Discursive dominance
This article has multiple issues. Please help or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
The word discursive is closely related to the word discourse, which refers to "communication of ideas". In a society there are competing discourses (or narratives) regarding anything and everything such as feminism, racism, casteism, communalism, regionalism, economic development, democracy, governance, etc. These competing discourses struggle for dominance. Ultimately, one of the discourse emerges as dominant. This is known as discursive dominance.
According to Chanchal Kumar Sharma (2011, 169) 'A dominant discourse is a winning discursive formation. A complete consensus is not necessary, though. It is the one that survives the widest range of criticisms in various forums and media.'[1]
See also[]
- ^ Sharma, Chanchal Kumar (2011-04-01). "A Discursive Dominance Theory of Economic Reform Sustainability: The Case of India". India Review. 10 (2): 126–184. doi:10.1080/14736489.2011.574550. ISSN 1473-6489.
Further reading[]
- Dryzek, John S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198295075.
- Fisher, Frank (2003). Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 182–86. ISBN 978-0199242634.[failed verification]
- Sharma, Chanchal Kumar (2011). "Discursive Dominance Theory of Economic Reform Sustainability". India Review. 10 (2): 126–184. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.627.2831. doi:10.1080/14736489.2011.574550.
Categories:
- Discourse analysis
- Sociology stubs