David Brooks (commentator)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about an American cultural commentator. For other people named David Brooks, see David Brooks (disambiguation).

David Brooks
David Brooks - National Book Festival 2019 (cropped).jpg
Brooks in 2019
Born (1961-08-11) August 11, 1961 (age 60)
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
NationalityAmerican
Alma materUniversity of Chicago
OccupationColumnist, pundit
Spouse(s)
  • Sarah (née Jane Hughes; m. 1986; div. 2013)
  • Anne Snyder
    ​
    (m. 2017)​

David Brooks (born August 11, 1961)[1] is a conservative political and cultural commentator who writes for The New York Times.[2][3] He has worked as a film critic for The Washington Times, a reporter and later op-ed editor for The Wall Street Journal,[4] a senior editor at The Weekly Standard from its inception, a contributing editor at Newsweek, and The Atlantic Monthly, and a commentator on NPR and the PBS NewsHour.[1]

Early life and education[]

Brooks was born in Toronto, Ontario, where his father was working on a PhD at the University of Toronto. He spent his early years in the middle-income Stuyvesant Town housing development in New York City with his brother, Daniel. His father taught English literature at New York University, while his mother studied nineteenth-century British history at Columbia University. Brooks was raised Jewish but rarely attends synagogue.[5][6][7] As a young child, Brooks attended the Grace Church School, an independent Episcopal primary school in the East Village. When he was 12, his family moved to the Philadelphia Main Line, the affluent suburbs of Philadelphia. He graduated from Radnor High School in 1979. In 1983, Brooks graduated from the University of Chicago with a degree in history.[1] His senior thesis was on popular science writer Robert Ardrey.[7]

As an undergraduate, Brooks frequently contributed reviews and satirical pieces to campus publications. His senior year, he wrote a spoof of the lifestyle of wealthy conservative William F. Buckley Jr., who was scheduled to speak at the university: "In the afternoons he is in the habit of going into crowded rooms and making everybody else feel inferior. The evenings are reserved for extended bouts of name-dropping."[8] To his piece, Brooks appended the note: "Some would say I'm envious of Mr. Buckley. But if truth be known, I just want a job and have a peculiar way of asking. So how about it, Billy? Can you spare a dime?" When Buckley arrived to give his talk, he asked whether Brooks was in the lecture audience and offered him a job.[9]

Early career[]

Upon graduation, Brooks became a police reporter for the City News Bureau of Chicago, a wire service owned jointly by the Chicago Tribune and Chicago Sun Times.[1] He says that his experience on Chicago's crime beat had a conservatizing influence on him.[7] In 1984, mindful of the offer he had received from Buckley, Brooks applied and was accepted as an intern at Buckley's National Review. According to Christopher Beam, the internship included an all-access pass to the affluent lifestyle that Brooks had previously mocked, including yachting expeditions, Bach concerts, dinners at Buckley's Park Avenue apartment and villa in Stamford, Connecticut, and a constant stream of writers, politicians, and celebrities.

Brooks was an outsider in more ways than his relative inexperience. National Review was a Catholic magazine, and Brooks is not Catholic. Sam Tanenhaus later reported in The New Republic that Buckley might have eventually named Brooks his successor if it hadn't been for his being Jewish. "If true, it would be upsetting," Brooks says.[7]

After his internship with Buckley ended, Brooks spent some time at the conservative Hoover Institution at Stanford University and wrote movie reviews for The Washington Times.

Career[]

Brooks and PBS staff at rehearsal for PBS Newshour in 2012.

In 1986, Brooks was hired by The Wall Street Journal, where he worked first as an editor of the book review section. He also filled in for five months as a movie critic. From 1990 to 1994, the newspaper posted Brooks as an op-ed columnist to Brussels, where he covered Russia (making numerous trips to Moscow); the Middle East; South Africa; and European affairs. On his return, Brooks joined the neo-conservative Weekly Standard when it was launched in 1994. Two years later, he edited an anthology, Backward and Upward: The New Conservative Writing.[1][4]

External video
video icon Booknotes interview with Brooks on Bobos, July 30, 2000, C-SPAN

In 2000, Brooks published a book of cultural commentary titled Bobos in Paradise: The New Upper Class and How They Got There to considerable acclaim. The book, a paean to consumerism, argued that the new managerial or "new upper class" represents a marriage between the liberal idealism of the 1960s and the self-interest of the 1980s.

According to a 2010 article in New York Magazine written by Christopher Beam, New York Times editorial-page editor Gail Collins called Brooks in 2003 and invited him to lunch.

