Page extended-protected

Dalej jest noc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

First edition (Polish)
Publ. Centrum Badan nad Zaglada Zydow

Dalej jest noc: losy Żydów w wybranych powiatach okupowanej Polski ("Night without End: The Fate of Jews in Selected Counties of Occupied Poland"), co-edited by Jan Grabowski and Barbara Engelking, is a two-volume study published in 2018 by the Polish Center for Holocaust Research in Warsaw, Poland. The 1,600-page study contains nine chapters, each covering a county in occupied Poland in 1939–1945—Bielsk Podlaski, Biłgoraj, Bochnia, Dębica, Luków, Miechów, Nowy Targ, Węgrów, and Złoczów[1]—in the General Government area established by Germany in World War II. The study identifies small Polish towns as "death traps" for Jews in hiding.[2] An abridged English-language version of the study is forthcoming.[3]

Content

Reception

Before the book was published, supporters of the Polish government's ruling PiS party launched a campaign of defamation against the authors of the book. Government-aligned journalists and historians called the book "scientific humbug" (naukowa mistyfikacja) and accused its authors of applying "racism of sources" (rasizm źródłowy), by privileging Jewish over Polish testimonies. The Polish government cut funding to the journal of the Polish Center for Holocaust Research and also declined to renew Barbara Engelking's appointment to the International Council of the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum, though it is difficult to say whether these were coordinated actions or coincidental events.[4]

Reviews published by Poland's Institute of National Remembrance have criticized Dalej jest noc for using unreliable sources, for ignoring the context of Germany's draconian occupation policies and practices, for some authors' alleged personal interests, for selective treatment of witness statements (questioning Polish witnesses' statements, while taking at face value witness statements that were in line with authors' theses), and for presenting rumors and gossip as actual proven facts.[5][6][7][8][9]

Historian Piotr Gontarczyk charges the book with "scholarly mystification", citing the book's description of events in the Bochnia Ghetto in German-occupied Poland. Gontarczyk writes that the book "makes the Jewish Ghetto Police disappear, replacing it with Polish police." The Bochnia Ghetto, he says, witnessed "scenes out of Dante, with the participation of the Jewish Ghetto Police (Jüdische Ordnungstdienst); there were no Polish police [inside Jewish ghettos], but the book... says the bunkers [in which some Jews hid, hoping to escape deportation to German extermination camps] were searched by Polish police."[10][11] One of the book's authors, has replied that Gontarczyk is incorrect and that the book discusses the Jewish Ghetto Police in numerous places, and she, in turn, charges Gontarczyk with not having read the book thoroughly and with drawing incorrect conclusions from a cursory reading.[12]

Historian  [pl] writes that the study is based on a solid analysis of sources. He notes the naming of perpetrators and co-perpetrators – individuals who took over Jewish property – and participation by the Polish Blue Police, Baudienst, fire brigades, and military guards. He writes that the study is important in deconstructing some political myths and propaganda in Polish history writing, journalism, church pronouncements, and politics. He concludes that the two volumes are "solid and reliable scholarship".[13]

, writes that the book focuses on micro-history studies and case-study analysis. She calls it a unique book with both a clear scholarly goal and a political message, taking a clear stance in the ongoing discussion in Poland about Polish-Jewish historical relations. She writes that the book is valuable for its solid methodology, rare and personal focus on micro-history, and demonstration of how significant were varying local characteristics, which resulted in widely different and not fully generalizable circumstances that Jews faced in different parts of occupied Poland. She does note that the book may, however, lack an overarching methodological conclusion and does not attempt a new grand theory of Polish-Jewish wartime history.[14]

Beth Holmgren writes that Dalej jest noc is a "highly detailed, systematically organized, data-based analysis of how and by whom the Holocaust was perpetrated in nine separate Polish counties".[15] Ingo Loose, a historian at the Institute for Contemporary History, states that the book debunks the view that "non-Jewish Poles helped Jews en masse" and were at worst bystanders. He states that the book will continue to have value for many years and to many researchers, expressing hope that the book would eventually be translated into German or English.[16]

's review of the book focuses particularly on the chapter by Jan Grabowski. Roguski writes that the book deals with an interesting topic that needs further research. He commends the authors for pioneering work but criticizes some of its methodology, its use of some primary sources to the neglect of others, its too narrow focus, and its statistical conclusions.[6]

 [pl] writes that "the study was based on an impressive range of sources. Its authors’ widespread search for sources included many archives in Poland, Israel, the United States, Germany, Ukraine, Belarus and Russia. These include the acts of the German and Polish administration, ... the Polish underground state, the government–in-exile, Jewish self-help organizations, the Polish language press published by the Nazis, the underground press, the acts from the post-war trials in Poland and Germany, as well as the records of Jewish and Polish witnesses. The authors managed to develop an exhaustive picture of a previously under studied stage of the Holocaust of the Polish Jews. They developed an excellent methodology which—it is to be hoped—will be applied to subsequent studies of this type concerning the remaining parts of the General Government."[17]

