United States Supreme Court case
Broadrick v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court of the United States Full case name Broadrick v. Oklahoma Citations 413 U.S. 601 (more 93 S. Ct. 2908; 37 L. Ed. 2d 830
Prior 338 F. Supp. 711 (W.D. Okla. 1972) The Oklahoma statute is not overly broad; the State of Oklahoma has the power to regulate partisan political activities
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William O. Douglas · William J. Brennan Jr. Potter Stewart · Byron White Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun Lewis F. Powell Jr. · William Rehnquist
Majority White, joined by Burger, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist Dissent Brennan, joined by Stewart, Marshall Dissent Douglas First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Broadrick v. Oklahoma United States Supreme Court decision upholding an Oklahoma statute which prohibited state employees from engaging in partisan political activities. Broadrick is often cited to enunciate the test for a facial overbreadth challenge that "the overbreadth of a statute must not only be real, but substantial as well, judged in relation to the statute's plainly legitimate sweep."
External links [ ]
United States First Amendment case law
Public displays Statutory religious Public funding Religion in Private religious speech Internal church affairs Taxpayer standing Blue laws Other
Free Exercise Clause
Exclusion of religion Ministerial exception Statutory religious exemptions
Freedom of speech (portal )
Unprotected
Incitementsedition Libel and
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan Hustler Magazine v. Falwell United States v. Alvarez Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus Fighting words andheckler's veto
Cantwell v. Connecticut Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire Terminiello v. City of Chicago Feiner v. New York Gregory v. City of Chicago Cohen v. California Nat'l Socialist Party v. Village of Skokie R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul Snyder v. Phelps Threats
Watts v. United States NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co. Virginia v. Black Elonis v. United States Obscenity Speech integral
Strict scrutiny Vagueness Symbolic speech Content-based Content-neutral In thepublic forum Designated
Widmar v. Vincent Rosenberger v. Univ. of Virginia Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski Nonpublic
Compelled speech Compelled subsidy
Government grants Government Loyalty oaths School speech Public employees
Pickering v. Board of Education Elrod v. Burns Mt. Healthy City School Dist. Board of Ed. v. Doyle Givhan v. Western Line Consol. School Dist. Connick v. Myers Rankin v. McPherson Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois Waters v. Churchill Garcetti v. Ceballos Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri Lane v. Franks Heffernan v. City of Paterson Hatch Act andLicensing and Commercial speech Campaign finance Anonymous speech State action
Marsh v. Alabama Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck Official retaliation
Freedom of the press
Prior restraints censorship Privacy Taxation and Defamation Broadcast media Copyrighted materials
Freedom of assembly
Incorporation
United States v. Cruikshank Presser v. Illinois Protection from prosecution
De Jonge v. Oregon Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta
Freedom of association
Organizations
Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath Watkins v. United States NAACP v. Alabama NAACP v. Button Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta Future Conduct Solicitation Membership restriction Primaries and elections
