Dictee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For the French or Korean dictation exercise "Dictée", see Dictation (exercise).
Dictee
Dictee (Cha, 1982).jpg
1st ed, Tanam Press (1982)
AuthorTheresa Hak Kyung Cha
LanguageEnglish, French
Subjecta classic work of autobiography
Published1982
PublisherTanam Press
Media typesoftcover
Pages179
ISBN978-0-934378-09-3

Dictee is a 1982 book by Korean American author Theresa Hak Kyung Cha. Considered to be Cha's magnum opus, the book, a genre-bending poetry collection, focuses on several women: the Korean revolutionary Yu Guan Soon, Joan of Arc, Saint Thérèse of Lisieux, Demeter and Persephone, Cha's mother Hyun Soon Huo, and Cha herself. All these women are linked by their struggles and the way that nations have affected and twisted their lives.

Publication history[]

The book was first published in 1982, the year Cha was murdered. The book was out of print for a while, but due in part to the publication of an edited collection on her novel, Writing Self, Writing Nation (1994), Cha's work began to receive critical attention. In 1997, with the resurgence of Asian American studies and Third-wave feminism, the book was brought back into print by Norma Alarcón and Third Woman Press.[1]

  • — (1982). Dictee (1st, pb ed.). New York: Tanam Press. ISBN 9780934378109.
  • — (1994). Dictee. Berkeley: Third Woman Press. ISBN 978-0-943219-12-7.
  • — (2001). Dictee. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-23112-2.
  • — (2009). Dictee (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-26129-7.

Genre[]

Critics[who?] contend that Dictee, though considered a novel, is difficult to define by genre. It has an unorthodox structure, and consists of descriptions of the struggle to speak, uncaptioned photographs, tellings of the lives of saints and patriots, and mysterious letters that seem not to relate to the other material. Cha "borrows from avant garde and film editing techniques such as jagged cuts, jump shots, and visual exposition", based on her experience in the video and performing arts.[2] The work "deviates from genres, themes, and styles" and fails to fit a single descriptor or label with clarity.[3] It has been described as auto-ethnography, due to its highly subjective view of heritage and the past. "It is part autobiography, part biography, part personal diary, part ethnography, part auto-ethnography, part translation. And all these genres are presented with an intertextual mix of photographs, quotations, translations, and language so as to create a history. Cha's move in Dictee is to collage multiple voices American, European, and Asian---so as to build a history".[4] Cha uses a lot of photographs to engage the reader and create a certain atmosphere. Dictee is composed of various genres, such as autobiography, fiction, history, and poetry and this diversity not only reflects on genre, but also on culture and language.

Cha criticizes the prejudice towards and oppression of women, which greatly affects the genre. She “not only challenge[s] the traditional autobiographic ethnic mode, it also disturbs the reader’s expectations by breaking down the boundaries between genres and playing with them”.[5] In other words, Cha creates a pathetic atmosphere in irony. Erotic narrations disclose the inequity in society and reveal Cha's strong resistance. What her goes through is shown in aesthetic forms that eulogize the female characteristics. In addition, her fragmented memories suggest her ambiguous Korean identity and inner loss. In all, her depictions are shaped by and shape genre.

Structure and critical observations[]

Dictee is organized into nine parts, a structure that arises from the nine Greek muses. These include Clio, Calliope, Urania, Melpomene, Erato, Elitere, Thalia, Terpischore, and Polymnia. The nine muses are the titles of nine chapters of Dictee. Cha's use of nine muses is derived from Hesiod, who first used them. But Cha's employment is a subversive revision because of her "feminist intervention and patriarchal order." The catalogue of nine muses Cha examines with nine women characters, vary widely from "Greek goddesses to a Korean shamanistic matriarch and from historical figures to fictional ones".[6] The meaning of the muses is shown with nine women who all reject patriarchal roles and cannot have a voice for themselves for different reasons, because of unhappy marriage, exile, turbulence and immigration. At the end of chapter "POLYMNIA SACRED POETRY", Cha writes "Tenth, a Circle within a circle, a series of concentric circles"(Cha 175). Cha uses this image to describe how the women always come together and the child becomes the mother and the mother will have a child and it is like a circle, a life circle for women. At the same time, trauma from the mother's generation is always passed on to the next generation. So this circle is both physical and mental.

