalizing the democratic state. McGrane, David,, Romanow, Roy J.,, Whyte, John D.,, Isinger, Russell, 1965-. Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada. August 24, 2019. ISBN 978-0-88977-641-8. OCLC 1090178443.CS1 maint: others (link)
  4. ^ Jump up to: a b Bregha, Francois. "National Energy Program". The Canadian Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on January 5, 2013. Retrieved February 9, 2012.
  5. ^ "Canadian Energy Overview 2010 – Energy Briefing Note". National Energy Board. Archived from the original on January 1, 2013. Retrieved February 9, 2012.
  6. ^ "Alienating the west". December 1, 2005 – via The Economist.
  7. ^ Bouquets of Gray: Equalization math. Bouquetsofgray.blogspot.com (July 18, 2005).
  8. ^ Jump up to: a b c "Federal Support to Quebec". Department of Finance Canada. Retrieved May 14, 2011.

Further reading[]

Retrieved from ""