This article has multiple issues. Please help or discuss these issues on the . (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations.(May 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please to make it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details.(May 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
(Learn how and when to remove this template message)
In the field of topology, a Fréchet–Urysohn space is a topological space with the property that for every subset the closure of in is identical to the sequential closure of in
Fréchet–Urysohn spaces are a special type of sequential space.
Fréchet–Urysohn spaces are the most general class of spaces for which sequences suffice to determine all topological properties of subsets of the space.
That is, Fréchet–Urysohn spaces are exactly those spaces for which knowledge of which sequences converge to which limits (and which sequences do not) suffices to completely determine the space's topology.
Every Fréchet–Urysohn space is a sequential space but not conversely.
Suppose that is any subset of
A sequence is eventually in if there exists a positive integer such that for all indices
The set is called sequentially open if every sequence in that converges to a point of is eventually in ;
Typically, if is understood then is written in place of
The set is called sequentially closed if or equivalently, if whenever is a sequence in converging to then must also be in
The complement of a sequentially open set is a sequentially closed set, and vice versa.
Let
denote the set of all sequentially open subsets of where this may be denoted by is the topology is understood.
The set is a topology on that is finer than the original topology
Every open (resp. closed) subset of is sequentially open (resp. sequentially closed), which implies that
Strong Fréchet–Urysohn space[]
A topological space is a strong Fréchet–Urysohn space if for every point and every sequence of subsets of the space such that there exist a sequence in such that for every and in
The above properties can be expressed as selection principles.
Contrast to sequential spaces[]
Every open subset of is sequentially open and every closed set is sequentially closed.
However, the converses are in general not true.
The spaces for which the converses are true are called sequential spaces;
that is, a sequential space is a topological space in which every sequentially open subset is necessarily open, or equivalently, it is a space in which every sequentially closed subset is necessarily closed.
Every Fréchet-Urysohn space is a sequential space but there are sequential spaces that are not Fréchet-Urysohn spaces.
Sequential spaces (resp. Fréchet-Urysohn spaces) can be viewed/interpreted as exactly those spaces where for any single given subset knowledge of which sequences in converge to which point(s) of (and which do not) is sufficient to determine whether or not is closed in (resp. suffices to determine the closure of in ).[note 1]
Thus sequential spaces are those spaces for which sequences in can be used as a "test" to determine whether or not any given subset is open (or equivalently, closed) in ; or said differently, sequential spaces are those spaces whose topologies can be completely characterized in terms of sequence convergence.
In any space that is not sequential, there exists a subset for which this "test" gives a "false positive."[note 2]
Characterizations[]
If is a topological space then the following are equivalent:
is a Fréchet–Urysohn space.
Definition: for every subset
for every subset
This statement is equivalent to the definition above because always holds for every
For any subset that is not closed in and for every there exists a sequence in that converges to
Contrast this condition to the following characterization of a sequential space:
For any subset that is not closed in there exists some for which there exists a sequence in that converges to [1]
This characterization implies that every Fréchet–Urysohn space is a sequential space.
The characterization below shows that from among Hausdorff sequential spaces, Fréchet–Urysohn spaces are exactly those for which a "cofinal convergent diagonal sequence" can always be found, similar to the diagonal principal that is used to characterize topologies in terms of convergent nets. This "diagonal sequence" can also be seen as a topological analog that is similar in form to the diagonal sequence that appears in diagonalization arguments, except that some sequences might be "skipped" by the diagonal sequence. In the following characterization, all convergence is assumed to take place in
If is a sequence with an infinite image (or "range") that converge to some and if for every is a sequence that converges to where these hypotheses can be summarized by the following diagram
then there exist maps with strictly increasing such that
Because a sequence in is by definition just a map of the form the sequence "having an infinite image" means precisely that the set is infinite. If does not have this property then it is necessarily eventually constant with value in which case the existence of the maps with the desired properties is readily verified for this special case (even if is not a Fréchet–Urysohn space).
Statement (2) but with the additional requirement that also be strictly increasing.
In short, this condition guarantees that if and if for every then there exists a subsequence of the net that converges to (here, "subsequence" means a subnet that is also a sequence). Compare this statement to the diagonal principal used to define topologies in terms of nets. Importantly, there is in general no guarantee that the net will converge to (or even to any point at all).
Statement (3) but with the additional requirement that
Properties[]
Every Fréchet–Urysohn space is a sequential space although the opposite implication is not true in general.[2][3]
Every first-countable space is a Fréchet–Urysohn space. Consequently, every second-countable space, every metrizable space, and every pseudometrizable space is a Fréchet–Urysohn space. It also follows that every topological space on a finite set is a Fréchet–Urysohn space.
Direct limit of finite-dimensional Euclidean spaces
The space of finite real sequences is a Hausdorff sequential space that is not Fréchet–Urysohn.
For every integer identify with the set where the latter is a subset of the space of sequences of real numbers explicitly, the elements and are identified together.
In particular, can be identified as a subset of and more generally, as a subset for any integer Let
Give its usual topology in which a subset is open (resp. closed) if and only if for every integer the set is an open (resp. closed) subset of (with it usual Euclidean topology).
If and is a sequence in then in if and only if there exists some integer such that both and are contained in and in
From these facts, it follows that is a sequential space.
For every integer let denote the open ball in of radius (in the Euclidean norm) centered at the origin.
Let
Then the closure of is is all of but the origin of does not belong to the sequential closure of in
In fact, it can be shown that
This proves that is not a Fréchet–Urysohn space.
Montel DF-spaces
Every infinite-dimensional MontelDF-space is a sequential space but not a Fréchet–Urysohn space.
The following extensively used spaces are prominent examples of sequential spaces that are not Fréchet–Urysohn spaces.
Let denote the Schwartz space and let denote the space of smooth functions on an open subset where both of these spaces have their usual Fréchet space topologies, as defined in the article about distributions.
Both and as well as the strong dual spaces of both these of spaces, are completenuclearMontelultrabornological spaces, which implies that all four of these locally convex spaces are also paracompact[6]normalreflexivebarrelled spaces. The strong dual spaces of both and are sequential spaces but neither one of these duals is a Fréchet-Urysohn space.[7][8]
See also[]
Axioms of countability
First-countable space – Topological space where each point has a countable neighbourhood basis
^Of course, if you could use this knowledge to determine all of the sets in that are closed in then you could determine the closure of Because of this, the interpretation that was given assumes that you make this determination of "is the set closed" is only applied the given set and not to any other subsets; said differently, you cannot apply this "test" to infinitely many subsets simultaneously (e.g. you can not use something akin to the axiom of choice). It is in Fréchet-Urysohn spaces that the closure of a set can be determined without it ever being necessary to consider any subset of other than
^Although this "test" (which attempts to answer "is this set open (resp. closed)?") could potentially give a "false positive," it can never give a "false negative;" this is because every open (resp. closed) subset is necessarily sequentially open (resp. sequentially closed) so this "test" will never indicate "false" for any set that really is open (resp. closed).
Citations[]
^ Arkhangel'skii, A.V. and Pontryagin L.S., General Topology I, definition 9 p.12
^"Topological vector space". Encyclopedia of Mathematics. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. Retrieved September 6, 2020. It is a Montel space, hence paracompact, and so normal.