Collins was looking for a conservative to replace outgoing columnist William Safire, but one who understood how liberals think. "I was looking for the kind of conservative writer that wouldn't make our readers shriek and throw the paper out the window," says Collins. "He was perfect." Brooks started writing in September 2003. "The first six months were miserable," Brooks says. "I'd never been hated on a mass scale before."[7]

In 2004, Brooks' book On Paradise Drive: How We Live Now (And Always Have) in the Future Tense was published as a sequel to his 2000 best seller, Bobos in Paradise, but it was not as well received as its predecessor. Brooks is also the volume editor of The Best American Essays (publication date October 2, 2012), and authored The Social Animal: The Hidden Sources of Love, Character and Achievement.[10] The book was excerpted in The New Yorker in January 2011[11] and received mixed reviews upon its full publication in March of that year.[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] The book has been a commercial success, reaching the #3 spot on the Publishers Weekly best-sellers list for non-fiction in April 2011.[26]

Brooks was a visiting professor of public policy at Duke University's Terry Sanford Institute of Public Policy, and taught an undergraduate seminar there in the fall of 2006.[27] In 2013, he taught a course at Yale University on philosophical humility.[28]

In 2012, Brooks was elected to the University of Chicago Board of Trustees.[29] He also serves on the Board of Advisors for the University of Chicago Institute of Politics.[30]

In 2019, Brooks gave a TED talk in Vancouver entitled 'The Lies Our Culture Tells Us About What Matters – And a Better Way to Live'. TED curator Chris Anderson selected it as one of his favourite talks of 2019.[31]

Political views[]

Brooks on PBS Newshour discussing the US presidential election in 2016.

Ideologically, Brooks has been described as a moderate,[32] a centrist,[33] a conservative,[34][35][36][37][38][39] and a moderate conservative.[40][41] Brooks has described himself as a "moderate",[42] and said in a 2017 interview that "[one] of [his] callings is to represent a certain moderate Republican Whig political philosophy."[43] Ottawa Citizen conservative commentator David Warren has identified Brooks as a "sophisticated pundit"; one of "those Republicans who want to 'engage with' the liberal agenda".[44] When asked what he thinks of charges that he's "not a real conservative" or "squishy", Brooks has said that "if you define conservative by support for the Republican candidate or the belief that tax cuts are the correct answer to all problems, I guess I don't fit that agenda. But I do think that I'm part of a long-standing conservative tradition that has to do with Edmund Burke ... and Alexander Hamilton."[45] In fact, Brooks read Burke's work while he was an undergraduate at the University of Chicago and "completely despised it", but "gradually over the next five to seven years ... came to agree with him". Brooks claims that "my visceral hatred was because he touched something I didn't like or know about myself."[46] In September 2012, Brooks talked about being criticized from the conservative side, saying, "If it's from a loon, I don't mind it. I get a kick out of it. If it's Michelle Malkin attacking, I don't mind it." With respect to whether he was "the liberals' favorite conservative" Brooks said he "didn't care", stating: "I don't mind liberals praising me, but when it's the really partisan liberals, you get an avalanche of love, it's like uhhh, I gotta rethink this."[45]

Brooks describes himself as having originally been a liberal before, as he put it, "coming to my senses." He recounts that a turning point in his thinking came while he was still an undergraduate, when he was selected to present the socialist point of view during a televised debate with Nobel laureate free-market economist Milton Friedman.[5] As Brooks describes it, "[It] was essentially me making a point, and he making a two-sentence rebuttal which totally devastated my point. ... That didn't immediately turn me into a conservative, but ..."[47]

Before the 2003 invasion of Iraq, Brooks argued forcefully for American military intervention, echoing the belief of commentators and political figures that American and British forces would be welcomed as liberators.[48][49] In 2005, Brooks wrote what columnist Jonathan Chait described as "a witheringly condescending" column portraying Senator Harry Reid as an "unhinged conspiracy theorist because he accused the [George W. Bush] administration of falsifying its Iraq intelligence."[50][51] By 2008, five years into the war, Brooks maintained that the decision to go to war was correct, but that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld had botched U.S. war efforts.[52] In 2015, Brooks wrote that "[f]rom the current vantage point, the decision to go to war was a clear misjudgment" made in 2003 by President George W. Bush and the majority of Americans who supported the war, including Brooks himself.[53] Brooks wrote "many of us thought that, by taking down Saddam Hussein, we could end another evil empire, and gradually open up human development in Iraq and the Arab world. Has that happened? In 2004, I would have said yes. In 2006, I would have said no. In 2015, I say yes and no, but mostly no."[53] Citing the Robb-Silberman report, Brooks rejected as a "fable" the idea that "intelligence about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction was all cooked by political pressure, that there was a big political conspiracy to lie us into war."[53] Instead, Brooks viewed the war as a product of faulty intelligence, writing that "[t]he Iraq war error reminds us of the need for epistemological modesty."[53]

