Bellotti v. Baird (1979)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Bellotti v. Baird
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued February 27, 1979
Decided July 2, 1979
Full case nameBellotti, Attorney General of Massachusetts, et al. v. Baird, et al.
Citations443 U.S. 622 (more)
99 S. Ct. 3035; 61 L. Ed. 2d 797; 1979 U.S. LEXIS 17
Case history
PriorBellotti v. Baird, 428 U.S. 132 (1976); on remand, Baird v. Bellotti, 428 F. Supp. 854 (D. Mass. 1977); 450 F. Supp. 997 (D. Mass. 1978); probable jurisdiction noted, 439 U.S. 925 (1978).
SubsequentRehearing denied, 444 U.S. 887 (1979).
Holding
States may require parental notification before a minor may obtain an abortion, but must provide an alternative procedure to parental approval.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr. · Potter Stewart
Byron White · Thurgood Marshall
Harry Blackmun · Lewis F. Powell Jr.
William Rehnquist · John P. Stevens
Case opinions
PluralityPowell, joined by Burger, Stewart, Rehnquist
ConcurrenceRehnquist
ConcurrenceStevens (in judgment only), joined by Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun
DissentWhite
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Bellotti v. Baird, 443 U.S. 622 (1979), is a United States Supreme Court case that ruled 8-1 that teenagers do not have to secure parental consent to obtain an abortion.

The Court elaborated on its parental consent decision of 1976.[1] It implies that states may be able to require a pregnant, unmarried minor to obtain parental consent to an abortion if the state law provides an alternative procedure to parental approval, such as letting the minor seek a state judge's approval instead. The plurality opinion declined to extend the full right to minors to seek and obtain an abortion, which was granted to adult women in Roe v. Wade.[2] The Court rejected the extension to minors by placing emphasis on the especially vulnerable nature of children, their "inability to make critical decisions in an informed and mature manner; and the importance of the parental role in child rearing."[2][3]

Consent must be obtained from the parent(s) for a minor to have a nonemergency abortion and the parent(s) must know about the judicial proceedings, unless no parent(s) are available.[4] If the court decides the minor is mature and making an informed and capable decision, they can still deny the abortion based on its own decision or the parents.[4]

Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr., joined by Ma. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, Justice  Potter Stewart, and Justice William Rehnquist argued there are three reasons why children aren't like adults: the vulnerability of children, the lack of critical decision making, and reliance on parents guidance for their children upbringing.[4]

Justice John P. Stevens, joined by Justice William J. Brennan Jr., Justice Thurgood Marshall, and Justice Harry Blackmun, concluded that the Massachusetts statute was unconstitutional because first it allows for the court to deny the abortion despite the courts decision on the minor's maturity.[4] Second, consent was required in every case without giving the minor an option to an independent case to prove she was mature, leading to an 'absolute third-party veto'.[4]

If a state requires a pregnant minor to obtain consent of one or both parents, another alternative option must be available for the minor to receive the abortion.[4] The alternative process has four requirements: (1) the minor is permitted to demonstrate her maturity and informed decision making on having the abortion without parental consent, (2) if the minor does not prove maturity, she has the ability to convince the judge that the abortion would be the best decision for her (3) the minor must remain anonymous, and (4) the process must be expedited to ensure the abortion will be possible to obtain.[5]


See also[]

References[]

  1. ^ Bellotti v. Baird, 428 U.S. 132 (1976).
  2. ^ a b Wharton, Linda (2009). "Roe at Thirty-Six and Beyond: Enhancing Protection for Abortion Rights Through State Constitutions". William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law.
  3. ^ Bellotti v. Baird, 443 U.S. 622, 643 (1979).
  4. ^ a b c d e f "Belloti, Attorney General of Massechusetts, et al. v. Baird et al" (PDF).
  5. ^ Elson, A.L. (2004). "Bellotti v. Baird". Encyclopedia of Children and Childhood: In History and Society (Vol. 1, pp. 88-89).

External links[]

Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by .

  • v
  • t
Stub icon

This abortion-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by .

  • v
  • t
Retrieved from ""