The novel is mainly written in English and French, but some Korean and Chinese characters can be seen in the pictures posed to support the text. Unexplained Chinese characters as well as Korean words lead incomprehension visually and linguistically. Cha wants to keeps a realist ideal of equivalence and deliberately get rid of the sense of foreignness without extra translation, though these characters stand outside the textual order, instead, they create "self-contained diatinction and feeling of otherness".[7] Cha didn't want to disturb readers’ reading experience by doing this—on the contrary, she wanted the readers to join her. The process of reading this book was to call on Korean people to resist the colony of Japan. So this book could be called a book with history of blood and tears.

The stories of the women in the book (including Yu Guan Soon, Joan of Arc, Saint Thérèse of Lisieux, and her mother Hyun Soon Huo) focus on patriotism and exile identity. Cha's purpose of using multimedia and how do visual elements is to attract the readers' attention in different approaches. Focusing on the photograph of Cha's biological mother, Hyung Soon Huo, though it is uncaptioned, it conveys the ways the past that speaks to "escape the capture of discursive language" with this historical character. And in a deep sense, it also "clear a way for what Dictée understands as the necessary reply to not repeat history in oblivion".[8] She also uses a still from the silent French movie called The Passion of Joan of Arc to give the readers a direct concept of what is going on in the text. So readers could think about the reliability of narration and focalization,[9] multimedia and art,[10][11] the ambiguity[12] and authenticity in photography taking,[13] and the boundary between fiction and nonfiction.[14]

Critics have read the book as a social discourse, aiming at informing the readers of the world about the history of the Japanese Colonial Period.[15] The trauma suggested is also the product of nationalism, patriarchal forces, and colonialism during that period.[16] What's more, it also shows the struggles that the Asian American have been through in the aspect of the culture identity. Cha managed to call public's attention to this kind of special group, at the same time, it also let the people who have the same experience or culture background find their own culture identity.

Dictée is famous for its unique print format and typographic design, using untranslated French, Korean, Chinese, collage and fragmented text in the book. Not only the title of the book is dictation, but many of the contents of the book are also written in strict accordance with the dictation format. Cha's Dictée carries it out of melancholia into mourning, by working through multiple personal and political traumas as an outstanding work of postmodernity.

Reviews and criticism[]

Reviews for Dictee have been rather positive, with Carole Maso quoted in Spin Magazine commenting, "Dictee enlarges the notion of what a book is...because it is ephemeral, fragile, fierce, and indelible, because it is subversive, because it yearns and is luminous."[17]

Historical context[]

Dictee mainly embodies two periods, The Japanese Colony (1910-1945) and Liberation, Division and The Korea War (1945-1953).

In 1919, Korea active nationalists drafted and distributed a declaration of independence of Korea and planned a large demonstration of independence. To gather a large number of people into demonstration, they turned the funeral for King Kojong into a protest against Japanese. "Demonstrations supporting the declaration of independence quickly spread throughout the country. It is estimated that more than a million of Korea's 20 million people participated in street demonstrations."[18] This movement is called March 1st Movement. Women and Children were beaten and killed by the police and soldiers. Yu Guan Soon, who was a student of Korea and an organizer of March 1 Movement. She "passed out copies of the declaration and led demonstrations in her hometown area south of Seoul. She was arrested, imprisoned, and tortured, and after a year she died in prison."[18]

Japan used a variety of policies to control and assimilate Korea since 1930s, especially through education policies. "In 1934 Ugaki introduced a new curriculum in Korean schools that featured increased instruction in Japanese language, ethics, and history. The new curriculum eliminated the study of Korean and the use of Korean in general instruction. Eventually, the colonial government would insist that only the Japanese language be used in all public offices, and by the 1940s all businesses and banks were forced to keep records exclusively in Japanese."[18]

After the end of World War II, Japan lost the war and control of Korea, Korea was free from Japanese occupation. However, Soviet and U.S. troops moved into Korea from north and south, they occupied Korea after Japan left. "The responsible bodies in Washington suggested to the President that the Japanese forces north of the 38th parallel surrender to the Soviet forces and those south of the 38th parallel surrender to the US forces. The two colonels who had prepared the decisions — one of them being the later Secretary of State Dean Rusk — had chosen the 38th parallel because it left the capital Seoul under US control.3 This line had already been mentioned in internal dis-cussions of the US military at Potsdam when they had envisaged the military occupation of Korea for the first time. The suggestion to choose the 38th parallel as dividing line became part of an instruction, approved by the Presi-dent, to General MacArthur, Commander-in-Chief of the Allied Forces. This instruction was also communicated to the British and Soviet government." "The 38th parallel was considered to be a temporary line to fix military responsibilities. Therefore, it has been called a "military expedient". Yet, once Soviet troops had entered the northern part of Korea, facts were established which could not be removed."[19] Two different governments were established under Soviet and U.S.'s support, and they had a few conflicts after establishment. June 25, 1950, the Korean War started. North Korean Army with China's help and South Korea Army with U.S.'s help started a war in Korea Peninsula. The war ended on July 27, 1953.