His dismissal of the conviction of Scooter Libby as being "a farce" and having "no significance"[54] was derided by political blogger Andrew Sullivan.[55]

On August 10, 2006, Brooks wrote a column for The New York Times titled "Party No. 3". The column imagined a moderate McCain-Lieberman Party in opposition to both major parties, which he perceived as polarized and beholden to special interests.[56]

Brooks was long a supporter of John McCain; however, he disliked McCain's 2008 running mate, Sarah Palin, calling her a "cancer" on the Republican Party.[57] He has referred to her as a "joke", unlikely ever to win the Republican nomination.[58] But he later admitted during a C-SPAN interview that he had gone too far in his previous "cancer" comments about Palin, which he regretted, and simply stated he was not a fan of her values.[59]

In a March 2007 article published in The New York Times titled "No U-Turns",[60] Brooks explained that the Republican Party must distance itself from the minimal-government conservative principles that had arisen during the Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan eras. He claims that these core concepts had served their purposes and should no longer be embraced by Republicans in order to win elections. Alex Pareene commented that Brooks "has been trying for so long to imagine a sensible Republican Party into existence that he can't still think it's going to happen soon."[61]

Brooks has frequently expressed admiration for President Barack Obama. In an August 2009, profile of Brooks, The New Republic describes his first encounter with Obama, in the spring of 2005: "Usually when I talk to senators, while they may know a policy area better than me, they generally don't know political philosophy better than me. I got the sense he knew both better than me. ... I remember distinctly an image of – we were sitting on his couches, and I was looking at his pant leg and his perfectly creased pant, and I'm thinking, a) he's going to be president and b) he'll be a very good president."[62] Brooks appreciates that Obama thinks "like a writer", explaining, "He's a very writerly personality, a little aloof, exasperated. He's calm. He's not addicted to people."[46] Two days after Obama's second autobiography, The Audacity of Hope, hit bookstores, Brooks published a column in The New York Times, titled "Run, Barack, Run", urging the Chicago politician to run for president.[63] However, in December 2011, during a C-SPAN interview, Brooks expressed a more tempered opinion of Obama's presidency, giving Obama only a "B-", and saying that Obama's chances of re-election would be less than 50–50 if elections were held at that time.[64] He stated, "I don't think he's integrated himself with people in Washington as much as he should have."[46] However, in a February 2016 New York Times op-ed, Brooks admitted that he missed Obama during the 2016 primary season, admiring the president's "integrity" and "humanity", among other characteristics.[65]

In writing for The New York Times in January 2010, Brooks described Israel as "an astonishing success story".[66] He wrote that "Jews are a famously accomplished group," who, because they were "forced to give up farming in the Middle Ages ... have been living off their wits ever since".[66] In Brooks' view, "Israel's technological success is the fruition of the Zionist dream. The country was not founded so stray settlers could sit among thousands of angry Palestinians in Hebron. It was founded so Jews would have a safe place to come together and create things for the world."[66][67]

In 2015, Brooks issued his commentary on poverty reform in the United States. His op-ed in The New York Times titled "The Nature of Poverty" specifically followed the social uproar caused by the death of Freddie Gray, and concluded that federal spending is not the issue impeding the progress of poverty reforms, but rather that the impediments to upward mobility are "matters of social psychology".[68] When discussing Gray in particular, Brooks claimed that Gray as a young man was "not on the path to upward mobility".[68]

In regard to the 2016 election, Brooks spoke in support of Hillary Clinton, applauding her ability to be "competent" and "normal" in comparison to her Republican counterpart, Donald Trump.[69][70] In addition, Brooks noted that he believed Clinton would eventually be victorious in the election, as he foresaw that the general American public would become "sick of" Trump.[69][70]

When discussing the political emergence of Trump, Brooks has been strong in his critiques of the candidate, most notably by authoring a New York Times op-ed he titled "No, Not Trump, Not Ever". In this piece, Brooks attacked Trump by arguing he is "epically unprepared to be president" and by pointing out Trump's "steady obliviousness to accuracy".[71]

On the August 9, 2019 episode of the PBS NewsHour, Brooks suggested Trump may be a sociopath.[72]

Social views[]

Brooks opposes what he sees as self-destructive behavior, such as the prevalence of teenage sex and divorce. His view is that "sex is more explicit everywhere barring real life. As the entertainment media have become more sex-saturated, American teenagers have become more sexually abstemious" by "waiting longer to have sex ... [and] having fewer partners". He sees the culture war as nearly over, because "today's young people ... seem happy with the frankness of the left and the wholesomeness of the right." As a result, he is optimistic about the United States' social stability, which he considers to be "in the middle of an amazing moment of improvement and repair".[73]

