Yemima Ben-Menahem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yemima Ben-Menahem
Prof Yemima Ben-Menahem.jpg
Born23 December 1946
Jerusalem, Israel
Alma materHebrew University of Jerusalem
EraContemporary philosophy
RegionWestern philosophy
Doctoral advisorsHilary Putnam, Mark Steiner
Main interests

Yemima Ben-Menahem (Hebrew: ימימה בן-מנחם‎, born 23 December 1946) is a professor (Emerita) of philosophy at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Her main area of expertise is philosophy of science, in particular philosophy of modern physics.[1]

Education and career[]

Ben-Menahem earned a BSc in physics and mathematics in 1969 and an MSc (summa cum laude) in philosophy of science in 1972, both from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. She earned her PhD in 1983 with a dissertation entitled "Paradoxes and Intuitions", under the direction of Hilary Putnam of Harvard University and Mark Steiner of the Hebrew University.

In 2001, Ben-Menahem founded the Journal Aleph: Historical Studies in Science and Judaism, which is a biannual, peer-reviewed academic publication.[2] She served as Director of the Edelstein Center for the History and Philosophy of Science, Technology and Medicine at the Hebrew University.[3] Since 2006, she has been member of the Academic Board of the Einstein Papers Project.[4]

In 2007, she curated the exhibition Newton's Secrets at the National Library of Israel.[5][6]

Philosophical work[]

Conventionalism[]

Ben-Menahem devoted several papers and a book to conventionalism,[7] a position first articulated by Henri Poincaré in the context of geometry. According to conventionalists, many of the assertions we take to express objective truths, are in fact conventions in disguise, derived from definitions or methodological decisions that are not forced on us by logic, mathematics, or empirical fact, and about which we have discretion. Ben-Menahem reads twentieth century science and philosophy from the perspective of the impact of conventionalism on these fields. The pronounced influence of conventionalism, according to her, is manifest in the philosophy of logic and mathematics, the theory of relativity, and the writings of leading twentieth century philosophers including Carnap, Wittgenstein, Putnam, and Quine.[8]

Causation[]

In Causation in Science, Ben-Menahem offers a novel account of causation, centered on the notion of causal constraint rather than the common notion of causal relation. The book analyses the interrelations between constraints such as determinism, locality, conservation laws, and variation principles. In response to the classic problem of human freedom, Ben-Menahem expounds a concept of lawlessness that permits human action to be subject to causes, without being derivable from, and predictable by, laws of nature.

The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics[]

Ben-Menahem addresses several controversial issues in the history and philosophy of quantum mechanics. She analyses the relation between quantum nonlocality and indeterminism, arguing that the payoff relation between these characteristics secures the compatibility of quantum mechanics with the special theory of relativity. She takes issue with the common understanding of the PBR theorem and with the received account of Schrödinger's position and the Bohr-Einstein controversy.

The Philosophy of history[]

Ben-Menahem sees the notion of contingency as crucial to the philosophy of history and to the possibility for human beings to make a difference in the course of historical events. Her analysis of the concepts of necessity and contingency in history draws on an analogy with the notions of stability and instability in science, where they play a prominent role in many areas, for instance, statistical mechanics and chaos theory.

General Philosophy of Science[]

One of the most debated subjects in contemporary philosophy of science is scientific realism, a position committed to the possibility of scientific truth and scientific knowledge. Realism is commended by its proponents as the only philosophy that can explain the impressive success of science and critiqued by its opponents for disregarding the underdetermination of science as well as its numerous failures. Ben-Menahem contributions to the debate around realism include her critique of the argument from success, her analysis of underdetermination and equivalent descriptions, her defense of the pragmatist concept of truth, and her highlighting the description-sensitivity of scientific laws.

Interpretative Work[]

Ben-Menahem has written on (among others) Jorge Luis Borges, Donald Davidson, Michel Foucault, William James, Emil Meyerson, Henri Poincaré.[9]

Books[]

  • Conventionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2006)
  • Causation in Science (Princeton University Press, 2018)

Books edited[]

  • Hilary Putnam (Cambridge University Press, 2005)
  • Probability in Physics (with Meir Hemmo) (Springer, 2012)

Selected articles[]

  • "Natural Laws and Human Language" in Engaging Putnam J. Conant and S. Chakraborty (eds.) (De Greuter) (2020) (forthcoming).
  • (With Hanina Ben-Menahem) "The Rule of Law: Natural, Human and Divine" Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 35 (2020) 139–159.
  • "The PBR Theorem: Whose Side is it On?" Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 57 (2017) 80–88.
  • “Borges on Replication and Concept Formation” in: Stepping in the Same River Twice, A. Shavit and A.M. Ellison (eds.) (Yale University Press) (2017) 23–36.
  • "If Counterfactuals Were Excluded from Historical Reasoning…" Journal of the Philosophy of History 10 (2016) 370–381
  • “The Web and the Tree: Quine and James on the Growth of Knowledge” in Quine and His Place in History, F. Janssen-Lauret and G. Kemp (eds) Palgrave (2016) 59–75.
  • “Poincare’s Impact on Twentieth Century Physics” HOPOS 6 (2016) 257–273.
  • “Revisiting the Refutation of Conventionalism”, The Library of Living Philosophers XXXIV, The Philosophy of Hilary Putnam, E. Auxier, D.R. Anderson, L.E. Hahn (eds), Open Court (2015) 451–478.
  • “Historical Necessity and Contingency” in: The Blackwell Companion to the Philosophy of History, A. Tucker (ed) Blackwells (2009) 120–130
  • . “Convention: Poincare and Some of his Critics”, British Journal for the philosophy of Science 52 (2001) 471–513.
  • “Direction and Description”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (2001) 621–635.
  • “Dummett Versus Bell on Quantum Mechanics”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28(1997) 277–290.
  • "Equivalent Descriptions", The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 41(1990) 261–279.
  • "The Inference to the Best Explanation", Erkenntnis 33 (1990) 319- 344.

See also[]

References[]

  1. ^ "Yemima Ben-Menachem". en.philosophy.huji.ac.il. Retrieved 1 May 2020.
  2. ^ "Project MUSE – Aleph: Historical Studies in Science and Judaism-Volume 18, Number 1, 2018". muse.jhu.edu. Retrieved 28 April 2020.
  3. ^ "The Edelstein Center". web.nli.org.il. Retrieved 28 April 2020.
  4. ^ "Executive Committee – Einstein Papers Project at Caltech". www.einstein.caltech.edu. Retrieved 28 April 2020.
  5. ^ Martin, Sean (11 October 2017). "Sir Isaac Newton predicted when the end of the world will come and we don't have long left". Express.co.uk. Retrieved 1 May 2020.
  6. ^ "Newton's secrets: curators, Yemima Ben-Menahem, Mordechai Feingold, Stephen Snobelen". The Jewish National and University Library, Jerusalem (in Hebrew). Retrieved 1 May 2020.
  7. ^ Ben-Menahem, Yemima (December 2009). "Conventionalism: From Poincare to Quine". Cambridge Core. Retrieved 28 April 2020.
  8. ^ Leng, Mary (1 October 2009). "Conventionalism, by Yemima Ben-Menahem". Mind. 118 (472): 1111–1115. doi:10.1093/mind/fzp113. ISSN 0026-4423.
  9. ^ "Yemima Ben-Menahem | The Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Academia.edu". shamash.academia.edu. Retrieved 11 June 2020.

External links[]

Retrieved from ""