Litigation against editors

Dalej jest noc accuses Edward Malinowski, sołtys of the Polish village of Malinowo, of having been responsible for the deaths of dozens of Jews who were in hiding from the Germans during World War II. His 94-year-old relative Filomena Leszczyńska is suing Professors Engelking and Grabowski, the book's editors, in Warsaw court for defaming Malinowski; Leszczyńska asserts that, on the contrary, Malinowski had assisted Jews, at the risk of his own life and the lives of his family.[18] Leszczyńska's lawyer was hired by the Polish League against Defamation. Three sentences in the book were objected to; the plaintiffs seek 100,000 PLN in compensation, and an apology to be printed in a newspaper. Engelking responded: "I didn't write that I thought he had betrayed the Jews. I reported the witness's opinion". Estera Drogicka told that Malinowski helped her but also that she was aware that he was partly guilty of the deaths of several Jews who were in hiding, but bertayed to the Germans. She also confessed of false testimony after the war in favor of Malinowski. Two her sons confirmed her account.[19][20][21]

Israel's official Holocaust memorial, Yad Vashem, stated "Legal proceedings against Holocaust scholars because of their research are incompatible with accepted academic research norms and amount to an attack on the effort to achieve a full and balanced picture of the history of the Holocaust".[22][23]  [pl], director of the Polin Museum, stated, "The involvement in this trial of an organisation heavily subsidised with public funds can be easily construed as a form of censorship and an attempt to frighten scholars away from publishing the results of their research out of fear of a lawsuit and the ensuing costly litigation".[24]