As early as 2003, Brooks wrote favorably of same-sex marriage, pointing out that marriage is a traditional conservative value. Rather than opposing it, he wrote: "We should insist on gay marriage. We should regard it as scandalous that two people could claim to love each other and not want to sanctify their love with marriage and fidelity ... It's going to be up to conservatives to make the important, moral case for marriage, including gay marriage."[74]

In 2020, Brooks wrote in The Atlantic, under the headline "The Nuclear Family Was a Mistake", that "recent signs suggest at least the possibility that a new family paradigm is emerging," suggesting that in the place of the "collapsed" nuclear one the "extended" family emerges, with "multigenerational living arrangements" that stretch even "across kinship lines."[75] Brooks had already started in 2017 a project called "Weave", in order, as he described it,[75] to "support and draw attention to people and organizations around the country who are building community" and to "repair [America]'s social fabric, which is badly frayed by distrust, division and exclusion."[76]

Brooks also takes a moderate position on abortion, which he thinks should be legal, but with parental consent for minors, during the first four or five months, and illegal afterward, except in extremely rare circumstances.[77]

He has expressed opposition to the legalization of marijuana, stating that use of the drug causes immoral behavior. Brooks relates that he smoked it in his youth but quit after a humiliating incident: Brooks smoked marijuana during lunch hour at school and felt embarrassed during a class presentation that afternoon in which he says he was incapable of intelligible speech.[78]

Criticisms[]

Brooks' writing on sociology has been criticized for being based on stereotypes and presenting false claims as factual. In 2004, Sasha Issenberg, writing for Philadelphia magazine, fact-checked Bobos in Paradise, concluding that many of its comments about middle America were misleading or the exact reverse of the truth.[79] He reported Brooks as insisting that the book was not intended to be factual but to report his impressions of what he believed an area to be like: "He laughed ... '[The book was] partially tongue-in-cheek'...I went through some of the other instances where he made declarations that appeared insupportable. He accused me of being 'too pedantic,' of 'taking all of this too literally,' of 'taking a joke and distorting it.' 'That's totally unethical', he said." Brooks later said the article made him feel that "I suck...I can't remember what I said but my mother told me I was extremely stupid."[7] In 2015, an opinion piece by David Zweig published in Salon found that Brooks had got "nearly every detail" wrong about a poll of high-school students.[80]

Michael Kinsley argued that Brooks was guilty of "fearless generalizing ... Brooks does not let the sociology get in the way of the shtick, and he wields a mean shoehorn when he needs the theory to fit the joke".[81] Writing for Gawker, which consistently criticized Brooks' work, opinion writer Tom Scocca argued that Brooks does not use facts and statistics to support his policy positions, noting "possibly that is because he perceives facts and statistics as an opportunity for dishonest people to work mischief".[82] Furthermore, Annie Lowrey, in writing for the New York magazine, criticized Brooks' statistical methods when arguing his stance on political reform, claiming he used "some very tricksy, misleading math".[83]

Additionally, Sean Illing of Slate criticized the same article from Brooks, claiming he argued his point by framing his sources' arguments out of context and routinely making bold "half-right" assumptions regarding the controversial issue of poverty reform.[84]

In 2016, James Taranto criticized[85] Brooks' analysis[86] of the U.S. Supreme Court case ,[87] writing that "Brooks's treatment of this case is either deliberately deceptive or recklessly ignorant".[85] Law professor Ann Althouse concurred that Brooks "distorts rather grotesquely" the case in question.[clarification needed][88] Brooks was previously criticized by Lyle Denniston with regard to another case, for having "scrambled the actual significance of what the Supreme Court has done".[89]

In 2018 Brooks wrote an article in The New York Times about the generation gap between older and younger Democrats, in which he attributed young Democrats' radicalism to "the cultural Marxism that is now the lingua franca in the elite academy."[90] Brooks was criticized by journalist Ari Paul who claimed that in the article Brooks "rebrands cultural Marxism as mere political correctness, giving the Nazi-inspired phrase legitimacy for the American right. It is dropped in or quoted in other stories—some of them lighthearted, like the fashion cues of the alt-right—without describing how fringe this notion is. It's akin to letting conspiracy theories about chem trails or vaccines get unearned space in mainstream press."[91] Ari Paul and Spencer Sunshine, an associate fellow at the Political Research Associates, concluded that failure to highlight the nature of the Cultural Marxist conspiracy theory "has bitter consequences. 'It is legitimizing the use of that framework, and therefore it's coded antisemitism."[91]

Legacy[]

