United States Supreme Court case
Houston Community College System v. Wilson
Supreme Court of the United States Full case name Houston Community College System v. David Buren Wilson Docket no. 20-804 Does the First Amendment restrict the authority of an elected body to issue a censure resolution in response to a member's speech?
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Stephen Breyer Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch Brett Kavanaugh · Amy Coney Barrett
U.S. Const. amend. I
Houston Community College System v. Wilson (Docket 20–804) is a pending United States Supreme Court case related to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution .
Background [ ]
David Buren Wilson was elected a member of the Houston Community College System 's board in 2013.
Supreme Court [ ]
Certiorari was granted in the case on April 26, 2021.[1]
References [ ]
United States First Amendment case law
Public displays and ceremonies Statutory religious exemptions Public funding Religion in public schools Private religious speech Internal church affairs Taxpayer standing Blue laws Other
Free Exercise Clause
Exclusion of religion from public benefits Ministerial exception Statutory religious exemptions
Freedom of speech (portal )
Unprotected speech
Incitement and sedition Libel and false speech
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964)
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell (1988)
United States v. Alvarez (2012)
Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus (2014)
Fighting words and the heckler's veto
Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940)
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942)
Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949)
Feiner v. New York (1951)
Gregory v. City of Chicago (1969)
Cohen v. California (1971)
Nat'l Socialist Party v. Village of Skokie (1977)
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992)
Snyder v. Phelps (2011)
Threats
Watts v. United States (1969)
NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co. (1982)
Virginia v. Black (2003)
Elonis v. United States (2015)
Obscenity Speech integral to criminal conduct
Strict scrutiny Vagueness Symbolic speech versus conductContent-based restrictions Content-neutral restrictions In thepublic forum Designated public forum
Widmar v. Vincent (1981)
Rosenberger v. Univ. of Virginia (1995)
Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski (2021)
Nonpublic forum
Compelled speech Compelled subsidy of others' speech
Government grants and subsidies Government as speaker Loyalty oaths School speech Public employees
Pickering v. Board of Education (1968)
Elrod v. Burns (1976)
Mt. Healthy City School Dist. Board of Ed. v. Doyle (1977)
Givhan v. Western Line Consol. School Dist. (1979)
(1979)
Connick v. Myers (1983)
Rankin v. McPherson (1987)
Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois (1990)
Waters v. Churchill (1994)
Garcetti v. Ceballos (2006)
Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri (2011)
Lane v. Franks (2014)
Heffernan v. City of Paterson (2016)
Hatch Act and similar lawsLicensing and restriction of speech Commercial speech Campaign finance and political speech Anonymous speech State action
Marsh v. Alabama (1946)
Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner (1972)
Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck (2019)
Official retaliation
Freedom of the press
Prior restraints and censorship Privacy Taxation and privileges Defamation Broadcast media Copyrighted materials
Freedom of assembly
Incorporation
United States v. Cruikshank (1876)
Presser v. Illinois (1886)
Protection from prosecution and state restrictions
De Jonge v. Oregon (1937)
(1945)
Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta (2021)
Freedom of association
Organizations
Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath (1951)
Watkins v. United States (1957)
NAACP v. Alabama (1958)
NAACP v. Button (1963)
Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta (2021)
Future Conduct Solicitation Membership restriction Primaries and elections