Caliga v. Inter Ocean Newspaper Co.

Caliga v. Inter Ocean Newspaper Co.
Caliga v. Inter Ocean Newspaper Co.
	Supreme Court of the United States
Argued November 5, 1909; Decided November 29, 1909
Full case name	Caliga v. Inter Ocean Newspaper Co.
Citations	215 U.S. 182 (more) 30 S. Ct. 38; 54 L. Ed. 150
Holding
	A person cannot file a second copyright claim to amend the first, not even if the first was determined to be invalid.
Court membership
	Chief Justice Melville Fuller Associate Justices John M. Harlan · David J. Brewer; Edward D. White · Joseph McKenna; Oliver W. Holmes Jr. · William R. Day; William H. Moody
Case opinion
Majority	Day, joined by unanimous

Caliga v. Inter Ocean Newspaper Co., 215 U.S. 182 (1909), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held a person cannot file a second copyright claim to amend the first, even if the first was determined to be invalid.^[1]

References[]

^ Caliga v. Inter Ocean Newspaper Co., 215 U.S. 182 (1909).

External links[]

Text of Caliga v. Inter Ocean Newspaper Co., 215 U.S. 182 (1909) is available from: CourtListener Justia Library of Congress

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by .

[1] Caliga v. Inter Ocean Newspaper Co., 215 U.S. 182 (1909).

[1]

Caliga v. Inter Ocean Newspaper Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued November 5, 1909 Decided November 29, 1909
Full case name	Caliga v. Inter Ocean Newspaper Co.
Citations	215 U.S. 182 (more) 30 S. Ct. 38; 54 L. Ed. 150
Holding
A person cannot file a second copyright claim to amend the first, not even if the first was determined to be invalid.
Court membership
Chief Justice Melville Fuller Associate Justices John M. Harlan · David J. Brewer Edward D. White · Joseph McKenna Oliver W. Holmes Jr. · William R. Day William H. Moody
Case opinion
Majority	Day, joined by unanimous