Sidney Awards[]

In 2004 Brooks created an award to honor the best political and cultural journalism of the year. Named for philosopher Sidney Hook and originally called "The Hookies", the honor was renamed "The Sidney Awards" in 2005. The awards are presented each December.[92]

Personal life[]

Brooks met his first wife, Jane Hughes, while they were students at the University of Chicago. She converted to Judaism[93] and changed her given name to Sarah.[94] In November 2013, they divorced.[95][96] In 2017, Brooks married his former research assistant, writer .[97]

According to The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles, in a September 2014 interview with the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, Brooks said that his oldest son serves in the Israel Defense Forces.[98]

In recent years, Brooks has explored Christianity, although he has not formally converted.[99][100][101][102]

Select bibliography[]

  • Editor, Backward and Upward: The New Conservative Writing (Vintage, 1996) 0-6797-6654-5
  • Bobos in Paradise: The New Upper Class and How They Got There (2000) ISBN 0-684-85377-9
  • On Paradise Drive: How We Live Now (And Always Have) in the Future Tense (2004) ISBN 0-7432-2738-7
  • The Social Animal: The Hidden Sources of Love, Character, and Achievement (2011) ISBN 978-1-4000-6760-2
  • The Road to Character (Random House, 2015) ISBN 978-0-8129-9325-7
  • The Second Mountain: The Quest for a Moral Life (Random House, 2019) ISBN 978-0-8-1299-3264

See also[]

References[]