References[]

  1. ^ Lewallen, Constance (2001). The Dream of The Audience: Theresa Hak Kyung Cha (1951 -1982). University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-23287-7.[page needed]
  2. ^ Cheng, Anne Anlin (2001). The Melancholy of Race. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-515162-6.[page needed]
  3. ^ Yi Kang, Hyun; Kim, Elaine H.; Lowe, Lisa; Sunn Wong, Shelley (1994). Writing Self, Writing Nation: A Collection of Essays on Dictee by Theresa Hak Kyung Cha. Third Women Press. ISBN 978-0-943219-11-0. Retrieved 10 July 2018.
  4. ^ Spahr, Juliana M. (1996). "Postmodernism, Readers, and Theresa Hak Kyung Cha's 'Dictee'". College Literature. 23 (3): 23–43. JSTOR 25112272.
  5. ^ Parker, Adele; Young, Stephenie (2013). Transnationalism and Resistance: Experience and Experiment in Women's Writing. Rodopi. p. 122. ISBN 978-94-012-0890-1.
  6. ^ Lee, Kun Jong (2006). "Rewriting Hesiod, Revisioning Korea:Theresa Hak Kyung Cha's Dictee is a Subversive Hesiodic Catalogue of Women". College Literature. 33 (3): 77–99. doi:10.1353/lit.2006.0040.
  7. ^ Sue-Im Lee (2002). "Suspicious Characters: Realism, Asian American Identity, and Theresa Hak Kyung Cha's Dictee". Journal of Narrative Theory. 32 (2): 227–258. doi:10.1353/jnt.2011.0065. S2CID 163149394.
  8. ^ Kim, Hyo K. (2013). "Embodying the In-Between: Theresa Hak Kyung Cha's Dictee". Mosaic. 46 (4): 127–143. doi:10.1353/mos.2013.0041. S2CID 144019120.
  9. ^ Diengott, Nilli (1995). "Narration and focalization: the implications for the issue of reliability in narrative". Journal of Literary Semantics. 24 (1): 42–49. doi:10.1515/jlse.1995.24.1.42. INIST:3725010.
  10. ^ Morrison, K. A. (2004). "Theresa Hak Kyung Cha, D.G. Rossetti, and the 'Art of the Book': A Note on Dictee". Notes on Contemporary Literature. 34 (2): 9–11.
  11. ^ Paulson, Sarah J.; Malvik, Anders Skare, eds. (2016). Literature in Contemporary Media Culture: Technology - Subjectivity- Aesthetics. John Benjamins Publishing Company. ISBN 978-90-272-6754-2.[page needed]
  12. ^ Kim, Sue J. (2008). "Narrator, Author, Reader: Equivocation in Theresa Hak Kyung Cha's Dictee". Narrative. 16 (2): 163–177. doi:10.1353/nar.0.0002. JSTOR 30219281. S2CID 146476662. Gale A178674400 Project MUSE 237017.
  13. ^ "Descriptive Images: Authenticity and Illusion in Early and Contemporary Photography". Description in Literature and Other Media. 2007. pp. 289–316. doi:10.1163/9789401205214_010. ISBN 978-90-420-2310-9.
  14. ^ Paulson, Sarah J.; Malvik, Anders Skare, eds. (2016). Literature in Contemporary Media Culture: Technology - Subjectivity- Aesthetics. John Benjamins Publishing Company. ISBN 978-90-272-6754-2.[page needed]
  15. ^ Cheng, Anne Anlin (1998). "Memory and Anti-Documentary Desire in Theresa Hak Kyung Cha's Dictée". Melus. 23 (4): 119–133. doi:10.2307/467831. JSTOR 467831. Gale A55909805.
  16. ^ Chambers, Evan (2012). "Re-opening Dictée: interpreting the void in Theresa Cha's representations of Christianity". Religion & Literature. 44 (2): 123–146. JSTOR 24397672.
  17. ^ Bell, Madison Smartt (January 1996). "My Back Pages". SPIN. p. 92. Retrieved 25 February 2016.
  18. ^ a b c Peterson, Mark (2009). A brief History of Korea. Facts On File. ISBN 978-1-4381-2738-5.[page needed]
  19. ^ Kleiner, Jurgen (2001). Korea: A Century of Change. River Edge, N.J.: World Scientific. pp. 49–50. ISBN 978-981-02-4657-0.

External links[]

Retrieved from ""