In February 2021, a Warsaw court ruled that Grabowski and Engelking must apologize for their claims about Malinowski, but it did not order them to pay compensation. Grabowski and Engelking were planning to appeal the verdict.[25] The Polish Center for Holocaust Research published a detailed response by Engelking to the accusations and trial.[26] In August 2021, an appeals court overturned the February ruling; the Polish League against Defamation would later announce plans for a counterappeal to the Supreme Court of Poland.[27]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Dalej jest noc. Losy Żydów w wybranych powiatach okupowanej Polski". Academia.edu.
  2. ^ "Study says Polish neighbors betrayed many more Jews than previously thought". Jewish Telegraphic Agency, 11 May 2018.
  3. ^ Frydel, Tomasz (2018). "The Ongoing Challenge of Producing an Integrated Microhistory of the Holocaust in East Central Europe". Journal of Genocide Research. 20 (4): 624–631. doi:10.1080/14623528.2018.1527091. S2CID 81919464.
  4. ^ Kończal, Kornelia (2020). "Mnemonic Populism: The Polish Holocaust Law and its Afterlife". European Review: 1–13. doi:10.1017/S1062798720000502. ISSN 1062-7987. In any case, the leaders and supporters of PiS launched a campaign defaming scholars from the Polish Centre for Holocaust Research – especially Barbara Engelking and Jan Grabowski – before their book was published and accompanied the debate about it with a combination of discursive and disciplining practices. For instance, the Prime Minister did not prolong the tenure of Engelking as chairwoman of the International Council of the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum, the Minister of Culture cut funding for the Centre’s journal, and the Polish League Against Defamation has intensified its attacks against Grabowski (MS 2018; Mrozek 2018; Leszczyński 2018). Historians and journalists supporting the government publicly libelled Night without an End as ‘scientific humbug’ (naukowa mistyfikacja) accusing its authors of what they call ‘racism of sources’ (rasizm źródłowy), i.e. the privileging of Jewish over Polish testimonies (Gontarczyk 2019a; Gontarczyk 2019b). Right-wing activists did the same during public events, and the Institute of National Remembrance, meanwhile transformed into an agency implementing the state-sponsored politics of memory, commissioned a number of extended critical ‘reviews’ of Night without an End in Polish and other languages (Lyon-Caen 2019; Domański 2019). Although it is difficult to say whether these counter-measures were part of a coordinated action or an accidental accumulation of spontaneous activities, taken together, they show how ruthless the defenders of Poland’s innocence can be.
  5. ^ Tomasz Domański, "Korekta obrazu? Refleksje źródłoznawcze wokół książki Dalej jest noc. Losy Żydów w wybranych powiatach okupowanej Polski" ("A Corrected Picture? Reflections on Use of Sources in the Book, Dalej jest noc. Losy Żydów w wybranych powiatach okupowanej Polski", IPN, Polish-Jewish Studies, 2019, 72 pp.
  6. ^ a b Tomasz Roguski, "Dalej jest noc. Losy Żydów w wybranych powiatach okupowanej Polski, red. Barbara Engelking i Jan Grabowski", Glaukopis, no. 36, pp. 335–356.
  7. ^ [1] "Ukazały się kolejne trzy recenzje IPN na temat publikacji [Three More IPN Reviews Have Appeared of] Dalej jest noc", Dzieje.pl 21.02.19.
  8. ^ , "Nowatorska noc. Kilka uwag na marginesie artykułu Karoliny Panz" ["Innovative Night: Some Remarks about 's Article"], Zeszyty Historyczne WiN-u nr [no.] 47, 2018, pp. 109–34.
  9. ^ , "[2] "Wraca spór o zagładzie" ["Argument over Genocide Returns"], Rzeczpospolita, 10 February 2019.
  10. ^ Piotr Gontarczyk, "Między nauką a mistyfikacją, czyli o naturze piśmiennictwa prof. Jana Grabowskiego na podstawie casusu wsi Wrotnów i Międzyleś powiatu węgrowskiego" ("Between Scholarship and Mystification: On the Nature of Professor Jan Grabowski's Writings, Based on the Cases of the Villages of Wrotnów and Międzyleś in Węgrów County"), Glaukopis, no. 36, pp. 313–323.
  11. ^ "Piotr Gontarczyk zarzuca publikacji Centrum Badań nad Zagładą Żydów "naukową mistyfikację"" (in Polish). polskieradio.pl. 10 March 2019. Retrieved 10 March 2019.
  12. ^ Swałtek-Niewińska, Dagmara (22 March 2019). "Piotr Gontarczyk i tygodnik "Sieci" złapani na kłamstwie, czyli nowa szkoła polemiki o Zagładzie". wyborcza.pl. Retrieved 29 February 2020.
  13. ^ Chrobaczyński, Jacek. "Osaczeni, samotni, bezbronni... Refleksje po lekturze książki Dalej jest noc. Losy Żydów w wybranych powiatach okupowanej Polski (Polish with English abstract), T. I, II, pod redakcją Barbary Engelking i Jana Grabowskiego, Warszawa 2018." Res Gestae 6 (2018): 266–301.
  14. ^ Koprowska, Karolina (2018). "Nocne i dzienne historie: doświadczenie Zagłady na polskiej prowincji. (O książce "Dalej jest noc. Losy Żydów w wybranych powiatach okupowanej Polski")". Wielogłos (in Polish). 2 (36): 161–174. doi:10.4467/2084395XWI.18.025.9970. ISSN 1897-1962.
  15. ^ Holmgren, Beth. "Holocaust History and Jewish Heritage Preservation: Scholars and Stewards Working in PiS-Ruled Poland." Shofar 37.1 (2019): 96–107.
  16. ^ "Rezension zu: B. Engelking u.a. (Hrsg.): Dalej jest noc". H-Soz-Kult. Kommunikation und Fachinformation für die Geschichtswissenschaften (in German). Retrieved 3 February 2021.
  17. ^ Kopciowski, Adam (2020). "Review of Dalej jest noc. Losy Żydów w wybranych powiatach okupowanej Polski [Night Without an End. The Fate of Jews in Selected Counties of Occupied Poland]". The Polish Review. 65 (2): 83–85. ISSN 0032-2970. JSTOR 10.5406/polishreview.65.2.0083.
  18. ^ [3] Sławomir Cedzyński, "Pozew przeciwko Engelking i Grabowskiemu. Zarzut: publikacja zmyślonych informacji" ("Court Summons for Engelking and Grabowski. The Charge: Publication of Fabricated Information"), TVP INFO, 20 May 2019.
  19. ^ [4] "The RDI [Polish League against Defamation] Backs the Family of Edward Malinowski in Their Lawsuit against Prof. Barbara Engelking and Dr. Jan Grabowski", Polish League against Defamation, 21 May 2019.
  20. ^ Leszczyński, Adam. "Zaczął się proces badaczy Zagłady za wyniki badań. Stawką jest wolność badań naukowych" [The trial of Holocaust researchers for their research results has begun. At stake is the freedom of scientific research]. oko.press. Retrieved 17 January 2021.
  21. ^ "Ostatnia rozprawa w procesie przeciwko redaktorom "Dalej jest noc"" (in Polish). 13 January 2021. Retrieved 17 January 2021.
  22. ^ "Yad Vashem says libel suit against Polish historians is an 'assault' on Holocaust research". Haaretz.com. Retrieved 3 February 2021.
  23. ^ "Yad Vashem Decries Ongoing Libel Trial Against Holocaust Scholars in Poland as 'Attack' on Academic Research". Algemeiner.com. Retrieved 3 February 2021.
  24. ^ "Fears rise that Polish libel trial could threaten future Holocaust research". The Guardian. 3 February 2021. Retrieved 3 February 2021.
  25. ^ Charlish, Alan; Wlodarczak-Semczuk, Anna (9 February 2021). "Polish court orders historians to apologise over Holocaust book". Reuters. Retrieved 10 February 2021.
  26. ^ Engelking, Barbara. "On Estera Siemiatycka, sołtys Edward Malinowski, and lawsuits". Polish Center for Holocaust Research. Retrieved 12 February 2021.
  27. ^ "Polish appeals court dismisses claims against Holocaust book historians". Reuters. 16 August 2021. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
Retrieved from ""