  1. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e "David Brooks Biography". PBS NewsHour. Archived from the original on December 20, 2011.
  2. ^ Eberstadt, Mary (ed.), "Why I turned right: leading baby boom conservatives chronicle their political journeys", Simon and Schuster (2007).
  3. ^ "NY Times's David Brooks: GOP under Trump is harming every cause it claims to serve". The Hill.
  4. ^ Jump up to: a b Columnist Biography: David Brooks, The New York Times
  5. ^ Jump up to: a b Felsenthal, Carol (May 18, 2015). "David Brooks Doesn't Pay Attention to Your Criticism". Chicago. Retrieved February 14, 2016.
  6. ^ Brooks, David (April 16, 2009). "A Loud and Promised Land". The New York Times. As an American Jew, I was taught to go all gooey-eyed at the thought of Israel ...
  7. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f Beam, Christopher (July 4, 2010). "A Reasonable Man". New York magazine. Retrieved November 14, 2014. His wife is devoutly Jewish—she converted after they married and recently changed her name from Jane Hughes to the more biblical-sounding Sarah Brooks—but he rarely attends synagogue.
  8. ^ University of Chicago Maroon, April 5, 1983.
  9. ^ Yoe, Mary Ruth (February 2004). "Everybody's a Critic". University of Chicago Magazine. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago.
  10. ^ "The Social Animal: The Hidden Sources of Love, Character and Achievement". randomhouse.com.
  11. ^ Brooks, David (January 17, 2011). "Social Animal How the new sciences of human nature can help make sense of a life". The New Yorker. New York City: Condé Nast. Retrieved March 13, 2011.
  12. ^ Bell, Douglas (March 11, 2011). "The Social Animal: The Hidden Sources of Love, Character, and Achievement, by David Brooks". The Globe and Mail. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: The Woodbridge Company. Retrieved August 8, 2017.
  13. ^ Nagel, Thomas (March 11, 2011). "David Brooks's Theory of Human Nature". The New York Times. New York City. Retrieved August 8, 2017.
  14. ^ Myers, PZ (March 11, 2011). "David Brooks' dream world for the trust-fund set". Salon.com. San Francisco, California: Salon Media Group. Archived from the original on March 8, 2011. Retrieved March 16, 2011.
  15. ^ Wilkinson, Will (March 10, 2011). "The Social Animal by David Brooks: A Scornful Review". Forbes. New York City. Retrieved March 16, 2011.
  16. ^ "Nonfiction Book Review: The Social Animal: A Story of Love, Character, and Achievement by David Brooks". Publishers Weekly. New York City: PWxyz, LLC. January 31, 2011. Retrieved August 8, 2017.
  17. ^ Atlas, James (February 27, 2011). "Brooks Explores Human Nature in 'The Social Animal'". Newsweek. Retrieved August 8, 2017.
  18. ^ Kirkus Reviews (January 15, 2011). "Book Review: The Social Animal". Retrieved August 8, 2017. Cite magazine requires |magazine= (help)
  19. ^ Gilman, Susan J. (March 4, 2011). "David Brooks' Smart, Messy Theory Of Everything". NPR. Retrieved August 8, 2017.
  20. ^ Rogers, Ben (May 22, 2011). "The Social Animal by David Brooks – review". The Guardian. London, England: Guardian Media Group. Retrieved August 8, 2017.
  21. ^ Crouch, Andy (March 8, 2011). "Review: The Social Animal". Christianity Today. Carol Steam, Illinois: Christianity Today International. Retrieved August 8, 2017.
  22. ^ "Book review: The Social Animal by David Brooks". The Scotsman. Edinburgh, Scotland: JPIMedia. June 27, 2011. Retrieved August 8, 2017.
  23. ^ Beckett, Andy (May 1, 2011). "The Social Animal by David Brooks – review". The Guardian. London, England: Guardian Media Group. Retrieved August 8, 2017.
  24. ^ Bloom, Paul (March 11, 2011). "'The Social Animal' by David Brooks, examines emotion vs. reason". The Washington Post. Washington, D.C.: Nash Holdings. Retrieved August 8, 2017.
  25. ^ Wolfe, Alan (March 2, 2011). "Studies Show". The New Republic. Retrieved August 8, 2017.
  26. ^ "Publishers Weekly Best-sellers". The Maui News. April 3, 2011. Retrieved April 4, 2011.
  27. ^ Brooks, David (February 4, 2007). "Children of Polarization". The New York Times.
  28. ^ Harrington, Rebecca (December 19, 2012). "David Brooks To Teach 'Humility' At Yale". The Huffington Post. New York City: Huffington Post Media Group.
  29. ^ Wood, Becky (June 15, 2012). "Five new members elected to University of Chicago Board of Trustees". uChicago News. Retrieved February 13, 2016.
  30. ^ "Board of Advisors". The University of Chicago Institute of Politics. Retrieved February 13, 2016.
  31. ^ https://www.ted.com/playlists/728/the_most_popular_talks_of_2019
  32. ^ Vespa, Matt (June 20, 2017). "NYT Brooks: I'm Worried We're Getting Ahead Of Ourselves With This Russian Collusion Stuff". Townhall.com.
  33. ^ Chang, Clio (November 29, 2016). "The center of American politics will always have David Brooks". The New Republic.
  34. ^ "Sorry, David Brooks, but we can't blame Trump's ascendance on "anti-politics" — it's ..." Salon.com. San Francisco, California: Salon Media Group. February 29, 2016.
  35. ^ "David Brooks". Biography In Context: Contemporary Authors Online. Detroit, Michigan: Gale. 2012. Missing or empty |url= (help)
  36. ^ Scarry, Eddie (March 18, 2016). "NYT columnist David Brooks admits he's 'not socially intermingled' with Trump supporters". Washington Examiner. Washington, D.C.: MediaDC.
  37. ^ "The rise of collectivist conservatives". The Week. New York City: Dennis Publishing. May 19, 2009.
  38. ^ "Anti-Anti-Trumpism Is the Glue Holding Together the Republican Party".
  39. ^ Bennett, Kate (April 16, 2015). "David Brooks' Muse?". Politico. Arlington, Virginia: Capitol News Company.
  40. ^ Black, Eric (May 17, 2017). "Chaos president indeed — and David Brooks has some ideas about why". MinnPost.
  41. ^ Gauger, Jeff (August 5, 2017). "New York columnist riffs on middle age from Shreveport". Shreveport Times. Shreveport, Louisiana: Gannett.
  42. ^ "A hesitant radical in the age of Trump: David Brooks and the search for moderation". New Statesman.
  43. ^ Fisher, Marc (January 7, 2016). "The Evolution of David Brooks". Moment Magazine.
  44. ^ Warren, David (July 17, 2009). "A War Between Two World Views". Real Clear Politics.
  45. ^ Jump up to: a b Kurtz, Howard (September 30, 2012). "David Brooks, Riling Up the Right". The Daily Beast. New York City: IAC.
  46. ^ Jump up to: a b c Weiland, Noah (October 4, 2013). "Uncommon Interview: David Brooks (A.B. '83)". The Chicago Maroon. Retrieved February 13, 2016.
  47. ^ Yoe, Mary Ruth (February 2004). "Everybody's a critic". University of Chicago Magazine. 96 (3). Retrieved September 11, 2009.
  48. ^ Brooks, David (March 9, 2003). "The Certainty Crisis". The Weekly Standard. Washington, D.C.: Clarity Media Group. Archived from the original on April 8, 2003. Retrieved February 17, 2015.
  49. ^ Brooks, David (April 28, 2003). "The Collapse of the Dream Palaces". The Weekly Standard. Washington, D.C.: Clarity Media Group. Retrieved February 17, 2015.
  50. ^ Brooks, David (November 3, 2005). "The Harry da Reid Code". The New York Times. New York City.
  51. ^ Chait, Jonathan (May 18, 2008). "Was the Iraq War a Crime or a Mistake? Yes". New York. New York City: New York Media.
  52. ^ Mitchell, Greg (March 25, 2008). "David Brooks: No Apologies 5 Years Later". Huffington Post. New York City.
  53. ^ Jump up to: a b c d Brooks, David (May 19, 2015). "Learning From Mistakes". The New York Times. New York City.
  54. ^ Brooks, David (July 4, 2007). "Ending the Farce". The New York Times. New York City. Retrieved March 11, 2011.
  55. ^ Sullivan, Andrew (July 3, 2007). "What Rule of Law?". The Atlantic Monthly. Boston, Massachusetts: Emerson Collective. Retrieved March 11, 2011.
  56. ^ Brooks, David (August 10, 2006). "Party No. 3". The New York Times. New York City. p. A23. Retrieved October 13, 2017.
  57. ^ Shea, Danny (October 8, 2008). "David Brooks: Sarah Palin "Represents A Fatal Cancer To The Republican Party"". The Huffington Post. New York City: Huffington Post Media Group. Retrieved February 16, 2009.
  58. ^ David Brooks: Sarah Palin Is A 'Joke', TPMTv on YouTube, November 15, 2009
  59. ^ "In Depth with David Brooks". C-SPAN. December 4, 2011. Retrieved April 25, 2015. Host: Does David regret his comment about Sarah Palin and her cancer on the Republican party? Brooks: Yeah, I do. I think it was some lunch affair for some magazine, and I was just mouthing off, and so I – I'm not a fan of hers, but that's a little strong.
  60. ^ Brooks, David (March 3, 2007). "No U-Turns". The New York Times. New York City. Retrieved September 13, 2008.
  61. ^ Pareene, Alex (April 22, 2014). "Blow up the Times Op-Ed page, and start again!". Salon. San Francisco, California: Salon Media Group. Retrieved August 15, 2015.
  62. ^ Sherman, Gabriel (August 31, 2009). "The Courtship: The story behind the Obama-Brooks bromance". The New Republic. Retrieved September 11, 2009.
  63. ^ Brooks, David (October 19, 2006). "Run, Barack, Run". The New York Times. New York City. Retrieved September 11, 2009.
  64. ^ "In Depth with David Brooks". C-SPAN. December 4, 2011. Retrieved April 25, 2015. Host: So how is the president doing? Brooks: You know, I think I'm a little disappointed that he didn't do Simpson-Bowles. I was a little disappointed in the way the debt has run up, and I don't blame him for running up the debt in the recession, but I think we needed an exit strategy to get out of it. I think he could have done a little more to promote growth, though I think given all the bad things it was going to be tough no matter who was president, no matter who did anything, it was going to be tough to promote growth. So I don't particularly blame him for that. I think he's conducted himself in pretty much an honest way. He's had very little corruption. I still have great personal admiration for him. I'm more to his right, but I give him no worse than a B-. I think he's made some mistakes, but i wouldn't say he's been a bad president.
  65. ^ Brooks, David (February 9, 2016). "I Miss Barack Obama". The New York Times. New York City.
  66. ^ Jump up to: a b c Brooks, David (January 12, 2010). "The Tel Aviv Cluster". The New York Times. New York City.
  67. ^ Maltz Bovy, Phoebe. "David Brooks Was Right: Anti-Semitism Is a Different Evil". The New Republic. Retrieved August 15, 2015.
  68. ^ Jump up to: a b Brooks, David (May 1, 2015). "The Nature of Poverty". The New York Times. New York City.
  69. ^ Jump up to: a b Schwartz, Ian (June 11, 2016). "David Brooks: People Will Be Sick Of Trump And Vote For Hillary, "She Will be Competent And Normal"". Real Clear Politics. Retrieved September 20, 2016.
  70. ^ Jump up to: a b PBS News Hour. "Shields and Brooks on 'anticlimactic' Clinton victory, Trump's 'moral chasm'." Online video clip. YouTube. YouTube, June 10, 2016. Web. September 20, 2016.
  71. ^ Brooks, David (March 18, 2016). "No, Not Trump, Not Ever". The New York Times. New York City. Retrieved September 20, 2016.
  72. ^ "David Brooks and Jonathan Capehart on Trump's mass shooting response (Read the Full Transcript)". pbs.org. August 9, 2019. Retrieved August 10, 2019. And I look at that photo, I think, well, he's a sociopath. He's incapable of experiencing or showing empathy.
  73. ^ The New York Times, April 17, 2005, 4–14
  74. ^ Brooks, David (November 22, 2003). "The Power Of Marriage". The New York Times. Retrieved May 19, 2017.
  75. ^ Jump up to: a b Brooks, David (March 2020). "The Nuclear Family Was a Mistake". The Atlantic. Boston, Massachusetts: Emerson Collective. Retrieved February 22, 2020.
  76. ^ "Weave: The Social Fabric Project". The Aspen Institute. Retrieved February 22, 2020.
  77. ^ Brooks, David (April 22, 2007). "Postures in Public, Facts in the Womb". The New York Times. New York City. Retrieved December 31, 2009.
  78. ^ Brooks, David (January 2, 2014). "Weed: Been There. Done That". The New York Times. New York City.
  79. ^ Issenberg, Sasha (April 1, 2004). "Boo-Boos in Paradise". Philadelphia. Retrieved November 14, 2014.
  80. ^ Zweig, David (June 15, 2015). "The facts vs. David Brooks: Startling inaccuracies raise questions about his latest book". Salon. San Francisco, California: Salon Media Group. Retrieved August 15, 2015.
  81. ^ Kinsley, Michael (May 23, 2004). "Suburban Thrall". The New York Times. New York City. Retrieved November 14, 2014.
  82. ^ Scocca, Tom. "David Brooks Has Noticed Hillary Is a Soviet Dictator". Gawker. New York City: Bustle Digital Group. Archived from the original on August 15, 2015. Retrieved August 15, 2015.
  83. ^ Lowery, Annie (May 1, 2015). "David Brooks Is Not Buying Your Excuses, Poor People". New York. New York City: New York Media. Retrieved September 20, 2016.
  84. ^ Illing, Sean (May 1, 2015). "Why David Brooks Shouldn't Talk About Poor People". Slate. New York City: The Slate Group. Retrieved September 20, 2016.
  85. ^ Jump up to: a b Taranto, James (January 12, 2016). "Brooks Borks Cruz". The Wall Street Journal. New York City: Dow Jones & Company.
  86. ^ Brooks, David (January 12, 2016). "The Brutalism of Ted Cruz". The New York Times. New York City.
  87. ^ Dretke v. Haley, 541 U.S. 386 (2004).
  88. ^ Althouse, Ann. "Althouse" (January 13, 2016).
  89. ^ Denniston, Lyle (May 7, 2012). "Constitution Check: Did the Supreme Court give us Super PACs?". Constitution Daily.
  90. ^ Brooks, David (November 26, 2018). "Liberal Parents, Radical Children". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 27, 2018. Retrieved January 22, 2021.
  91. ^ Jump up to: a b Paul, Ari (June 4, 2019). "'Cultural Marxism': The Mainstreaming of a Nazi Trope". Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. Archived from the original on October 22, 2020. Retrieved October 24, 2020.
  92. ^ Brooks, David (December 29, 2005). "The Sidney Awards, 2005". The New York Times. Retrieved December 30, 2014.
  93. ^ "The Times' 'New York Conservative'". The Jewish Week.
  94. ^ Brooks, Sarah (June 19, 2008). "What's in a name? In part, my religion". Washington Jewish Week. Archived from the original on June 10, 2014.
  95. ^ "Love, etc.: David Brooks and Sarah Brooks divorce". The Washington Post. November 18, 2013. Retrieved May 3, 2017.
  96. ^ Lamb, Brian (February 8, 2015). "Q&A with David Brooks". C-SPAN. Retrieved May 3, 2017. (40:42) Lamb: Are you divorced or not? Brooks: I am divorced, yes. And I don't want to personally, I don't want to legally, talk about it, but yes, I am divorced. ... I do believe in marriage, mine didn't work out, I desperately want to get married to somebody.
  97. ^ Heil, Emily (April 30, 2017). "New York Times columnist David Brooks weds his former researcher Anne Snyder". The Washington Post. Washington, D.C.: Nash Holdings. Retrieved May 3, 2017.
  98. ^ Esham, Rob (September 23, 2014). "David Brooks' Son Is In the Israeli Army: Does It Matter?". Jewish Journal. Retrieved September 25, 2014.
  99. ^ Wallace-Wells, Benjamin (April 29, 2019). "David Brooks's Conversion Story". The New Yorker. New York City: Condé Nast.
  100. ^ Smith, Christian T. (June 3, 2019). "How David Brooks Meandered Toward God". Christianity Today.
  101. ^ McGarvey, Bill (September 16, 2019). "David Brooks on his life-changing pilgrimage with St. Augustine and Dorothy Day". America.
  102. ^ Wehner, Peter (May 7, 2019). "David Brooks's Journey Toward Faith". The Atlantic. Boston, Massachusetts: Emerson Collective.

External links[]

Retrieved from ""